×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Calculation of fault level at secondary side of transformer
5

Calculation of fault level at secondary side of transformer

Calculation of fault level at secondary side of transformer

(OP)
Hi,

I have little experience at HV side. Usually for my 800 kVA 11kV/400V 4% Ucc transformer I would calculate the fault at the LV side assuming an infinite bus at the primary, giving Isc = 800/3/230/0.04 = 29 kA

However in this particular instance we need to calculate the actual fault not this upper limit, and all we have as info is 3 phase fault level at primary is 7 kA.

How can I then calculate the fault level at the secondary, any additional info needed?

Thanks.

RE: Calculation of fault level at secondary side of transformer

2
Auslee, generally the upstream impedance doesn't make all that much difference, although I do tend to add it to my calculations and make it a *hand waving* 500 MVA. In this case you're given some figures, and the fault current is actually quite low.

So, work out the upstream capability, Short circuit capability:

Ssc = (11000/ root 3)* 7000 * 3 = 133 MVA -> [phase to line voltage * current * 3 phases]

You now need to find the upstream impedance

HV = 11000 Ssc = 133 MVA

Zup = (HV^2)/Ssc = 0.907 -> the upstream impedance in ohms

Now need to convert upstream impedance to the 400 volt base:

Zup_LV = Zup * (400/11000)^2 = 0.0012

That gives an answer in ohms, so to continue we need to convert the % impedance of the transformer into an ohmic value.

Ztr = (4/100)*(400^2/800000) = 0.008 -> (percentage/100) * (Line_line voltage squared/transformer size)

So now to work out the short circuit current:

Isc = 400/[(root 3 * (0.0012 + 0.008)] = 25.1 kA -> Voltage L-L / [root 3 * (Zup_LV + Ztr)].

And I hope that all makes sense :)

RE: Calculation of fault level at secondary side of transformer

2
Try using the MVA method:
First: calculate the short circuit MVA of each piece of the system. (MVA at LV terminals if the equipment is connected to an infinite source)

Second- combine the MVA's. (MVA's combine like admittances, add when in parallel, useinvers in series).

Utility MVAsc= 11 kV x 7 kA x 1.732 = 133.4 MVA
Transformer MVA sc = MVA x 100%/%Z = 0.8 / 0.04 = 20 MVA

The two componenets are in series so we add them like admittances:

1/MVA system = 1/MVAutility + 1/MVAtx = 1/(1/133.4 + 1/20) = 1/ 17.4. MVA sc = 17.4 MVA

I sc = (17.4 MVA x 10^3) /(400V x 1.732) = 25.1 kA

RE: Calculation of fault level at secondary side of transformer

Let me suggest one more way.

Transformer Impedance = 0.04 pu

System impedance = Transformer MVA/ System fault MVA = 0.8/133.4 = 0.006 pu

Total impedance for fault = 0.04+0.006 =0.046

Fault MVA =0.8/0.046 =17.4 MVA

Isc= 17.4 X 10000/ 1.732x400 =25.1 kA

RE: Calculation of fault level at secondary side of transformer

One point to be noted. If you have still not ordered the Transformer, taking the minimum impedance using negative tolerance will give a onerous result.
Once the actual tested value of impedance is available, a more accurate short circuit value can be derived.

RE: Calculation of fault level at secondary side of transformer

In this case maximum impedance might be the more onerous result in terms of fault clearance time, given that the available fault level is quite low.

RE: Calculation of fault level at secondary side of transformer

Can you elaborate on your concern ScottyUK?

RE: Calculation of fault level at secondary side of transformer

If the available fault current is low then protection may not be sensitive enough to operate, or may not operate as quickly, in the event of a fault. This could result in much more onerous duty being placed on equipment, e.g. as part of stability studies, arc flash analysis, etc

RE: Calculation of fault level at secondary side of transformer

I understood the basis of his comment but I just doubt it would be an issue. The OP didn't say anything about what system protection he has but let's just pretend it's a 1200A breaker - this should be reasonable for that transformer since 800kVA/(3^0.5*400V)=1156A. This thread was about bolted three phase faults which everyone agreed calculated out to 25.1kA. To my knowledge usually the instantaneous element of a breaker trips at around 10xFLA. 25.1kA is quite a bit higher than 12kA so I don't think he would have an issue with trip time in this case - the positive tolerance on top of the 4% he mentioned likely won't decrease the fault level that much. That's just what I was thinking when I read Scotty's comment.

RE: Calculation of fault level at secondary side of transformer

The intention was to say that the maximum fault level isn't always the worst case, and that the other extreme should be evaluated. I didn't check the numbers - lazy of me - but on a system with limited fault level it caught my eye as something to at least check.

Note to self : check the numbers before posting blush

RE: Calculation of fault level at secondary side of transformer

Scotty, I wouldn't beat myself up about it, it was a good point, well made. A lot of people just don't realise that a low fault level can be, in some cases, as bad as a high fault level.

To have that driven home can never be a bad thing, IMHO.

I must add, that is why I use the impedance method of calculation. As you progress down to the lower levels (boards) you just keep adding the impedances of the cabling, breakers, busburs etc, and get the resultant fault levels. This fault level can then be checked to see that distribution breakers aren't under-rated for the prospective fault current, but you can also check to make sure that they're able to trip in a timely manner.

As the above posts indicate, there is more then one way to skin a cat than the impedance method, but that's the one I learnt and is therefore the one I'm comfortable with.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources