×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Surface finish specifications
2

Surface finish specifications

Surface finish specifications

(OP)
I have been drawing a machined part based on previous designs and one area requires an Ra1.6 surface finish. However the Engineer checking the job has found another drawing which specifies the same area finished to Ra1.2. Having never had cause to give it much thought I have always assumed that the Ra range was specified in the following steps Ra 0.4, 0.8, 1.6, 3.2 and so on. Having looked into it a little I take it you can define whatever finish the job really needs - fair enough. My question is what is the standard range based on and why are those partiular values used?
In this case I suspect the change is just an error copied from one job to another.

RE: Surface finish specifications

While you can specify any value for the roughness you need, there are standard values and a subset of those that are preferred. 1.6 is one of the preferred values, 1.25 is the next lower standard value. However, we have a quite a few parts that use 1.2 and it's never been a problem.

Roughness sampling lengths, on the other hand, can only be a small number of values. 0.8 is the default if you do not specify it.

I don't know who/how the standards were determined but I keep a list of them stuck on the wall for reference.

----------------------------------------

The Help for this program was created in Windows Help format, which depends on a feature that isn't included in this version of Windows.

RE: Surface finish specifications

The metric Ra "standard" values are just conversions from old inch "standard" values.

Ra in µin: 2000, 1000, 500, 250, 125, 63, 32...

Ra in µm: 50, 25, 12.5, 6.3, 3.2, 1.6, 0.8...

RE: Surface finish specifications

2
The "Standard" values more-or-less correspond to the typical finish expected from various processes

1000 (25.2) = sand casting, torch or saw cut

500 (12.5) = rough filing, disk grinding, heavy cut and coarse feed on mill or lathe

250 (6.3) = forging, extrusion, permanent mold castings

etc. http://www.engineershandbook.com/Tables/surfacerou...

RE: Surface finish specifications

(OP)
Thanks for the replies gentlemen. I think that CoryPad has hit the nail on the head with his answer. In the end we went with Ra1.6 as we could not find a justification for the change to Ra1.2. In my experience off standard changes cost a disproportionate amount of money as manufacturers want to cover the possible extra risk/squeeze a profit out of the job!

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources