×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Plug - Ball Valve Venting in Fire-Safe applications

Plug - Ball Valve Venting in Fire-Safe applications

Plug - Ball Valve Venting in Fire-Safe applications

(OP)
I have done an exhaustive seach on the site for recommendations for Venting of Ball or Plug Valves where FireSafe Applicatons are needed. Can anyone offer some insight or recommendations? Generally (as I understand) it is an industry standard to have a vent on the side and valve installed where (when turned) has the vent facing upstream. There is also a manufacture that Vents to the bottom. Does an industry standard exist - or is this end user preference??
Thanks in advance for your replies.

RE: Plug - Ball Valve Venting in Fire-Safe applications

No, there is not an industry standard for venting the cavity between the seats. It is up to each manufacturer to establish a method to prevent excessive pressure increase within this cavity. All that is required is that the valve pass the fire test.

ASME B16.34, paragraph 2.3.3 says it is the end users responsibility to know when fluid expansion will be a problem on double-seated valves and to ask for a method for reliving this pressure. So end-users can have in their valve specifications a description on the specific way the pressure is to be relieved. I.e., a small hole through the side of the ball, a vent line from the bottom of the cavity to the upstream side, self-reliving seats, etc.

RE: Plug - Ball Valve Venting in Fire-Safe applications

@bcd...I was thinkng of this question just recently myself. My question is, there isn't a regulation temperature point at which a self relieving or by pass system be used to vent the ball caivity? I imagine this could be differnet based upon the media like you mentioned. Some expansion temperatures could be much lower or higher for different processes.

RE: Plug - Ball Valve Venting in Fire-Safe applications

Hello,

No, there is no standard temperature because there is a wide variety of non-metallic sealing materials used in these valves which results in a wide variety of temperature ratings.

There are a few standards that limit the maximum body cavity pressure at 1.33 times the rated pressure. The seats, relief valve, or however the cavity pressure is relieved shall not allow the pressure to exceed 1.33 times rated pressure. The basis of 1.33 is that it is less than the 1.5 shell test pressure the valve was subjected to, so it is a safe limit. Problem is that this 1.33 limit does not work for small valves using self-relieving seats, where it is common to use the same seat in Class 150, 300, 600 and 800 rated valves. To comply, the manufacturer must put a hole thorugh the side of the ball which now makes the valve only one way tight.

RE: Plug - Ball Valve Venting in Fire-Safe applications

(OP)
THat is what I had learned - Thanks for your input !

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources