Position tolerance, radial dimension tangent to semicircle slot
Position tolerance, radial dimension tangent to semicircle slot
(OP)
Need some thoughts on a positional tolerance.
The part is essentially a bolt circle pattern of holes with a center hole that has a diameter that cuts through the radial holes leaving semicircular slots around the bore. (see attached sketch for reference) There is an existing drawing that has a radial dimension from the center of the part to the edge (tangent) of the semicircular slot.
Is it possible to use this dimension as a basic dimension for the positional tolerance? If so what exactly does it mean? Would it be a cylindrical tolerance at that point (edge of slot) or still about the center of the semicircle?
Never mind on attached sketch, thought I could attach it directly to the post.
Thanks for any input.
The part is essentially a bolt circle pattern of holes with a center hole that has a diameter that cuts through the radial holes leaving semicircular slots around the bore. (see attached sketch for reference) There is an existing drawing that has a radial dimension from the center of the part to the edge (tangent) of the semicircular slot.
Is it possible to use this dimension as a basic dimension for the positional tolerance? If so what exactly does it mean? Would it be a cylindrical tolerance at that point (edge of slot) or still about the center of the semicircle?
Never mind on attached sketch, thought I could attach it directly to the post.
Thanks for any input.





RE: Position tolerance, radial dimension tangent to semicircle slot
Season
RE: Position tolerance, radial dimension tangent to semicircle slot
Can you understand the configuration from my description?
RE: Position tolerance, radial dimension tangent to semicircle slot
This is not the best idea from both standard and practical points of view.
Profile is a better choice.
Enclosed picture is not exactly your case, but philosophically similar.
RE: Position tolerance, radial dimension tangent to semicircle slot
The radial dimension would have to be to the PCD and would be basic. The position tolerance call out would be to the x pattern of semicircular holes. These could be conventional cylindrical zones or, bidirectional position tolerancing using polar coordinate method, as provided in ASME Y14.5 Std. Hope this helps,
Best Regards
Natarajan R.
Natarajan Ramamoorthy
Design Engineering Consultant
www.egsindia.com
RE: Position tolerance, radial dimension tangent to semicircle slot
Would you be so kind to provide reference to where exactly in Y14.5 standard Position control is applied to "semi-circular holes"?
RE: Position tolerance, radial dimension tangent to semicircle slot
Wouldn't it work if the semi-circles are >180° (having opposing points thus features of size)? Hard to tell in this situation without a sketch.
“Know the rules well, so you can break them effectively.”
-Dalai Lama XIV
RE: Position tolerance, radial dimension tangent to semicircle slot
Technically yes, if you have opposite points, you have size. Really want to see the sketch as well.
RE: Position tolerance, radial dimension tangent to semicircle slot
RE: Position tolerance, radial dimension tangent to semicircle slot
Then click on the link "...upload your file.." and follow the instructions
RE: Position tolerance, radial dimension tangent to semicircle slot
RE: Position tolerance, radial dimension tangent to semicircle slot
The way I see it, you make your R.13 basic and apply Profile to semi-circular part or the entire outline, whatever your function demands.
Profile will create tolerance zone (associated with theoretical outline) that will control both position of the semi-circle and its radius.
You can keep your .73 dimension or create dimension to pitch circle; as long as dimension is basic, it's OK
RE: Position tolerance, radial dimension tangent to semicircle slot
“Know the rules well, so you can break them effectively.”
-Dalai Lama XIV
RE: Position tolerance, radial dimension tangent to semicircle slot
Theoretically yes, but we would still have problem controlling radii (you agree that there in nowhere to apply diameter, right?)
The way radius is controlled in Y14.5 there is no way to know where the center of it is.
It was discussed many times on this forum and agreed that if you really want to control radius you use profile.
Naturally I expect to see other opinions too.
RE: Position tolerance, radial dimension tangent to semicircle slot
“Know the rules well, so you can break them effectively.”
-Dalai Lama XIV
RE: Position tolerance, radial dimension tangent to semicircle slot
RE: Position tolerance, radial dimension tangent to semicircle slot
http://www.tec-ease.com/gdt-tips-view.php?q=147
RE: Position tolerance, radial dimension tangent to semicircle slot
The difficulty is more obvious if the feature is then used as a datum reference at MMC. If it allows the datum simulator to escape, it isn't much of a constraint.
RE: Position tolerance, radial dimension tangent to semicircle slot
I think it is important to remember that the Tec-Ease graphics are intentionally incomplete. I am pretty sure the complete version of the lower drawing would show something clearly controlling the width of the opening and its location relative to datum center plane B in order to avoid the extreme scenario you just described. I think this would also help to solve the problem of "poor" interaction between the hole and its simulator, if the hole was assigned as a datum feature and referenced at MMB (MMC using '94 terminology), wouldn't it?
There is, however, one aspect that makes me say that the approach presented in the lower picture of this Tec-Ease tip isn't the best option. It is the fact that form and the LMC size of the portion of the hole that has no oppposed elements can't be controlled properly. In other words, the surface of this portion can be of any weird shape, and as long as it does not violate Rule #1 (MMC) envelope, this will not be discovered during inspection. That is why, if I really had to apply position tolerance, I would probably go with profile of surface/position combo. Profile would deal with size and form of the hole, position would make sure that location and orientation of the feature relative to datums A, B and C was properly controlled.
On the other hand, when I look at datum feature B from fig. 4-16 of Y14.5-2009 for example, I see a feature controlled by perpendicularity tolerance (similar concept to position, but without locational constrains) that isn't full cylinder too, yet its size is controlled by directly toleranced dimension, leaving the portion of the feature with no opposed elements totally uncontrolled for form and the LMC size. In the light of this figure, I would not say that the Tec-Ease picture shows anything being in clear violation of Y14.5's approach to locating or orienting features of size (Side note: as the tip is based on Y14.5M-1994, I would love to use a figure from this version of the standard, but unfortunately was not able to find a single picture showing non-360° FOS controlled by position or orientation tolerance).
RE: Position tolerance, radial dimension tangent to semicircle slot
John-Paul Belanger
Certified Sr. GD&T Professional
Geometric Learning Systems
RE: Position tolerance, radial dimension tangent to semicircle slot
a) the feature is considered to have perfect size where it is incomplete
b) the feature size is based on assuming the feature is the size one might extrapolate based on the feature fragment
c) the feature is not a feature of size in that direction
d) the standard doesn't have an adequate interpretation of this condition
http://www.tec-ease.com/gdt-tips-view.php?q=132 says one thing, another place something else.
Majorly interrupted cylinders or widths result in majorly irregular tolerance zones. I prefer to think of features of size as being a special case, without irregular zones, as one would expect from opposed surfaces. In explanation of the mess they left, I'll say the committee did the best they could.
Here's a nice example: Take a cylindrical rod and machine two parallel flats on it so that it has an ob-round section. Is the size of the section the distance between the flats or the extrapolated diameter? In the direction perpendicular to the flats, would one suggest the item's size is controlled by the diameter? How would one verify the diameter size in the direction perpendicular to the flats? How much of the cylinder can be removed and still be used as a feature of size?
RE: Position tolerance, radial dimension tangent to semicircle slot
Take, for example, Fig. 4-16 in the standard. The 11 mm hole is interrupted; are you saying that this is an incorrect usage of the size/diameter callout, merely because it's not a complete 360-degree circle?
If we agree that the standard is OK in this usage, then we could extrapolate that idea (make the slot bigger and bigger until it eats up almost half of the circle). Where would we say that it can no longer use the diameter callout or any type of GD&T that's meant for features of size?
John-Paul Belanger
Certified Sr. GD&T Professional
Geometric Learning Systems