×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

IBC / ASCE Seismic Load Effect "E" Question

IBC / ASCE Seismic Load Effect "E" Question

IBC / ASCE Seismic Load Effect "E" Question

(OP)
Understanding that the intention to combine the "horizontal" and "vertical" effects in the formulas ( E = pQe + .2SdsD) in each reference to attain the seismic "E" value to use in the load combinations, is it not redundant adding the .2Sdsx(D) back in when the Qe is the horizontal value, assumed to equal V, which based on the Dead Load in the first place?


RE: IBC / ASCE Seismic Load Effect "E" Question

I have always interpreted the additional .2SdsD as an increase or decrease in the dead load to account for the motion that might be up and down. On one and two story structures this load might be small, but if you were looking at a 10+ story building the load may become significant.

RE: IBC / ASCE Seismic Load Effect "E" Question

The second term (.25Sds) is an effect on the structure due to VERTICAL seismic motions.
The first term is the HORIZONTAL.

So they are not redundant in that they are forces applied in different directions at the same time and in the same load combination.

RE: IBC / ASCE Seismic Load Effect "E" Question

(OP)
It's peculiar syntax to mix directions within the same formula.

RE: IBC / ASCE Seismic Load Effect "E" Question

The equation as you typed it may be a bit peculiar but if you look at the equations in ASCE 7-05 section 12.4.2.3, it makes complete sense, at least to me. That is, 0.2SDS is added to the dead load (i.e., it is a vertical load) and this load is acting along with the other loads, including horizontal seismic force effects, in a load combination. Note the 0.2 factor is different for the ASD load combinations.

RE: IBC / ASCE Seismic Load Effect "E" Question

(OP)
Yes, I see that.
It seemed like it could be a perpetual spiral...adding more dead load could add more lateral load being based on the dead load and so on.
Reading too far into it perhaps. Should be taken exactly as the formula is written.

Thanks.

RE: IBC / ASCE Seismic Load Effect "E" Question

The seismic horizontal load is based on the mass of the building.
That horizontal load is derived completely separate from the vertical seismic load.
They are then combined in the load combination. I guess I don't see how they could perpetually spiral.

One way to think about the combinations is not as an "formula" as you put it - but rather as a sum of effects on the structure.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources