INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Jobs

hot rod chassis trends

hot rod chassis trends

(OP)


It seems like massive crossmembers, severed at the middle, then joined with a wisp of bent tubing or bar stock are popular even in some high end hot rod chassis.
Also popular details are additional longitudinal rails located inboard of the main rails, often by a single crossbeam, which the single main rails are stuck onto sometimes at mid span.
Some of these are intended to go under cars whose bodies offer little or no structural assistance.
==========
http://www.artmorrison.com/gallery/main.php?g2_vie...

http://www.artmorrison.com/images/49-54Chevy/final...

http://waclark0.tripod.com/sitebuildercontent/site...

http://image.minitruckinweb.com/f/events/midwest/1...

http://www.minitruckinweb.com/events/midwest/0901m...#

http://www.precisioncarrestoration.com/wp-content/...
==========

By mere jaded inspection I don't see how they are that appropriate to receive and transmit chassis loads or barely support transmission tail housings.
Details that would do A far better job, using less material seems kind of obvious.
I realize once something is strong/stiff "enough" to roll around town or down the highway for 10-15 years THAT probably is also "good enough"

RE: hot rod chassis trends

My uncle found an unmodified '32 Model A 3-window coupe, and was finishing up a restoration of sorts when he died. I got to see it at various stages of (dis)assembly. I was particularly struck by how thin the original metal was was, both body and chassis. ... not from corrosion; it was a lightweight car.

Most hot rodders are craftsmen, not engineers. They tend to copy stuff that looks cool, but are not equipped to judge whether a structure is efficient or even adequate. They engineer by experience; if a hard launch wrinkles the chassis, they fix the wrinkle and reinforce the area around it, and recurse until stuff stops breaking. Then they go into business to try to recover a little of what they have spent on 'development'. winky smile

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: hot rod chassis trends

In the first photo, the massive crossmember where the rear suspension arms attach is probably not actually needed at all inboard of the suspension arm attachment points. The stub extending inward from the main frame serves to transfer the load to the frame rails, but the part in the middle likely doesn't do much. The thing that is not known from just that photograph, is whether the body of the vehicle is supported on the middle part of that crossmember, although given that the drive shaft goes through there even on the vehicle that this chassis was designed for, it's unlikely.

Most of those frames are likely stronger than the original frame underneath that vehicle, even if the design perhaps might not be "optimum" from the engineering point of view.

RE: hot rod chassis trends

The Art Morrison stuff looks like 30's Ford replacement frames and while they don't have much torsional rigidity I don't see much concern running them under such a vehicle. Could a different structure or more bracing help the rigidity? Probably, but they're likely more then capable for their intended purpose.

The truck ones? Well, the first one isn't terrible since the suspension control arms tie into the main frame under the cab and it looks better there. But that 90* bent tube bracing the rear frame rails is useless and some diagonal support for the rear rails wouldn't hurt. The rear rails would have been better extending forward under the cab or I would have put those other tubes further inboard in-line with the rear rails. I would hope the second one is nothing more then a frame for a show truck so it can "lay frame".

The ladder structure down the middle of the last one certainly is a waste with it bending back to the outside rail. It's not completed either.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close