×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Double fillet welded corner joint

Double fillet welded corner joint

Double fillet welded corner joint

(OP)
I work for a steel supplier that supplies connections for a heavy timber (glulam) manufacturer. Our typical weld for joining plates is a open corner fillet weld (both sides).
An example is this top mount hanger (see drawing). I've had an Engineer tell me that this is not a code approved weld for this type of loading, is he correct?

RE: Double fillet welded corner joint

Dear weh

The weld you shown in that sketch was good and economical compared to full welding in corner.
this type of welding is available in AWS. please refer

RE: Double fillet welded corner joint

I would say that the connection details depend on the magnitude of the load and whether the nature of the loading is static or cyclic.

In the case of static loading, as long as the fillets are sized properly, they should work. However, if the loads are cyclic, the unfused root can act as a crack initiation point.

The Engineer, responsible for the design, should be the individual making the decision whether the connection is appropriate for the application.

Best regards - Al

RE: Double fillet welded corner joint

The weld, top left, should be a sixteenth of an inch thinner than the thickness of the top plate; as shown, it looks more like full penetration depending on the difference in plate thickness.

Michael.
"Science adjusts its views based on what's observed. Faith is the denial of observation so that belief can be preserved." ~ Tim Minchin

RE: Double fillet welded corner joint

(OP)
The loads are static. If the plate is greater than 1/4" than the welds would be a minimum of 1/16" less than the plate thickness as per sect. J2 of the AISC Steel Construction Manual.

RE: Double fillet welded corner joint

Two thoughts. First that wouldn't be my favorite weld configuration due to joint prep. I imagine there would be a lot of open root welding going on. That being said to say a weld is not code approved-I dunno. If one developed a wps for a specific configuration and qualified it, assuming it met prescriptive criteria, I believe you could meet aws.

I was on a job where a double fillet was said to be equivalent to a full pen. It would have been except we were using grade 60 572 plate instead of 50 which the fillets were sized for. Also it was composite wall construction so the plate was acting as rebar and had to be able to develop loads beyond yield. Bottom line is the numbers didn't work out and they cut out/ground out a few thousand feet of fillet weld, beveled the plate for a full pen and used the back fillet as backer bar. Now that was a crazy weld but it was qualified and a wps created and we had welding engineers on the engineering and contractor side looking at it. This was on a nuclear power plant so obviously the budget was large, just pointing out that odd weld joints have been used in the past.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources