×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Displaying Minimum Fillet Weld Size
5

Displaying Minimum Fillet Weld Size

Displaying Minimum Fillet Weld Size

(OP)
Hi all

There has been a debate in the office regarding if it was ever appropriate to show a fillet weld call on a plan without the size. Some engineers "in the day" were taught that displaying a fillet weld symbol without including the weld size used to indicate that a minimum weld should be assumed by the fabricator. Currently, fillet weld sizes are routinely displayed, on one (or both) side of the arrow line, depending on whether the weld is a single or double fillet.

The AISC Steel Construction Manual, since at least 1989, has displayed the same Standard location of weld symbol elements (currently Table 8-2 in AISC 360). A passage from this table reads that "Arrow and Other Side weld sizes are of the same size unless otherwise shown", suggesting that the weld size need only be displayed on one side of the line (for a double fillet) in most cases. Dimensions (length/spacing) however must be shown on both sides of the line. Nowhere however, does the code mention that the size may be left off the call, if a fillet weld is to be a minimum weld.

My question is this. Despite what seemed to have been industry practice in years gone (1980's) to omit the weld size for a minimum fillet call, was there ever any basis in code that would have allowed that practice to evolve?

Thanks for your assistance.

RE: Displaying Minimum Fillet Weld Size

3
Correct in all regards. However, if you are feeling perverse, you can define an undimensioned fillet symbol as "minimum weld" in the General Notes portion of each drawing, along with a chart of minimum sizes versus basematal thicknesses.

And thus guarantee many holdups due to the welders doing the work asking somebody "Just what size do they want this weld?"

Not dimensioning a fillet was laziness by the draftsman in the 1960's, and still is. Or possibly ignorance, being perpetuated across many pages of prints. The decent thing to do is educate your draftsman/engineer and to put the size* on every symbol.
*Fillet sizes on prints are always the minimum acceptable size. And a good welder/fabricator will add a little for insurance from zealous Inspectors; i.e. 1/4" on dwg, welded at a shy 5/16". They have found out [the hard way] that when you aim at a minimum value, about half the time you will be below that value. ASME allows no underage, AWS only allows 10% of the length to be slightly undersize.

RE: Displaying Minimum Fillet Weld Size

I think is time for AISC to catch up with AWS A2.4 welding symbols. The weld size is suppose to be shown independent of the other since 1976.

Best regards - Al

RE: Displaying Minimum Fillet Weld Size

gtaw, AISC is getting closer.

13th edition Table 8-2: "Arrow and other side welds are the same size unless otherwise shown. Dimensions of fillet welds must be shown on both the arrow side and other side symbol"

14th edition Table 8-2: "Dimensions of fillet welds must be shown on both the arrow side and other side symbol"

RE: Displaying Minimum Fillet Weld Size

What about welders who really pile it on? 1/8th weld called for and you get 3/8 to 1/2 inch? Is there a standard way of reining them in short of requiring grind/machine to size post weld? Not to mention the distortion from such excess.

Saw a bracket that had plenty of designed room for a fastener; welds on .06 metal are tangent to the mounting holes starting from a wall a .38 to .50 away.

RE: Displaying Minimum Fillet Weld Size

It is called training and disciplining your work force.

Best regards - Al

RE: Displaying Minimum Fillet Weld Size

gtaw,

Wonderful answer!

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources