×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Toe slope below cantilever wall

Toe slope below cantilever wall

Toe slope below cantilever wall

(OP)
I'm curious as to what people do when designing a cantilever retaining wall with toe slope for the drained and undrained conditions. By cantilever, I mean say timber pole uprights at a 3 to 4 foot spacing, embedded by either driving or in concreted augered holes and with timber lagging/railing supporting the ground upslope. Embedment may be the same or more than the retained height.

For example, in undrained conditions I've seen the design retained height increased by [ 4 x pile dia x tan(toeslope) ], to essentially create a wall with level toe conditions.

RE: Toe slope below cantilever wall

There is an equation for a descending passive soils coefficient (Kp) using Rankine method. Is that what you need?

http://www.soilstructure.com/

RE: Toe slope below cantilever wall

(OP)
Yes, I've seen that method.

I don't have any particular problem that needs solving, rather I'm interested in what others are doing to account for a toe slope in doing their wall design - whether something like the Kp reduction, increasing the theoretical wall height to create 'level toe' conditions (and how this is done) or something else. I guess I was hoping for some general discussion.



RE: Toe slope below cantilever wall

I noticed the following: If I use one friction angle for both the retained and the passive soils, there is no adverse effects for Kp when the backfill slope is level. However, when the backfill angle is inclined, the passive Kp automatically reduces (As Ka increases, 1/Ka or Kp reduces).

So recently I have been using two friction angles, two unit weights and two slope angles for the Active and Passive soils. As for the passive wedge or passive multipler, I never go as high as 4, I use 0.08(Phi) which ranges from 2 to 3 pier diameters.
For cantilever piles (timber, soldier beam, sheetpiles, etc), I always check the design embedment depth is where the pile tip defelction is very close to zero. You will notice the embedment depth is influenced by surcharges, so for example, you may get 1.5H or so if you have high vertical uniform surcharge and 1.2H if there are no surcharges at all.

http://www.soilstructure.com/

RE: Toe slope below cantilever wall

It seems there are 3 different approximate approaches:

1. An empirical method which uses a 3:1 slope from the intersection of level ground up to the wall. Then half of this height is used.

2. Surcharge Method - The berm is converted to a uniform surcharge applied over the width of the passive failure wedge.

3. NAVFAC Method - This uses a trial wedge or the Rankine reduction as mentioned by FixedEarth above.

Or there is finite element I suppose.

I believe PileBuck which is/was a popular sheet pile program uses something similar to method 3 where they just input a negative value of the back slope into the coulomb or rankine or Terzaghi equations.

Supposedly Method 2 is overly conservative, method 1 is conservative and method 3 can be slightly non-conservative or should use a reduction/factor safety as mentioned by FE. He is some more information:

I'm not sure where to find this:
http://books.google.com/books/about/Design_Guidanc...

Thesis on the subject:
http://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=7...

Some further discussion:
http://www.mycrisp.com/publications/A%20CANTILEVER...

EIT
www.HowToEngineer.com

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources