×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Weep Hole - Coefficient of Discharge

Weep Hole - Coefficient of Discharge

Weep Hole - Coefficient of Discharge

(OP)

The problem:

A large, mass concrete sea wall with free-draining backfill is subjected to overtopping and is designed to allow for 1.0 m tidal lag (hydrostatic head).

The weep holes / drainage pipes therefore need to be capable of allowing a flow through the wall greater than the overtopping rate (with a 1.0 m hydrostatic head) otherwise the hydrostatic head will build up to a level greater than 1.0 m and the wall will fail.

I have used the following equation to calculate the capacity of the pipes under a 1.0 m hydrostatic head:

Q = Cd * A * √(2*g*H)

Where Cd = Coefficient of discharge, A = Cross-sectional area of pipe, g = Gravitational acceleration, H = Hydrostatic head (1.0 m)

The question:

The weep holes are 250 mm diameter pipes. The pipes are approx. 6 m long. The geometry of the pipes is such that they fall 0.5 m over the 6 m length (from inlet to outlet). What therefore is the coefficient of discharge? Is it even applicable because from my reading it seems to be relevant only to "orifices" - is a 6 m pipe too long to be considered an "orifice"?

More information:

In a previous calculation Cd had been taken as 0.7 - I do not know why and no justification was given.

RE: Weep Hole - Coefficient of Discharge

I certainly hope you are not relying on just the weep holes for stability of a sea wall. the wall should be stable even if they are plugged

RE: Weep Hole - Coefficient of Discharge

There are a lot of questions to that design that seem super hard to assess - what is the rate of overtopping with a storm surge, what will be the tailwater level when the weeps are draining, etc. It seems it would be most prudent to eliminate those questions and design the wall assuming the backside is full of water as the previous poster suggested.

However, to start to answer your question regarding the capacity of the weep drains/lines...
1) You need to check both the orifice capacity (inlet control) and the weep pipe flow capacity (outlet control). This would be very similar to highway culvert design - check both conditions and use the worse case. You Cd is in the ballpark of what I would use (I'd use 0.61) but the equation assumes the pipe inlet is wide open (not partially block with free-draining backfill. If you put the typically "screen and stone" at the weep inlet, the orifice capacity will be greatly diminished.
2) You need to know the tailwater elevation (ocean level when the weep is draining) in order to calculate the pipe flow capacity.
3) Obviously, seawater will flow both ways in the weep line. Consequently, it may make some sense to install duckbill valves (e.g., Tideflex valves) on the outlet of each weep line.

Again - so many unknowns. I'd just design the wall assuming the back side is filled to the brim.

RE: Weep Hole - Coefficient of Discharge

Barnacle build up in the holes for sure.

RE: Weep Hole - Coefficient of Discharge

If I understand what you're describing, then the orifice equation is not applicable. The orifice equation is applied to culverts in inlet control on the presumption that there is a vena contracta at the entrance, and the geometry of the orifice plate creates differences in that vena contracta, which lead to different coefficients of discharge. None of that applies to what you're describing, if I understand your situation properly.

I don't routinely design seawalls, but if I did, I think I would make sure they didn't tip over even if the weep holes were all suddenly clogged by oysters and the like.

Hydrology, Drainage Analysis, Flood Studies, and Complex Stormwater Litigation for Atlanta and the South East - http://www.campbellcivil.com

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources