×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Building Expansion Joint Sizing

Building Expansion Joint Sizing

Building Expansion Joint Sizing

(OP)

I was curious how most are sizing building expansion joint widths in seismic design category A, B and C buildings.

Are you sizing it for thermal movement, amplified seismic movement, a combination of the two, or another method?

RE: Building Expansion Joint Sizing

I usually look at wind or seismic (I'm in A, B or C generally - sometimes D) and use SRSS of the two adjacent structures for whatever gap I get.

RE: Building Expansion Joint Sizing

I do the same as JAE. I have not found thermal to control expansion joint sizes on the projects I have done, but I have only had to deal with a handful of expansion joints myself. I also like to add in a bit for some construction tolerance.

RE: Building Expansion Joint Sizing

I usually go with 1.5X to 2X the combined lateral movement due to seismic and let the Architects cry over the joint created.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering

RE: Building Expansion Joint Sizing

ASCE 7-05 does not allow SRSS when sizing the building separation from seismic loads. Per 12.12.3 the separation is equal to the amplified drift of both structures added together.

RE: Building Expansion Joint Sizing

ASCE 7-10 requires the SRSS be used as a minimum separation. I think the SRSS was in the 97 UBC. The 2009 IBC also uses the SRSS (eq 16-45). FEMA 750 C12.12.3 recommends the SRSS and "For very rigid shear wall structures with rigid diaphragms whose lateral deflections cannot be reasonably estimated, it is suggested that older code requirements for structural separations of at least 1 inch (25 mm) plus 1/2 inch (13 mm) for each 10 feet (3 m) of height above 20 feet (6 m) be followed." Note: the drift used for building separations is typically the maximum inelastic (amplified) drift with torsion.

RE: Building Expansion Joint Sizing

My jurisdiction has not adopted ASCE 7-10 yet. The California Building code also allowed a smaller expansion joint sizing by using SRSS.

If you have 2 moment frame buildings abutting, and you're under ASCE 7-05 the additive rather than SRSS combo for amplified drift yields ridiculous widths in my opinion.

I wish I could have used SRSS...

RE: Building Expansion Joint Sizing

I've always used twice the maximum wind drift on a single building. It's a little conservative, but usually ends up with a 2" joint or less. The first time I tried to set the expansion joint wide enough to accommodate the seismic drift of both buildings my boss looked at me cross-eyed and said we don't do that because it results in unrealistically wide joints (this particular 8 story building would have had a 7" expansion joint).

RE: Building Expansion Joint Sizing

this is true "lion06", in seismic zones displacement due to earthquake shall be multiplied by 0.7xR befor doing the SRSS operation and this will give you wide joints (around 15 to 20 cm and more)

RE: Building Expansion Joint Sizing

(OP)
Lion06, so glad you said that because I have across this reasoning before, too. It's primarily the reason I asked, although I can't find justification for it.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources