×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Skew steel bridge with no cross-beams

Skew steel bridge with no cross-beams

Skew steel bridge with no cross-beams

(OP)
I am Reviewing an Existing steel bridge. the Bridge is very skew, average Span = 40meters, main girder depth = 2.00meters and you can say NO cross-girders.

My questions are:
1-is there is any specs about the analysis/design of such bridge with No cross-beams
2-I run the normal grillage analysis and the girders were safe, but am I missing any other strains because of the "no X-girders issue"
3-if, we assume No lateral torsional buckling, No wind , No seismic, why do I need the cross-frames for?

thanks for your assistance in advance

RE: Skew steel bridge with no cross-beams

A composite concrete deck would act like crossframes. You have composite deck, right? Otherwise, how are the compression flanges supported? How did you model the deck? Do you see large forces in the deck due to differential deflection between adjacent girders? Does the existing deck show signs of distress?

How can you assume no lateral torsional buckling and no wind?

RE: Skew steel bridge with no cross-beams

(OP)
Graybeach

Yes I have a Composite deck. I modeled the deck as a shell/plate element with a very weak properties in case of dead load, i.e. wet concrete and with the right properties in case of superimposed dead and live load.

What I mean by there is no lateral torsional buckling and no wind, is according to NSBA/AASHTO, the function of the cross frames is following:
1-prevent lateral torsional buckling
2-transfer wind/ lateral loading to support
3-reduce the differential deflection between different girders at the same location
4-reduce flange lateral bending and torsion in case of Skew/and curved bridges, knowing that part of the flange lateral bending or torsion that exist in the skew bridges result from the action of cross-frames trying to reduce differential deflection.

So if 1& 2 is some how prevented, are points 3 & 4 will make a problem to me.

Moreover, I don't remember seeing any skew bridge with No cross-frames and neither I remember that the AASHTO addressing the possibility of such situation

RE: Skew steel bridge with no cross-beams

Crossframes on a highly skewed bridge can actually be a hindrance because they provide a shorter path for forces to get to a bearing. Sometimes this results in lift off at the acute corners. I would think the girders were somehow braced while the deck was being poured. Once the deck cured, perhaps the bracing was removed by design.

I can't speak to whether they are absolutely required at your location if calculations show that they are not needed. Here in the states, the governing DOT would have an opinion. I have always found them necessary at the bearings to transfer seismic loads to the substructure.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources