×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Hydrostatic Charge Pump pressure relief and energy efficiency

Hydrostatic Charge Pump pressure relief and energy efficiency

Hydrostatic Charge Pump pressure relief and energy efficiency

(OP)
I am university professor working with some students developing a very small skid-steer vehicle. We are powering it with a 13 HP engine. We have purchased a hydrostatic pump system from Hydro-gear with two variable displacement piston pumps as well as an auxiliary gear pump which we will use as a charge pump for the hydrostatic closed loops as well as a source for operating some simple auxiliary functions like raising and lowering a plow blade. The catalog recommends that the charge relief should be around 600 psi. Because we are powering this with such a small engine we don't want to waste any power. The auxiliary pump produces about 2-3 gpm. If the charge pressure has to be set to 600 psi, the auxiliary pump will be wasting precious power if we use a simple relief valve to maintain the charge pressure. What would be the benefits and drawbacks of using an unloading valve to keep the charge pressure at 600 psi while stilling allowing the auxiliary pump to "unload" to tank without wasting power?

I appreciate any insights anyone has on this issue.

Aaron Schellenberg
Mechanical Engineering Professor
Brigham Young University - Idaho

RE: Hydrostatic Charge Pump pressure relief and energy efficiency

Hello Aaron

There could be an opportunity to reduce the 600 PSI, but it depends on the power required to drive the auxiliary functions and the minimum pressure required to overcome the internal friction in the pump.

A relief and unloading valve won't reduce the energy consumption, it will just stop energy wastage above the level actually required to carry out the functions.

The main limitation is the internal friction in the pump. With a resistive force, a load sensing valve could be used. There is no resistive load as such in the pump. If the pressure in the piston is not sufficient to keep the head of the piston against the swash plate, the pump will run into problems. For this reason the pump designer has stated the minimum pressure required to overcome the internal friction. On a pump to pump basis, that pressure will be lower. Although the internal friction will vary with temperature and speed, so what works on one day will perhaps not work on another day.

Unfortunately you don't have much power to play with, so your options are limited. It will all be very marginal.


I can't see that you have many options at this stage.

HPOST CEng MIMechE

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources