×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Estimating Consolidation Settlement within Fill

Estimating Consolidation Settlement within Fill

Estimating Consolidation Settlement within Fill

(OP)
It is my understanding that 1D consolidation testing is generally best for sedimentary type soils; however, I'm not sure about engineered fills. Would consolidation testing of remolded samples (proposed fill) provide useful information? If so, what does one use for a preconsolidation pressure when estimating settlement WITHIN the fill?

RE: Estimating Consolidation Settlement within Fill

I don't know about others as to their practice, but for me, I neglect any settlement that may take place within an engineered fill. The reason is the soil below usually is significantly more compressible and the accuracy of the estimating is not that precise anyhow.

RE: Estimating Consolidation Settlement within Fill

(OP)
Thanks oldestguy....I was able to stumble upon a journal article that was of benefit; understanding that the settlements are probably relatively minor.

Nwabuokei, S.O., and Lovel, C.W., "Compressibility and Settlement of Compacted Fills"; 1986

RE: Estimating Consolidation Settlement within Fill

As oldestguy noted, they can usually be neglected for a couple of reasons. First, if the soil is compactible and competent for fill, its settlement is most likely going to be elastic. Elastic settlements are usually quite small unless the layer is quite thick.

Secondly, and related, if the soil is fill and it is compacted, the compaction takes out most of the consolidation issues and leaves mostly elastic conditions for settlement.

If you have very thick fill (say 8 to 10 feet) that is simply dumped in with no compaction, some settlement can occur. You can consider this and compute it from the void ratio change between the loose state and the compacted state.

RE: Estimating Consolidation Settlement within Fill

Always be sure of the definitions.
To Some - Structural Fill is always an imported Granular, usually non- or very low plastic material. The compaction spec and control should be commensurate with the thickness of fill and final use (i.e. what kind & type of structural loads are to be applied).

To others, myself included - Structural Fill is a pre-approved (by the Geotech & in full knowledge of the design/Structural Engineer) soil or material, may be native, placed under controlled conditions (compaction specs, appropriate testing & observation), all commensurate with the anticipated use.

There are also many areas between these extremes.

RE: Estimating Consolidation Settlement within Fill

I have vastly different experiences with fill than either oldestguy or Ron. No matter what we specify or how close we inspect, we get long term settlement approaching 2% in fill (select or other). We design water and wastewater treatment facilities, so we routinely have deep tanks or basins next to at-grade structures. We always either fill the excavated volume with a non compressible material (like slurry), or support the at-grade structure from the native unexcavated material with piers or columns.
When we haven't respected this settlement we've been sorry, with cracked walls, misaligned stairs and other unfortunate events.

RE: Estimating Consolidation Settlement within Fill

My experience is similar to Jed's. For a whole building founded on a uniform thickness of inspected fill, I would agree that settlement of the fill is not usually a big issue for the building, but can be a problem for connecting services. For fill adjacent to basements and the like, time dependent settlement is invariably an issue, and these areas require any external slabs to be treated as suspended elements. Going back a few years later to fix settled pavements is not fun. As to estimating how much settlement will occur, I don't know.

RE: Estimating Consolidation Settlement within Fill

The question dealt with lab (or other) testing of "engineered" fill as related to "consolidation". First off, "consolidation" usually only applies to squeezing out of water. However. most "engineered" fills in my experience are granular soils and I would not be doing that test on that material. I don't see where consolidation testing applies there. However, for the few cohesive soil compacted fills I know of for building structures (presumably fitting the definition of engineered), the main concern is to not over compacting and later having heaving from expansion. So the question of settlement within the fill usually has not been of concern for either type of soil used for "engineered" fill. In the above I do not consider roadway compacted fills as necessarily fitting the term "engineered", although I suppose they do. Having been the head honcho for WiDOT soils dept, we never tested any compacted fill for "consolidation" characteristics.

RE: Estimating Consolidation Settlement within Fill

Thick engineered fills (granular and/or cohesive) are a different story, particularly if a slope is involved and with wetting/irrigation. Too much to discuss here without a focus. Try a search with "Noorany" + focus term.

RE: Estimating Consolidation Settlement within Fill

With dams and levees, we typically expect settlemnts of the embankment of at least 1 percent of the fill height and often closer to 3 percent of the fill height. Levees are typically constructed to a lower percentage of the max than dams.

Mike Lambert

RE: Estimating Consolidation Settlement within Fill

I have seen USBR state design should be 1% of fill height as a conservative estimate for settlement of well constructed earth dams.

RE: Estimating Consolidation Settlement within Fill

(OP)
In my original question, the term "engineered fill" was meant to indicate the fill was placed at a defined moisture and compaction. I've never heard of this term only pertaining to a granular material....not sure that everyone would agree with it being granular only????

Again, the reference I posted seems to have a rational approach to estimation of fill settlement (settlement within a lean clay, lacustrine, fill); however, I haven't mulled through it completely. Ref: Nwabuokei, S.O., and Lovel, C.W., "Compressibility and Settlement of Compacted Fills"; 1986

My gut feel is that the settlements would be on the order of 1 to 2 percent of the fill thickness as most have suggested.

RE: Estimating Consolidation Settlement within Fill

compression of engineered fills is likely. Consolidation is not likely. Compression is an elastic response. Consolidation is a response based on saturation and permeability. I'd find it hard to believe that the fill is saturated to the point where change in void ration would be influenced by saturation and permeability.

I'd use settlement plates and periodic survey to gauge the post-placement compression as much of what you think may happen will occur during placement.

f-d

¡papá gordo ain’t no madre flaca!

RE: Estimating Consolidation Settlement within Fill

I must have been using the terminology incorrectly all these years. When a fill settles under its own weight over time, I call that consolidation, but wouldn't consider it elastic. Am I wrong?

RE: Estimating Consolidation Settlement within Fill

hokie, you and I agree on that.

RE: Estimating Consolidation Settlement within Fill

As others have stated, consolidation involves void ratio reduction due to water being squeezed out of saturated material. What you are describing is elastic compression.

RE: Estimating Consolidation Settlement within Fill

The terminology probably can be blamed on Terzaghi? Trouble is maybe those writing our dictionaries didn't get to take the courses back then. Somehow combining two businesses fits the term also.

RE: Estimating Consolidation Settlement within Fill

Terminology has to be used in the right way : when air is squeezed out of a soil, natural or engineered, the right word is compaction. When water is squeezed out, then it's consolidation. Consolidation is generally not associated to engineered fills constructed in layers above groundwater table, and are generally made of granular materials. The only fills I can think of which might experience consolidation are mine tailings and dredged sédiments but I wouldn't call them engineered fills. As a vertical drain contractor, I have been asked sometimes to install drains in materials above groundwater table by people who didn't understand the basics of consolidation theory ...

RE: Estimating Consolidation Settlement within Fill

I'll concede that in geotechnical terms, consolidation is not what happens in engineered fills which settle under their own weight over time. But this settlement, compression, volume change, whatever, is not elastic...it is time dependent and doesn't return to the original when unloaded. In structural terms, it would be creep deflection.

RE: Estimating Consolidation Settlement within Fill

Quote (hokie66)

When a fill settles under its own weight over time, I call that consolidation, but wouldn't consider it elastic?

I this example it could be either. If the mode of settlement is directly related to the relief of excess pore pressure over time, then it's consolidation. However, if the fill is not saturated and the settlement response is related to modulus (or C-sub Alpha), I'd call it compression. Bear in mind that secondary compression (i.e., the change of void ratio in the absence of changing effective stress) is called "compression" for a reason. Consolidation is not taking place!

Quote (hokie66)

But this settlement, compression, volume change, whatever, is not elastic...it is time dependent and doesn't return to the original when unloaded. In structural terms, it would be creep deflection.

It is pseudo-elastic. So, you are correct, it's not precisely elastic. I think geotechnical engineers use the term compression and think in terms of "elastic" behavoir, 'cause it's a way to approach the problem. In granular soils (i.e., where permeability is to great to really affect the analysis, we'd consider some "elastic response" to loading (modulus based) and then add (roughly) 20 percent for the anticipated long-term "creep" effects. You see in most instances, the compression that you'd calculate would occur during construction (i.e., as the fill is being placed). So, now the question is what would you expect post-construction (i.e., after delivery to the owner)?

f-d

¡papá gordo ain’t no madre flaca!

RE: Estimating Consolidation Settlement within Fill

(OP)
Aside from a philosophical debate about mechanism; how does one go about calculating the 'within fill settlement' of a large clay fill (moisture conditioned to optimum and specified compaction....call it what you will; engineered fill or otherwise) in normal practice due to self weight or expected moisture changes.



RE: Estimating Consolidation Settlement within Fill

nbr:

Very interesting question when it comes to how the fill is placed and finally is found to settle. Say the job lasts three months, in the case of a dam built on hard rock. Let's say it takes about a week to get 50% "compression effect", a month to get 90% for a typical layer of the fill material for a given layer thickness and loading pressure. Each layer however gets a different loading situation and with time and any "drainage" may be different. So when the job finally is done, which layer is then contributing how much to the total settlement of the final surface, as related to time? A good job for a computer programmer to predict the final settlement rate and amount at the top surface. Then, when all is done, work backwards and compare to lab consolidation test data to see how you did in predicting when job schedules are subject to variations with time..

I think the guess of 1 or 2 percent might be easier.

RE: Estimating Consolidation Settlement within Fill

Predicitng the settlement accurately is extremely difficult. Estimating 1% (or 2%) of fill height would likely be the most practical. For detailed analyses, try googling "deep fill hydrocompression by Noorany, Bandon, Duncan"

RE: Estimating Consolidation Settlement within Fill

Ill throw in my 2 cents but please bear in mind that my terminology might be wrong since english is not my native laguage.
When building on fill one would usualy dig out the virgin ground and replace it with controled fill material that will be compacted.
Before the placement of the fill we usualy have geotehnical team mesuring the "constrained modulus of compressibility" kN/m2 of the virgin soil wich will give you some idea of the compressibility of the ground on wich you are planning to fill.
"constarined modulus of compressibility" is obtained from field results while loading an 15cm diametar circular plate into the ground. I think it messures increas of vertical stress wich is then divided by vertical strain.
Depending on the result eg. if below 15000kN/m2 we place geosythetics before the first fill layer.
If the readings are above 20000kN/m2 we just fill the ground and start compacting.
When finished with compaction, modulus is messured one more time for the new soil.
Results should range from 20000kN/m2 to 40000kN/m2 for well compacted fill.
If mv=30000kN/m2, and let say that you new net loading due to the foundation is 150 kN/m2, strain=150/30000 you would expect settlement in range of s=strain x h (thickness of the fill).
Anyway, you should always pay attention to the geometry of your container (ground hole geometry).
Try avoiding that the container edges are touched by the fictive 45` load disspresion line from the foundations since edges will always be problematic for good compaction.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources