×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Salary Confidentiality
13

Salary Confidentiality

Salary Confidentiality

(OP)
Hello ladies and gents,

  We recently extended an offer to a new EE grad. We work in a small office (6 people not including sales staff who work at a kiosk). Though the new hire will initially be making less than most in the office, we are writing in a pay bump after one year that will have him making more than some people, including technicians who are 20+ years older (though have only worked here less than a year).

  When he starts working, I was thinking of just sitting down with and asking him if he would please keep his salary information confidential in the office to avoid any issues. I don't know if I need to go any further than that, but as we haven't written his contract yet, is it prudent to put something in there as well? He doesn't seem like a blabber, but he hasn't started working yet and it's only our second engineering hire.

   Just wondering if anyone has any input and experience in the issue. Thanks in advance!

  

RE: Salary Confidentiality

People will talk about whatever they are comfortable with, even if specifically told not to (though in those cases they'll usually whisper about the subject rather than talk at a normal volume). The younger generation seems to have less reticence about sharing personal info (we've discussed this here before)... a fresh grad we hired a year ago had no issue with telling everyone within earshot his salary, much to the consternation of those more experienced who made less. You could mention it face-to-face, but I wouldn't put it in the letter specifically... just to cover your bases, you could write something in the footer like "The information contained within this letter is to be considered for your eyes only...".

If you have to sit him down like a little kid and explain in detail everything he should / should not discuss, you should reconsider hiring him for your particular environment.

That said, you shouldn't feel guilty about paying a more capable (but younger) person more money... there's a reason you're compensating this guy more than the other techs, right? If this guy is not more capable, well, then you have a hiring issue that will not bode well long-term for your company. Info will get out, what matters is how the information is viewed by all involved. If you have good-natured people and your choice to offer this guy more money in the long-term was based upon solid logic, it will be a non-issue. If at least one of your employees is not good-natured, well, expect a LOT of turmoil when the truth comes out.

Dan - Owner
http://www.Hi-TecDesigns.com

RE: Salary Confidentiality

(OP)
Thanks for your input. Everyone in our office is good natured and I don't think it would be a problem. I wouldn't specifically sit him down to just go over that one point, but more along the lines saying "We'd appreciate if you would keep your salary information private in the office" during his orientation the first day and be done with it. I know at my last two jobs no one talked about salaries. I guess maybe I have a bad taste in my mouth from the last service guy who would go around asking the other service guys at our company and the other tenants in the same building how much they made and bragging how much more he could be making doing electrical contract work. We fired him a few months ago and he's back doing electrical contracting work making "80K" but somehow still has to live with his grandma. I should say the other guy in the office is a "service guy" not a "technical guy". Thanks again.

RE: Salary Confidentiality

I was confronted with a situation like this years ago when I was running a pre-sales support group in Detroit. I hired an engineer for our Milwaukee office and while company policy stated that no one was to share the details of their compensation with any other employee, which was pretty standard faire whevever I had worked. Anyway, I paid this guy a fairly good salary because he was both very qualified and he was going to be the only pre-sales guy in our Milwaukee sales office and so he had to be a self starter which I was assured that he was.

However, the problem was that his older brother also worked for the company, in another city reporting to a different manager (it was from his brother that the guy I hired had even heard about the job in the first place). Anyway, a few weeks later I got an irate phone call from my fellow manager complaining that I should have made it clear that salaries were to be kept confidential and it seems that the guy I hired had told his older brother what he was being paid and it turned out to be significantly more than he was making despite having worked for the company for five years or so. And to add insult to injury, his kid brother was given a higher level job title, Consultant versus Associate-Consultant (which I always considered an entry level position for someone with little or no relevant experience which was NOT the case for the guy I had just hired, thus the level I hired him at). I tried to explain to the other manager that it was naive to think that you could keep brothers from sharing information like that and besides, I had no idea what the old brother made nor for that matter what his exact title was since he didn't work for me and I felt no obligation to double-check salaries that were being paid to people who did not report to my part of organization. I never got into any trouble over this since my boss understood completly and besides I had been told to hire the best people I could find and the salary and title given was well within the guidelines for that position so I was covered, but that other manager never forgave me. It seems he had to promote the older brother and give him a big raise, something he probably should have done years before since he had not promoted his employee from that entry-level position he started at five years earlier, so in the end I never felt sorry for what I did winky smile

Anyway, the point is that even if it's formal company policy, you can't really expect people to remain mum about stuff like this.

John R. Baker, P.E.
Product 'Evangelist'
Product Engineering Software
Siemens PLM Software Inc.
Industry Sector
Cypress, CA
Siemens PLM:
UG/NX Museum:

To an Engineer, the glass is twice as big as it needs to be.

RE: Salary Confidentiality

I worked at a company that had the (normal) "you can't talk about your salary" policy. One of the guys working for me did not like this policy. When he got his salary advice (with the raise percentage on it) he tapped it to his door for everyone to see. It stayed up for a couple of days and then mysteriously disappeared. The year after he did this the first time, the best raise I could get for him was exactly one full percent below the minimum of the recommended range. He posted it on his door. The next year the best I could do was 2 percent below the minimum of the range. He was pissed. I told him that management has a long memory and if he posts this one he should expect next year to be 3 percent below minimum and if the minimum is below 3% then he should expect a pay cut. He started yelling at me that it was "unfair". I told him to do what he wanted. He didn't post it. The next year his raise was in the middle of the range. During that year we had layoffs and he was at the top of everyone's list. Not a bad guy, pretty good at his job, unwilling to even give lip service to policy. A liability that I didn't need.

Bottom line is that the policies are absolutely unenforceable. You are better off having a talk with him and letting the cards fall where they may.

David Simpson, PE
MuleShoe Engineering

"Belief" is the acceptance of an hypotheses in the absence of data.
"Prejudice" is having an opinion not supported by the preponderance of the data.
"Knowledge" is only found through the accumulation and analysis of data.
The plural of anecdote is not "data"

RE: Salary Confidentiality

Do you have an employee manual/policy? These are the sorts of things that should be spelled out in the manual.

I can't really think of a time when someone's salary was the subject of a discussion, unless it was about what we thought a particularly obnoxious manager was making. Generally, companies will have salary ranges for different job grades posted, and that's generally enough to satisfy most peoples' curiosity. Given the unique situation you have with this employee, I think a discussion about the ramifications of revealing his salary should be in order.

People will and can find out, eventually, and there are always soreheads in any sizable group of people. I got lots of negative vibes from a couple of technicians at one job, because I was making more than them, and it appeared to them that I had a cushier job. The difference, of course, was that I was a BSEE-to-be, and they were high school dropouts, but that wasn't ever in their considerations.

TTFN
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

Need help writing a question or understanding a reply? forum1529: Translation Assistance for Engineers

RE: Salary Confidentiality

I wouldn't mention it (not talking about salary) at all. Most people just naturally want to keep it a secret and if you mention something to him, he might be curious about what the big deal is.
We had a guy here who printed his pay stub on a common printer and didn't pick it up. Most of the people who looked at it (after it was conveniently pinned to the wall), weren't mad about the amount, but that the guy was printing it out at all.
If there is a good reason to pay someone less than someone else, just be prepared to explain it. If they ask, you'll have your case ready. It might be uncomfortable, but it also might be a teachable moment.

RE: Salary Confidentiality

5
I'd like to post everyone's salary on the company bulletin board. It would cut down on the rumors, exaggerations, and flat-out lies that co-workers tell to one another. Anybody on board with me?

That said, I'll quote my dad from his first day on the job (back in 1938):

Boss: Ralph, we make it a policy not to talk about salaries around here.

Dad: Don't worry, Mr. Merriwether, I'm embarrassed about it too.

Best to you,

Goober Dave

Haven't see the forum policies? Do so now: Forum Policies

RE: Salary Confidentiality

(OP)
Thanks for everyone's replies. We don't have a company handbook yet, but we are getting one made for next year. I agree that if someone is curious enough, salary information will get out, especially with sites like glassdoor. Perhaps a "no-whining" policy enforced by instant termination would be better. Thanks again.

RE: Salary Confidentiality

Medeski (Mechanical)
enforcing a " do not discuss your salary.", policy is like trying to herd cats. As both an employee, and an employer, no matter what you say or do about this, sooner or later the information will get out.
If you terminate the leakers, you may find that instead of people you think are just mal-contents, you may find some of your better people involved.
The better way is to post an official attitude of " You are paid what you are worth to the company.", with a note that if you want more, find ways of being more valuable to the company.
B.E.

You are judged not by what you know, but by what you can do.

RE: Salary Confidentiality

In most of our proposals we have overhead rates directly associated with names; not much to hide there.

RE: Salary Confidentiality

(OP)
Berkshire - I'm sure that you're correct. We are a new, small company so we don't have any policies in place yet. I was being a bit facetious with my "whining=instant" termination remark, though after a rather sour experience I know now it's best to nip negative attitudes in the bud, even it's against my nature to be confrontational. We are in an "at will employment" state after all and if someone is constantly complaining they should be making more, they are more than welcome to find another job that would remunerate them "fairly".

RE: Salary Confidentiality

Medeski (Mechanical)
If you have someone constantly complaining they should be making more, sit down with them, to see if there is any basis in fact.
I got into this scenario with an employer many years ago who essentially told me to put my money where my mouth is. I left his employ and got a job with his next door neighbor, at 50% more than I was making with him.
As an employer I have also lost good employees to other companies. These employees left for the same money, but much better health plans, that I had no way of matching.
With the current health plan turmoil, I can see this happening again.
B.E.

You are judged not by what you know, but by what you can do.

RE: Salary Confidentiality

Let people be as petty as they need to be, then keep the ones who aren't.

RE: Salary Confidentiality

My reactions to most salary secrecy discussions:

Divide and conquer.

What makes the EE new-hire worth more than other employees? When it becomes a struggle to get a fair days pay for a fair days work then it's not fair anymore. I am not big on deal-cutting all over the office. Do the most assertive deserve more than the best qualified? I don't like negotiating, it's not my thing; however, I think that I deserve to be fairly compensated. I believe that a salary review for all employees in the office is in order instead of a gag-order on salary discussion. If the company can only afford to fairly compensate one employee, then something is wrong.

RE: Salary Confidentiality

(OP)
dvd - I feel that everyone in the office is being compensated fairly. Of the 6 people in the office, 3 (including myself) take little if any salary as we are part owners. Of the remaining, one is a service technician that is a hard worker, reliable and making above market level for that position and the others are accounting and sales manager which I don't really deal with their salaries. The EE will also be making a fair salary, but in a year or two will probably be making more than the service technician if he performs well. I guess I wasn't sure if it was standard to have any office policies in place regarding salaries. According to the previous posts, it seems like even if there is, they are aren't followed by most people anyway.

RE: Salary Confidentiality

FlashSet…

In the 1990s I worked for a large engineering company that did the same thing. Each time I prepared a fee proposal, I had to call each person on the project team and ask them how much they made. There were no mysteries and, frankly, no surprises. However, none of us liked it very much. Most other places I have worked binned people into groups (e.g. Principal Engineer, Senior Engineer, etc) with set billing rates.

==========
"Is it the only lesson of history that mankind is unteachable?"
--Winston S. Churchill

RE: Salary Confidentiality

I'm of the younger generation and I wouldn't dream of sharing salary info around the office! I thought this was understood...but I guess not. In my mind, you compare you salary to industry, not a particular company. If you find your company isn't compensating you to the average, or isn't providing you with other intangible benefits to make up for it, then you think about leaving. But I never would think of sharing salary info around the office!

PE, SE
Eastern United States

"If a builder builds a house for someone, and does not construct it properly, and the house which he built falls in and kills its owner, then that builder shall be put to death!"
~Code of Hammurabi

RE: Salary Confidentiality

Well that's you. In a large company it seems unlikely that wage negotiations would proceed in a fair fashion if only one side knows all the information. BTDT. On the other hand in a smaller company we negotiated a certain formula for pay rises, and when an external change occurred, voluntarily accepted a 33% reduction in that formula.

Cheers

Greg Locock


New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm?

RE: Salary Confidentiality

Unfortunately, it's one of those human nature things. Whatever arrangement you were satisfied with prior, becomes unsatisfactory if you find out that Joe Blow got 5% more.

I don't think I've ever known what a peer made, unless it was by accident or by inference from the contract rate we charged someone. Most of anything else is moot; there's only a couple of people who do anything comparable to what I do in the company.

TTFN
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

Need help writing a question or understanding a reply? forum1529: Translation Assistance for Engineers

RE: Salary Confidentiality

The best people to talk to about salary are the people getting ready to leave. If they're leaving because they're generally unhappy, it's possible their salary is too low for the trouble they get into. If they're generally happy and just found something a bit different to try, it's possible their salary is pretty good. If you're friendly with these people, you can "share" salary info either shortly before are somewhat after they leave. I do this whenever possible, and not only does it give me useful info on how I stack up, it also tends to prevent long-term hurt feelings because they're leaving anyway. I typically stay in touch with these people long-term.

Surprisingly enough, the ones you think are making a killing usually aren't. In some positions I learned I was way under budget (leading me to negotiate better the next time around), while at others I learned I was poking through the glass ceiling (which gave me good leverage with the next company).

Dan - Owner
http://www.Hi-TecDesigns.com

RE: Salary Confidentiality

I have a Dilbert hanging in my office- the one where the boss says, "It is our policy to hire only the very best technical professionals." Dilbert asks, "Is it not also our policy to pay the industry average?" The boss replies, "Right, we like them bright, but clueless.".

What we notice here is that the "professionals" tend to strictly adhere to the policy of holding salaries and other compensation confidential. The people in our shop absolutely do not, some going to the extent of showing one another not only their pay slips but also their bonus cheques. The professionals are very likely happier without knowing how much each of them makes relative to the other, but I'm not entirely sure they're smarter...

Negotiating salary with your employer is a sort of prisoner's dilemma, in that you usually have neither sufficient power nor sufficient information to negotiate effectively. A salary survey based on sufficient data to be reasonably accurate, combined with an intimate knowledge of exactly what you earn or save for your employer, is invaluable.

RE: Salary Confidentiality

Yes, which is precisely why the union is rapidly gaining members among the engineers at my workplace, their first survey revealed discrepancies between what the company told us and what is actually happening (eg minimum wage for an engineer is X. Oh, what about these 3 people? The average pay for this grade is Y, no it isn't it is less than that by a statistically significant margin). I am looking forward with great interest to the pay negotiations in 5 years time when the vast majority of our non engineer payroll will have been made redundant, and unionised engineers will be the majority voice at the negotiations. If I were management I'd be a little nervous. I haven't joined...yet.

Cheers

Greg Locock


New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm?

RE: Salary Confidentiality

As a public employee, my salary is posted on the internet, as is every other public employee in the State. I don't see a problem with sharing salary information.

RE: Salary Confidentiality

their first survey revealed discrepancies between what the company told us and what is actually happening (eg minimum wage for an engineer is X. Oh, what about these 3 people?

yeah, or the new hire gets a significantly bigger starting salary and after first promotion (from junior) gets a higher pay then an engineer with x years in the office.

RE: Salary Confidentiality

loki - If the new hire is notably more effective than the engineer with x years in the office (or is a high-demand specialty), she deserves the higher pay.

RE: Salary Confidentiality

True, but if external factors make it necessary to offer higher salaries to new graduates then it takes a long time for that effect to trickle through the system, and that is one thing that's been happening.

In theory it all gets levelled out over time bt forced ranking. If you believe that then I have a bride to sell you.

...or a bridge.

Cheers

Greg Locock


New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm?

RE: Salary Confidentiality

The company that I used to work for had a "compression" process where they calculated the average offer for Engineers during the recruiting season and compared it to the previous year. If this year was higher than last year, the percent difference was applied to all in-place Engineers. So if you had been working for a while, a 10% compression raise could be serious money, we were all rooting for the new grads to get GREAT offers. The company stopped that practice in 1986 when the industry crashed and we laid off 1/3 of the Engineers immediately (and another 1/3 over the next few years) and stopped hiring for 14 years. At the end of the depression they didn't re-institute the compression raises.

David Simpson, PE
MuleShoe Engineering

"Belief" is the acceptance of an hypotheses in the absence of data.
"Prejudice" is having an opinion not supported by the preponderance of the data.
"Knowledge" is only found through the accumulation and analysis of data.
The plural of anecdote is not "data"

RE: Salary Confidentiality

When I was a manager back, during my McDonnell Douglas days, what you would do is hire new people at the highest salary that you could get HR to agree to, however you'd let the new employees know that they probably wouldn't be getting much of a raise that first year, if at all. The reason for this was that when it came time to give out annual raises to your group you'd be given a 'pool' of money which was based on a set percentage (the same across the entire company) of the your department's combined salaries (the sum total of all your people's salaries). This way that first year after you'd hired someone, that person's portion of the 'pool' was now available to you as a manager to spread the wealth around the rest of your people, perhaps addressing some disparities where an actual promotion was not practical (promotion money was always above and beyond the raise 'pool').

Over time, following this process allowed you to increase your share of the company's annual raise 'pool' to the benefit of all your people. What was amazing was that some managers went out of their way to pay the absolute lowest salaries possible, even if it meant selecting lessor qualified people, claiming that this is what 'good' managers were expected to do. However, over time these same managers had to continuously struggle with trying to keep their more qualified people as their salaries would eventual lag the people who worked for managers who, like myself, had admittedly been 'gaming' the system. But as a manager I felt it was my obligation to get the most for my people even if it meant that I had to take advantage of a system that could be manipulated to my advantage but which other managers never seemed to catch on as to what was happening or realized how it was hurting them in the long run. BTW, when I was able to get someone a promotion, I would play the same game, getting them the absolute maximum increase that HR would approve and then use their contribution to the raise 'pool' the next time around to help someone else or to raise everyone a bit more than they would have gotten otherwise. If you kept this up, over time it really made a difference.

John R. Baker, P.E.
Product 'Evangelist'
Product Engineering Software
Siemens PLM Software Inc.
Industry Sector
Cypress, CA
Siemens PLM:
UG/NX Museum:

To an Engineer, the glass is twice as big as it needs to be.

RE: Salary Confidentiality

I find all this salary secrecy stuff odd. I'm with the government--my salary is posted on the internet for the whole world to see, as are all my co-workers'. What's the big deal?

RE: Salary Confidentiality

KM,
There is one additional component--your salary is fixed by law and to have your salary shift requires a change in classification. In a company, the boss generally has the latitude to apportion his raise budget, individuals getting more than the average raise results in others getting less than the average raise. The "less than" folks tend to feel less valued and can start demonstrating that feeling in bad ways. Confidential salaries minimizes that chaos.

David Simpson, PE
MuleShoe Engineering

Law is the common force organized to act as an obstacle of injustice Frédéric Bastiat

RE: Salary Confidentiality

Yes, for instance where I work the band for a senior engineer varies from about $X to $1.9X, and the overlap between grades means that it is quite common to have someone in the same department in a lower grade who makes more than someone on the next grade up. Interestingly our competitors have a rigid array of grades with decimal points in them, and the pay for each subgrade is fixed and known, so if you talk to Bob who is a 4.3 then you can easily find out how much he's paid. I'm somewhat agnostic on whether that is a better system in practice, but the majority seem to think so I guess in a couple of years we'll be switching over.

Cheers

Greg Locock


New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm?

RE: Salary Confidentiality

Link
This is worth looking at.

RE: Salary Confidentiality

My employer uses a similar method as GregLocock explained. Everyone is assigned a category and grade. E.G. Engineer 2. They publish the salary ranges of all categories and grades so you can estimate what someone is getting paid if you really want to. I've never seen it be an issue. I think it's a good method, keeps everything in check without singling out people.

In a related note - there was a period of about 5 or 6 years where there were no new hires in my department (before I started). When they started hiring again, they offered hiring bonuses to new employees. Not huge but once it came out that the new guys got bonuses, there was some complaints from people who were there 10+ years. But that's how the industry changed over those years, I think hiring bonuses are a standard practice now.

RE: Salary Confidentiality

My son told a story over Thanksgiving about a friend of his that interviewed at a company, and was about to receive a verbal offer, when he mentioned that he had an offer from another company F.

HR: "Oh, let's pause and let me ask you how much lower you might go" -- company F starting salaries are ~$100k this year
interviewee: "I suppose I could drop $15k"
HR: "Oh, I don't think we're going to be able to match that"

So, not every company in Silicon Valley has deep pockets...

TTFN
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

Need help writing a question or understanding a reply? forum1529: Translation Assistance for Engineers

RE: Salary Confidentiality

The only 'signing bonus' I got 42 years ago when I took my first job out of college was that I was given credit for the 25 months for which I had co-oped for the company over the 6 years that I was working on my degree full time. At the time all that it meant was the I qualified for the 5 and 10 year automatic increases in your annual allotted vacation days a couple of years sooner than you would normally have. However, when I left the company back in 1980 to join the organization for whom I still work, that meant that my official time with the company was 11 years not something shy of 9 years. And since you had to be there for 10 years or more to lock-in any future payments from the company's defined-benefit pension plan, in end it made a significant difference although at the time I didn't think much of it since I was only 33 years old and you couldn't start drawing a pension until you were 65. And while the company has since been bought-out and basically dismantled for it's pieces and parts, the pension plan lived on in some sort of escrow account because when I turned 65 last year I got a notice that it was time for me to start taking my pension payments. Granted, I didn't earn a lot back then and it was technically for only 9 years but with those additional 25 months added on, I'm now collecting an extra $145 a month (which is taxable as regular income) that I wouldn't have been getting at all if they had not given me that 'bonus' 42+ years ago.

Note that I'm also getting a significantly larger (and also taxable) pension for my 11+ years with McDonnell Douglas, again which I had to start taking at age 65 since it too was a defined-benefit pension. Now my EDS pension was converted years ago into a 'cash account' which continues to draw interest even though no new contributions have been made since EDS sold our company. Now the advantage of this plan is that, like other tex-deferred pension plans such as 401k's and IRA's, you don't have to start taking payments until you reach 70 1/2 so I've got a few years to let that grow (without incurring any immediate tax liabilities) before I have to start making withdrawls.

I guess one thing this all proves is that someone, somewhere must have been doing their jobs since in the end, I'll be drawing pensions from THREE companies which no longer even exist.

John R. Baker, P.E.
Product 'Evangelist'
Product Engineering Software
Siemens PLM Software Inc.
Industry Sector
Cypress, CA
Siemens PLM:
UG/NX Museum:

To an Engineer, the glass is twice as big as it needs to be.

RE: Salary Confidentiality

I'm thinking about how to approach my colluegues about wage. I want to have an accurate impression of how I rank within the company. I just missed a chanve to talk to a leaving colluegue and I don't think a new one will come up soon. Till now wage confidentiality was pretty tight around here, or maybe there's just a culture og beeing tight-lipped around this issue.
But how would I approach my mates in such an environment?

Btw, I recently talked to a guy who works blue-collar in a huge organization, he knew the wages of many of his mates and told me they discussed these things pretty freely and support each other in gaining better wages. When I worked public service, the wage of everyone was basically public - you just looked it up in a table, and again there's was a culture od supportingo ne another with the little bits and pieces that might add a little something. So I'm pretty sure that as an employee, a culture with little confidentiality is a good thing in the long run.

RE: Salary Confidentiality

If someone flat out asked me what I made, I wouldn't answer. I'd have to know them really well, consider their reason for asking, and expect reciprocation for their salary. I usually learn at least one person's salary at every job I've been at. Generally, you lead into it over a period of weeks/months discussing similar topics (it's starting to sound like dating and sex wink ).

Dan - Owner
http://www.Hi-TecDesigns.com

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources