×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Two-way slab design for point loads

Two-way slab design for point loads

Two-way slab design for point loads

(OP)
I wanted to see if anyone has any good literature on two-way slab design for point loads. I know that there is AASHTO for deck design using one axle or point loads, but these point loads a are smaller. Every example I've ever seen on two-way slab design is for uniformly distributed loads. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

RE: Two-way slab design for point loads

There are quite a few threads on this site discussing this. There are even a few I started and contributed to a few years back. You should search for those, but basically your choices are performing a yield line analysis (try MacGregor & Wight's, "Reinforced Concrete - Mechanics and Design") and obtaining design shears and moments from a FEM analysis. For the latter you should seek out Wood, R.H., “The Reinforcement of Slabs in Accordance with a Pre-Determined Field of Moments" for the original theoretical treatment. For a more modern interpretation you can check this out:

A Finite Element Approach to Reinforced Concrete Slab Design in GT STRUDL

RE: Two-way slab design for point loads

Apply equivalent uniform loads for your point loads to analyze the overall slab bending.

Check punching shear for the local point loads. Concrete is so good at redistributing, I would model as uniform.

If it is point loads at midspan, then find the equivalent uniform load to match the same moments.

Anyway, I didn't read the literature but I would think you could apply some logic and come up with a reasonable approach.

RE: Two-way slab design for point loads

Use the equivalent frame method. It is simpler than yield lines or doing full-blown fea. Basically look at the slab as a "beam" that makes a moment-resisting frame with the columns.

RE: Two-way slab design for point loads

It would depend how big the point loads are compared to the remainder of the loading.

For relatively small point loads, especially if they are applied in the middle strip area, then equivalent frame or other simplified methods with distribution of effects into column and middle strips are ok. If the point loads are in the column strip area, they should not be distributed normally as their effect should be contained within the column strip and not distributed to the middle strip.

If they are relatively large point loads as in a transfer slab, then FE analysis to determine the distribution and reinforce accordingly for the concentrations in different areas of the slab.

RE: Two-way slab design for point loads

Conservatively speaking, I don't see that this would be much different than analyzing a two way steel beam system.

Just figure in the appropriate slab width in each direction based on the width of the point load, add in the other uniform loads over the same width strips, get the moments and reactions and design the reinforcing steel. No worries.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering

RE: Two-way slab design for point loads

It all depends doesn't it? Two-way slab systems are almost always continuous and monolithic, so the accuracy of any approximate method truly is relative to several variables, including the magnitude of point loads and the column layout. With a rectangular layout of column bays and relatively small point loads then you can simplify this problem to a certain extent. However, oversimplifying could lead to failing to recognize non-uniform punching shears and the effects of sudden stiffness (reinforcing) changes in a slab.

I humbly disagree that the Equivalent Frame Analysis method is always easier than FEA. With modern software it can be easier to make a reliable FEA plate model than it is to do discrete frame analyses with the Equivalent Frame Analysis method and marry your results together, especially if your office uses solid modeling as opposed to 2D drafting as we do. Approximate methods were formulated to 'approximate' what a reliable FEA model would provide for you internally... At the end of the day it depends on the exact problem parameters and what tools you have at your disposal.

RE: Two-way slab design for point loads

Nobody has yet suggested Hillerborg's strip method. But I do.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources