×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Hydroflow vs. HydroCAD vs. HEC-HMS for Design of Ponds

Hydroflow vs. HydroCAD vs. HEC-HMS for Design of Ponds

Hydroflow vs. HydroCAD vs. HEC-HMS for Design of Ponds

(OP)
I am looking for some guidance on what programs may be best to design multiple ponds in series with pipes in between.

http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=142974

That thread has some great information about HydroCAD, Hydroflow, Pondpack, HEC-HMS, etc., but is from 2005-2006.

We already have Hydroflow (as it is packaged with AutoCAD Civil 3D 2009) and I am wondering if purchasing HydroCAD would be advantageous. Pondpack is too expense (and complicated) and it seems like the other programs mentioned in the thread were not recommended as much.

I used HydroCAD five years ago when I was right out of school at another company and remember it being very user friendly.

Any help would be much appreciated!

Thanks - Jennifer

RE: Hydroflow vs. HydroCAD vs. HEC-HMS for Design of Ponds

HydroCAD will definitely handle interconnected ponds with variable tailwater. Just route one pond directly to the next using the DSI routing procedure. For details see www.hydrocad.net/tailwater.htm

I believe that Hydraflow is limited to fixed tailwater conditions, so it cannot be used for interconnected ponds.

Peter Smart
HydroCAD Software
www.hydrocad.net

RE: Hydroflow vs. HydroCAD vs. HEC-HMS for Design of Ponds

EPA SWMM 5 offers a Full Dynamic wave routing option that solves the complete one dimensional St Venant equations (continuity, momentum and volume)that is very good for routing through multiple connected ponds. The Dynamic Wave routing option can handle, backwater flow reversals, channel storage, conduit pressurization, downstream diversions and looped networks.

RE: Hydroflow vs. HydroCAD vs. HEC-HMS for Design of Ponds

EPA SWMM is the gold standard, and it's free, but it's awfully damn complicated and if you don't know what you're doing, you could easily make an error with your model. I don't know off the top of my head how good its output is. I know XP-SWMM's printouts are wretched, leading any engineer intending to produce reports in a professional manner to have to port all the raw data into Excel and build your own graphs and figures. Huge headache.

Hydrology, Drainage Analysis, Flood Studies, and Complex Stormwater Litigation for Atlanta and the South East - http://www.campbellcivil.com

RE: Hydroflow vs. HydroCAD vs. HEC-HMS for Design of Ponds

I find HMS easy to deal with.

But it might not be the best choice for a "detailed system".

I have SewerGEMS too. But can't recommend it!

RE: Hydroflow vs. HydroCAD vs. HEC-HMS for Design of Ponds

HEC-HMS does not account for backwater effects. In its reservoir model, it assumes the outlet is under inlet control.

RE: Hydroflow vs. HydroCAD vs. HEC-HMS for Design of Ponds

Yes it does.
The outflow is a function of the upstream water-surface elevation.

HEC RAS for unsteady flow.

RE: Hydroflow vs. HydroCAD vs. HEC-HMS for Design of Ponds

Yes it does.
The outflow is a function of the upstream water-surface elevation.


That is called inlet control. HEC-HMS is a kinematic, cascading flow model, that does not account for backwater effects.

RE: Hydroflow vs. HydroCAD vs. HEC-HMS for Design of Ponds

Sorry that's what I meant... no backwater.

But ... maybe he don't need it.

RE: Hydroflow vs. HydroCAD vs. HEC-HMS for Design of Ponds

If he doesn't know whether he needs it or not, then he needs it. :/

Hydrology, Drainage Analysis, Flood Studies, and Complex Stormwater Litigation for Atlanta and the South East - http://www.campbellcivil.com

RE: Hydroflow vs. HydroCAD vs. HEC-HMS for Design of Ponds

But I'd recommend HEC RAS. It could probably simulate "multiple ponds in series with pipes in between".

RE: Hydroflow vs. HydroCAD vs. HEC-HMS for Design of Ponds

I absolutely would not recommend HEC-RAS for pond routing.

Hydrology, Drainage Analysis, Flood Studies, and Complex Stormwater Litigation for Atlanta and the South East - http://www.campbellcivil.com

RE: Hydroflow vs. HydroCAD vs. HEC-HMS for Design of Ponds

Design multiple ponds in series with pipes in between

Meant HEC HMS !

RE: Hydroflow vs. HydroCAD vs. HEC-HMS for Design of Ponds

Oh, then no, HMS definitely doesn't do that, unless the first pond is way up on a hill and the WSE in the lower pond never affects the upper one. If you're looking for Free Government Software that does that, your only option to my knowledge is EPA-SWMM. If you're looking for Cheap Downloadable Software that does it, Peter's software does a reasonable job.

Hydrology, Drainage Analysis, Flood Studies, and Complex Stormwater Litigation for Atlanta and the South East - http://www.campbellcivil.com

RE: Hydroflow vs. HydroCAD vs. HEC-HMS for Design of Ponds

Maybe that lower pond doesn't affect the upper pond?? Who knows (apart jvilbig)
E.g. Series of ponds, with height difference, connected with culvert (pipes)/stream.

Then it could be solved with hydrological routing methods (ex.: Kinematic Wave) with or without tailwater information (rating curve, fix stage) in HMS.

HEC RAS can do it too (but wasn't mention as an option).
I don't say I'd recommend it, but it can do the job.
It might actually be easier to define the caracteristics of the discharge control (inline structure) with RAS than SWMM. Then using area-elevation or volume-elevation information and a correct discharge rating curve should be ok for a "pond". Pipe could be set as culverts (I'm thinking they're) + any stream section.

HydroCAD do that actually... You have to specity a culvert outlet device on the upper pond.
Sorry but HMS can do that... Ouflow structure with culvert, spillway, dam tops, pumps, etc.
RAS can do that too...

Not sure SWMM is the best software to do that - How do you define a pond in SWMM?? A large trapezoidal channel ?? Can you define a spillway as in HMS or RAS (OGEE, Broaded, Sharp + Gates).

RE: Hydroflow vs. HydroCAD vs. HEC-HMS for Design of Ponds

How do you define a pond in SWMM??A large trapezoidal channel ??

Storage Unit

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources