×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Bearing Capacity Assessment Method - Independent Slab of Portal Framed Building

Bearing Capacity Assessment Method - Independent Slab of Portal Framed Building

Bearing Capacity Assessment Method - Independent Slab of Portal Framed Building

(OP)
Hi Everyone,

I am a graduate engineer with one years experience with my company. I am involved with a project now that involves the re-construction of a internal slab of a portal framed building. The portal columns are supported on isolated pads with the internal slab poured independently. The reason for the reconstruction of the slab is that the building is an earthquake damaged building in Christchurch, New Zealand. We are also investigating the potential to re-level column pads with screw piles but that is another days topic.

So to my question. In Christchurch here there is a method/guidance paper that is used to assess the bearing capacity for small structures. Its called the Stockwell Method. Attached is a copy of the paper. In summary, its based off Scala Penetrometer blows per 150mm which is plotted on a graph that gives an allowable bearing capacity. We are proposing to undertake 4 hand auger tests with scala penetrometer testing throughout and extending to 2m beyond the base of the borehole. Usually in ChCh the HAs collapse at around 2m due to the high GW and loose sand material.

My question is, would it be appropriate to use this Stockwell method to assess the bearing capacity for the design of a new slab? I was thinking that this would be acceptable as the loads will be relatively light. The building is a plastics factory, approx 500 sq meters.
If you guys think this method is appropriate i have some questions on the method itself but will see what the initial response is.

I also have a CPT on a neighbouring site, approximately 50m away, that I will assess the bearing capacity using Robertsons method for comparison. If anyone is interested, I will attach my calcs for people to have a look. In work we have correlations for converting scala blows to phi etc so I will also check the bearing using the Terzaghi or Meryhoff methods. My usual work was just report writing for the rebuild of earthquake damage houses. Usually the bearing capacity is based on the guidance document in Christchurch i.e. 2 blows per 100mm = 200kPa and 5 blows per 100mm = 300kPa so assessing bearing capacity using these types of methods is a little new to me so please pardon my lack of knowledge. Also please pardon my metric units, its all i know!!!

At the end of the day all my work will be reviewed by my senior engineer so i will ask for his advice throughout the project also but i just said id ask here for another perspective.

Any advice is much appreciated.
Regards

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources