×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Retaing Wall

Retaing Wall

Retaing Wall

(OP)
There is a typical 4m cantilever retaining wall which is back filled 3m thus has a "free-board" of 1m
There is a scenario that water can rise at the side of the back fill up to the wall's crest.
The back fill is relatively permeable. It is clear that the relevant Mononobe Okabe formula will apply for both the soil and water.
Using the Ewd=(7/12)*Kh*γw*H with H=3m
and then Westergraad's formula (7/8)*kh*γw*sqrt(h*z) with h=1 freeboard
Inertia forces will act on the soil mass with weight (γsat-γwater)?

RE: Retaing Wall

I'm really just venting here. But, this is a 4 meter wall with only 1 meter difference in the soil on either side, right? This wall is basically embedded in the soil. Won't this wall just move with the earth during the seismic event?

It seems to me that Mononabe-Okabe is crazy conservative in cases like this. I'm seeing more an more engineers designing simple retaining walls for seismic forces like this. Is that because there isn't any other guidance out there, or is it because they really feel like the wall needs to be designed for these kind of forces?

RE: Retaing Wall

Josh,
I don't know anything about Mononabe-Okabe, but the way I read his post, the wall is 4 metres high above the low side, backfilled 3 metres, leaving a 1 metre "parapet".

RE: Retaing Wall

Hokie -

Yeah.... Let me wipe that egg from my face. I don't know how I could have read it the other way.

Reading it the correct way, this is probably one of the few cases where I would agree with Mononabe-Okabe for the calculation of seismic loads. You've got the water pressure on one side vs the other. That can be problematic during a seismic event.

But, if you take the water away, my previous comment still holds to some degree. I'm seeing a lot of engineers get excited about seismic for retaining walls recently. But, when I was a newbie seismic loads were almost always ignored. That's because the wall was assumed to move with the soil. It's like a foundation with no super-structure. Were there some big failures that I'm not aware of that are causing this new concern?

RE: Retaing Wall

(OP)
The structure, an inverted frame with "wings" Please see attached pdf.
The structure is located in an area with pga 0.43, hence earthquake loads can not be ignored

RE: Retaing Wall

The seismic earth pressure (applicable only to soil) is 0.375*Kh*Gamma*H^2 and it applies at H/3 above the bottom of the footing. As mentioned earlier, walls designed for static earth pressures and surcharges with adequate safety factors in stability analysis have performed well after a seismic event.

http://www.soilstructure.com/

RE: Retaing Wall

(OP)
OkEY in applying Seed & Whitman's formula.
You add to your Active Earth Pressure and Hydrostatic the Earthquake augmentation part and the Hydrodynamic
Does Seed and Whitman has the same triangular distribution as Active Earth Pressures;
Inertia of the structure and back fill supported on the footing shouldn;t be ignored,as the design is per Eurocodes.

RE: Retaing Wall

(OP)
Much appreciated the info provided about the publications and your posts
Thanks a lot Fixed Earth.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources