×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Sealed drawings ownership
5

Sealed drawings ownership

Sealed drawings ownership

(OP)
I have been working with Engineering drawing for the past 20 some years. I working with document control not engineering.. Anyways I was wondering if we hire an engineering firm for a project and they summit a sealed set of drawings who is required to keep this sealed drawing for record?

We have our own engineering drawing management system and this question comes up several times.

Is it an owner legel responsiblity to keep a record of the sealed drawings or is it the Engineering firms???

Clint

RE: Sealed drawings ownership

Hmmm. I waould also liek to know the legalities of this one.

RE: Sealed drawings ownership

I am not aware of any legal requirement to save a set of drawings, I am from OHIO so it could differ in other states.

RE: Sealed drawings ownership

In my experience, the owner rarely has drawings. When doing rehab or additions or investigations i will be lucky if i can salvage up half of a set of drawings, but 30% of the time they have no drawings if the facility is greater than 10 years old.

I like to think it is the Engineers responsibility for a self-liability issue. If something occurs the Engineering firm should want their drawings to show what they required and it can be used in court for protection. And now of days we are talking a digital set on a server and a hard disk backup.

RE: Sealed drawings ownership

But once a project is done, I dont think its legally required you keep drawings. Some financial stuff yes, but drawings, I dont think so. I have heard some folks soon as the building is opened, they get rid of calcs. That way there is no liability from them, they can recreate if needed.

As an engineer its our responsibility to make sure a building densest fall down. I don't think the law requires us to prove it in a written fashion. So clients do, but legally we don't have to do calcs.

RE: Sealed drawings ownership

ztenguy, i agree with what you stated. I did not mean to present it as we are required to keep it all. I would keep only plans and documents; so the documents that i provided during construction state what the members are, connections, details and what the EOR specifies, this way when the construction crews choose to not weld moment frames the EOR can have documents backing their design. But again, as ZT stated. i do not believe that this is a legal requirement.

I don't know if i would ever throw away my calcs, i don't think it is 100% ethical... but i may have to think about this from a litigation standpoint.

RE: Sealed drawings ownership

As others have stated, I don't know if there is a legal obligation for the owner or engineer to keep the drawings. But I think it is a good a idea for the both to keep the drawings. I have the same experience as Eric...owners never have drawings. I'm not sure why they don't keep them. Maybe they don't appreciate the importance of them or the convenience of having them for future renovations. An engineer should keep them for reasons stated and if nothing else as a reference for future work.

ztengguy, what is the logic behind no calcs = no liability? It seems to me that if you provide a faulty design and it is shown on the drawings then you are on the hook for that faulty design whether you have the calcs or not.

RE: Sealed drawings ownership

Right, but if something is not faulty, but someone is arguing its a bad design, unhappy, etc. and for whatever reason you get into a litigation, It would put the burden on them to prove that you were wrong. No calcs, no evidence for them to use against you. You dont have to prove your innocence in a court.

RE: Sealed drawings ownership

Caneit,

The argument goes something like this: If you keep the calculations, someone will find some error in them. Likely a small error that doesn't change the design at all. However, if the case goes to court with a jury; the argument will be made that if you (the engineer) made this kind of error, how good could you be. Most of the public thinks that everything engineers do should be perfect, i.e. no errors of any kind and that if you make a mistake you are responsible.

While I understand this arguement, I don't really agree with it. However, this is the possition that many engineering firms are taking.

Mike Lambert

RE: Sealed drawings ownership

I've never been involved in litigation so its interesting to hear the reasons why someone might destroy the calcs. It still seems like it would be better to keep your calcs though...if you have confidence that they are correct and that everything works on paper wouldn't that make their case harder to prove? I can see if you're in a situation where something is questionable on paper but your judgment says that it is okay you might want to get rid of the calculations. Would the lack of calculations in itself be some form of evidence? I'm not saying you're wrong, I just like to see both sides of the story...and as I said I've never been involved in a court case over a design so I'm just taking a guess at this.

RE: Sealed drawings ownership

(OP)
Thanks everyone for you input, interesting comments. I work for a power company and we have several power stations and we keep all the drawings in our drawing management system for future reference and changes that be needed in the life of the facility. When I asked the question in the past I have received mixed comments. Each state has their own rules on Engeineering Seals and even Engineers has rules they follow.

Interesting comments on the design calculations, some of the older stations we have we did get the calcs from the AE. But this was one concern from an AE we worked with on a new Facility, they put up a fight in sending us this information. In the past we have used this informaiton on designing structural changes to the facility. So for us it was very good information to have available for an operating facility.

Thanks again for all the comments.

RE: Sealed drawings ownership

The key is that whatever you do with the calcs and drawings, you have to do it consistently. It has to be your office's standard practice. If you throw some projects out, but keep others you can get buried by lawyers.

We keep drawings and calcs. Seems silly to toss them since one day you may need them and clients tend to frown upon paying you to recreate calcs you should have anyway.

RE: Sealed drawings ownership

I have never understood why a engineer would fight to not give calcs to a client. Hey, im your client, I paid you to do this, I want proof its correct.
I would be looking for a new engineer if I was the client.

RE: Sealed drawings ownership

Over the years I have talked to several attorneys about this question, both inside the company and outside. Each has said to keep calcs, stamped/signed drawings, and other relevant data and files at least until the applicable statute of repose or statute of limitations (if any) has passed. In addition, professional liability carriers may have requirements for document retention. I have seen other posts here on Eng-Tips in which the advice from an attorney is reportedly to destroy drawings, calcs, etc as soon as the job is over, but I think that is terrible advice. I think it is far better to go into court or a settlement conference with, say, a less-than-perfect set of calcs that were at least done to the normal standard of care than to show up with nothing at all.

In structural engineering, where many projects are "one and done," I can at least see the temptation to clear out old files. In my type of civil engineering, where we may consult for a public (or even private) client for years, document retention is vital because the old files are part of the research we do for new projects. I have found relevant data in old job files that were decades old.

Project owners and contractors may keep copies of drawings and any calcs that were sent their way for a period of time after completion (the owner should keep at least the drawings permanently, though many fail to do so). Stamped and signed drawings are also a public record and the reviewing agency may have kept copies in their files; same with stamped and signed calculations that were reviewed by the agency. Some agencies around here will keep these documents for years, while others do not. I once found, in a local city's archives, a 10-year-old set of site civil plans that I needed for information for a new project at an industrial site. The owner of the site had lost his set a couple years before. Thus, destroying plans and calcs can pointless.

BTW, here are NSPE's guidelines for document retention: http://www.nspe.org/resources/pdfs/Licensure/Resou...

==========
"Is it the only lesson of history that mankind is unteachable?"
--Winston S. Churchill

RE: Sealed drawings ownership

2
Ownership of the documents is usually a contractual issue. As an example, in my contractual general conditions, I maintain ownership of all documents produced. There are several reasons for this....most state engineering laws in the US require that the engineer of record maintain all production documents for a certain period of time. In my home state, it is three years. If I give up ownership of the documents, I cannot control how they are used outside of my possession. Further, the engineering laws in the states that require retention of documents also have statues of repose (in my state it is 10 years) and statutes of limitation (4 years in general). Even though you might be statutorially required to only maintain documents for 3 years, it is a good idea to maintain them through a full statute of repose period so that you can defend yourself in the event of a claim.

As for owners or others, I know of no requirement to keep the documents.

RE: Sealed drawings ownership

Previous two posts give good reasons to retain. Here's another one. If sealed drawings are mis-used such as for another project, maybe by alteration to title block etc, the EOR that has kept files is better able to distance themself, recover damages etc.

In the digital age, keeping files doesn't need to take much space.

After decades in business, many times we've found design records that gave us the inside track for new work with prior clients.

RE: Sealed drawings ownership

One engineer above for a power company showed why they needed the old drawings - to start the re-design for changes and building modifications for the next phase or for repairs or replacement of equipment.

If you (as original designer) can tell the owner "We keep the drawings" then You (as bidder for the repair job or extension or replacement project or after-fire-flooding-feast-or-famine repair job) can get the repair job started faster and with a lower bid.

RE: Sealed drawings ownership

First, I'm not a lawyer (but I'd like to play one on TV!). I think the burden of proof that there was negligence is on the plantiff. If there are no calcs/drawings for them to examine, then they would have to hire an expert witness to determine if there was error in design. The defense would then have to rebut the expert witness's testimony by hiring their own expert witness (not you). The debate then comes down to which expert witness is right. It probably doesn't matter how diligent you were in your calcs/drawings. If there was a mistake in design, then you're at fault. Of course, they would first have to prove that the structure was constructed in accordance with your design. If there are no drawings/calcs to reference, then the construction contractor could be at fault (i.e. diversion away from you).

I'm guessing this is where the lawyers get their position of not keeping records.

RE: Sealed drawings ownership

2
I am neither an attorney nor a playwright, but--for a situation in which there are no calcs to reference for a design under scrutiny that requires calcs--I think the trial or settlement conference would play out something like this:

[1] Plaintiff's attorney: "Mr. Engineer, did you perform the necessary __________ calculations for the __________ design in question?"
[2] Mr. Engineer: "Yes."
[3] Plaintiff's attorney (knowing full well via the discovery process that the calcs were destroyed): "May we see these calculations?"
[4] Mr. Engineer: "No. The calculations were destroyed and no longer exist."
[5] Plaintiff's attorney (now getting on his soap box and turning the Mr. Engineer into a shell of his former self): "Why would you DESTROY EVIDENCE that might exonerate you? Are you sure you even did the calculations? What proof can you provide that you actually performed these calculations? What proof can you provide that you performed these calculations properly and to the normal standards of practice and care? What proof can you provide that you were not only not negligent in this matter, but not grossly negligent? TO THE DUNGEON WITH HIM!!!"

I think you can see at this point the very steep mountain the engineer and his attorney must now climb to retrieve this situation and the engineer's reputation. If I sat on the jury hearing this case, I would not be very sympathetic towards the engineer.

==========
"Is it the only lesson of history that mankind is unteachable?"
--Winston S. Churchill

RE: Sealed drawings ownership

I like it, fel3. Don't suppress those hidden talents.

RE: Sealed drawings ownership

Usually this is part of the Laws and Rules of the State requirements. I believe in the State of Florida it is 7 years to maintain the record but as the engineer of record you are responsible for the life of that design or until the design gets modified.

RE: Sealed drawings ownership

fel3- sounds like you have given a deposition before, and it can get way worse than that over far less... attorneys snake

RE: Sealed drawings ownership

Yes, I have given depositions, but fortunately only two. More relevant, though, to my particular experience in this area is that in high school I was on the debate team, which is the normal breeding grounds for attorneys, including my old debate partner and still friend. Also, I have judged probably 200 rounds of high school debate over the years, including about a dozen local National Qualifier final rounds. Some of these high school kids are better than some courtroom attorneys I have witnessed from the jury box. BTW, my high school cranked out--and still cranks out--attorneys like a copy machine (>30 in my class of 535 graduates v. only 3 civil engineers and <10 engineers total; my wife's class the next year produced similar numbers, though only one civil engineer). I remain friends with several of these attorneys, for some unknown reason. smile

Of my two depositions, our calculations and drawings were not relevant to the first and only somewhat relevant to the second. Mostly, it was our other project records and it's a good thing we kept them. I won't go into details, but retained emails, telephone conversation records, etc. got us a win in the first case and greatly reduced damages in the second case because we were able to prove that the client was partly responsible for several errors that increased the cost of a construction project. The crux of both cases, interestingly enough, was the failure of the clients to provide some or all of the information that they had in hand and that they were specifically required to provide PER THE AGREEMENTS (e.g. project requirements, record drawings, past studies, etc).

==========
"Is it the only lesson of history that mankind is unteachable?"
--Winston S. Churchill

RE: Sealed drawings ownership

I agree with fel3 and vmirat about keeping all pertinent documents, drawings, calculations, but i disagree with ztengguy about the client needing to look for another engineer if he does not produce the calculations. I would hold on to my calcs until absolutely needed, and that moment would be in court, when asked to compare with the expert witness' calcs they (the plaintiff hired) provide in court. I won't just hand in my calcs, but i'd rather think of them as my ace in the hole, especially if I am confident in my work. But going to court without any paper trail, no drawings, no calculations is like going to a gunfight without even bringing a knife, but hoping to duck for cover.
On a side note, I once had the owner's field rep who was the site safety guy asking me about sheeting design calculations, after i gave in my sheeting design, and I said to him that my design bears a PE seal, and i assume responsibility for it, and he is not a PE, so he is not even qualified to look over my work, not to mention the fact I want to protect my work. I told him if you don't feel it is safe, you can hire your own engineer, and have him do the calcs, because I work for the site contractor and not the GC or the owner.
This brings up a question, should you show calcs to anyone who demands them? I know NYCDEP (department of environmental protection in NYC) wants to see them for drywells etc, from a document review standpoint before approving plans, so i'm ok with that. But should you show your calcs other than in court when you have to?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources