×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Bringing up to new code with Collar ties

Bringing up to new code with Collar ties

Bringing up to new code with Collar ties

(OP)
If I understand correctly, all rafters not using ridge beam need to have collar ties installed every other rafter to resist uplift of the roof, correct?

If I am analyzing an existing structure for adequacy for additional load am I required to suggest/mandate collar ties to be installed?

If I am suggesting reinforcement (sistering identical members to gain capacity) must I also spec a collar tie to be code compliant (new code).

These houses are like 100 years old, 2x6 rafters on 24" (possibly 16", my notes got wet in a downpour so I went with 24" to be conservative), approx. 15ft slope length, and 7/12 pitch.

Thanks all. I appreciate it

RE: Bringing up to new code with Collar ties

Analyzing a 100 year old structure for "adequacy" is tough as there were no codes back then and the construction was generally pretty minimal for rafters and floor joists. However, I have yet to witness a failure unless they were damaged by moisture or insects. If it has stood for 100 years, why would you consider it inadequate? Are you tasked at bringing it up to today's code?
If you are going to sister the rafters, you might as well add collar ties.

RE: Bringing up to new code with Collar ties

(OP)
This work is for a NonProfit Weekend & Summer Camp for children (HAs some church association, but I don't remember or care about that. I'm just doing it for the kids to have additional monies). My kids don't go the the camp, but I would still liek to help out. Total of four buildings getting panels plus ground array.

Their budget is very tight. I was thinking about just paying for the renovations and donating my services just to get it to be safe, but I am still wondering if I MUST specify the collar ties or not, or in what scenario I must bring teh structure to new code?

Thanks all.

RE: Bringing up to new code with Collar ties

Apexpredetor,

The collar ties are more to resist downward forces than uplift. I'm guessing there isn't too much snow in your area for the walls not to have been pushed out. Or, perhaps there is some type of attic and/or ceiling joists that attach to the rafters effectively serving the same function as collar ties?

I'm guessing also that the rafters are actually 2" x 6", or close to it, not the modern 1.5" x 5.5" and if so that helps your cause in terms of the adequacy of the rafters themselves.

As Excel pointed out, sometimes it's hard to make these old structures work on paper and yet this one's stood for 100 years. So is it really worth messing with? And I agree with him also in that if you do then adding collar ties would probably be worthwhile.

RE: Bringing up to new code with Collar ties

It looks like someone has to mess with it, as apparently the owner intends to add solar panels to the roof.

RE: Bringing up to new code with Collar ties

Oh, I missed that part of it. That's a bad idea, in my opinion, but, if it has to be done then a more in-depth analysis and possible retrofit might be in order.

RE: Bringing up to new code with Collar ties

(OP)
I was under the impression that the collar ties resist upward forces trying to open the roof like a clam shell, and rafter ties (lower on the rafter) ties the bottoms in to resist that outward thrust (wall movement). Maybe just a difference of phrasing here.

Structure has 2x6 ceiling joists, unfinished above.

If I analyze it for stress and deflection I am ok with stress, but being that they are only 2x6 I fail in deflection (L/180) by quite a bit.

Thanks for all of the opinions. I really want to help these guys out best I can.


RE: Bringing up to new code with Collar ties

Collar ties are generally for the clamshell affect. Rafter ties are for resisting outwards thrust.
Collar ties CAn be used in conjunction with rafters ties to reinforce a roof by using the collar ties in compression. They have to be designed not to buckle, however and there is additional outwards thrust generated on the rafter ties.

RE: Bringing up to new code with Collar ties

if you sister without collar ties, the original rafters are still going to take the majority of the load as they will be significantly stiffer than the rafters without collar ties.

a modeling program would obviously take this into account, but if you're doing hand calcs just keep that in mind-

RE: Bringing up to new code with Collar ties

Uplift on 100 year old houses? I would not be worried about the collar ties in that respect... But they act like a horizontal chord in a truss does in resisting the horizontal thrust in gravity loading situations. The lack of these has resulted in pushing walls out-of-plumb, but my experience with them has been that they usually work OK. Why? Residential roof dead load is pretty small, and roof live load is rarely applied unless the roof is being recovered.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources