×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

DNV 2.7-3 Pad eye Design

DNV 2.7-3 Pad eye Design

DNV 2.7-3 Pad eye Design

(OP)
Hi All,

DNV 2.7-3 provides guidance for padeye design (formulas) in Appendix A (Page 43). In any design the Rpad (radius of padeye) and Rpl (radius of plate) are same. Then why are these two being assumed differently?
When I put the value of Rpl to 60 mm (this is already designed/fixed value of padeye), the Rpad comes out to be 56.36 mm. What should be the final/correct value to be used?


Regards,

HD

RE: DNV 2.7-3 Pad eye Design

To check tearout you are not providing all the required parameters for us to calc R(pad):
thickness of plate
thickness of padeye including cheekplates
Rad of cheek plates
Dist of hole to edge

RE: DNV 2.7-3 Pad eye Design

Well that is convoluted way of checking shear stress by solving for an equivalent radius.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources