DNV 2.7-3 Pad eye Design
DNV 2.7-3 Pad eye Design
(OP)
Hi All,
DNV 2.7-3 provides guidance for padeye design (formulas) in Appendix A (Page 43). In any design the Rpad (radius of padeye) and Rpl (radius of plate) are same. Then why are these two being assumed differently?
When I put the value of Rpl to 60 mm (this is already designed/fixed value of padeye), the Rpad comes out to be 56.36 mm. What should be the final/correct value to be used?
Regards,
HD
DNV 2.7-3 provides guidance for padeye design (formulas) in Appendix A (Page 43). In any design the Rpad (radius of padeye) and Rpl (radius of plate) are same. Then why are these two being assumed differently?
When I put the value of Rpl to 60 mm (this is already designed/fixed value of padeye), the Rpad comes out to be 56.36 mm. What should be the final/correct value to be used?
Regards,
HD






RE: DNV 2.7-3 Pad eye Design
thickness of plate
thickness of padeye including cheekplates
Rad of cheek plates
Dist of hole to edge
RE: DNV 2.7-3 Pad eye Design
Attached is the padeye details. I am confused, why Rpl and Rpad are different? What should I take in the final design?
Regards,
HD
RE: DNV 2.7-3 Pad eye Design
RE: DNV 2.7-3 Pad eye Design