×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Compression helical spring

Compression helical spring

Compression helical spring

(OP)
Hi everyone!

I work with pressure vessels inspection and it includes pressure safety valves (PSV) calibration.
We have a new standard that recommend us to perform two tests on the springs that are part of those PSV. They are:
- Check if the spring axis is 90º +- 2º of the end plane;
- roll the spring over a plane surface and check if every coil is in contact with the surface for a complete tour, i.e. it must be a perfect cylinder.

The service is considered static. The spring is preloaded between 10% to 80% of the deflection range.

Those restrictions are promoting a rejection rate about 40% of the tested springs.

The question is: Are those tests too strict to this aplication?

Best Regards!!

Rafael Licursi

RE: Compression helical spring

Only the PSV manufacturer could know with any certainty just how crooked a spring their design can tolerate, so I'm hoping that your new inspection criteria came from them.

Be sure to inspect the new replacement springs to the same standard, and to be religious about rejecting the 'bad' ones. That may cause some readjustment of the standard.

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: Compression helical spring

Standard commercial tolerance is 90º +/- 3º asking for tighter tolerances require sorting and raise the cost. The requirements you subject the spring indicate a bad design of the valve. A good design of the valve should use means inside the valve that doesn't care for such requirements. For example transferring the spring force via a small steel ball which assures always an exact direction of the spring force with "almost" no matter how the perpendicularity deviate from 90º +/- 3º. The second requirement indicate that there is a concern that the spring will buckle sideways and rub on the housing walls thereby introducing friction. The good design should use a slightly tapered spring which avoids the buckle risk or use a shorter spring compared to the spring length.

RE: Compression helical spring

Sorry, it should be "shorter spring compared to the spring diameter".

RE: Compression helical spring

These checks seem more necessary for spring manufacturing, than Relief Valve certification.

I've never heard of a test like this done on PRV calibration and API-576 makes no reference to it.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources