×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Long culvert on no slope

Long culvert on no slope

Long culvert on no slope

(OP)
Reviewing a design:

2 BOX culvert with a length of 120' on 0 slope (identical upstream & downstream elevation).
To reach the rock bedding, they've put the BOX 3' under the stream elevation (embeddding).

Is it me or this will affect:

1) Capacity of te culvert (I have to see the calculations yet)
2) Frequency of maintenance (sedimentation issue)
3) ...

RE: Long culvert on no slope

Capacity would be effected because you are losing 3 vertical feet of cross-sectional area, you're always going to have sedimentation issues with a culvert, probably less with 3' of head always in the culvert.

RE: Long culvert on no slope

Is this a 3-sided or 4-sided box?

If 3-sided I would recommend cast in place footings and knee walls to keep the box at the higher elevation, unless it is designed for the loss of height. Also, the stream elevation may lower due to contraction scour which may help with this. On the other hand if scour becomes too large due to contraction and local abutment/pier scour, the rock will be exposed and an evaluation of whether the rock is erodible should be performed. In this case rock embedment of the footings may need to be considered.

If a 4-sided box just check to make sure the culvert was designed with the sedimenation issues in mind. You could also grade the channel to lower the elevation to the box bottom.

RE: Long culvert on no slope

Smiah - sounds like the design is keeping the natural bottom through the culvert; may for fish passage? The culvert may also be oversized from the start to accommodate the rougher bottom. I have seen and used this approach previously. As long as the designer/engineer accounts for scour/aggredation within the culvert and the analysis is correct, it should be fine.

RE: Long culvert on no slope

(OP)
Well... I have to see the calculations yet.

From my understanding, the 4-sided box isn't oversized and no analysis has been perform regarding scour/sedimentation issue.

Plus, from my own verifications, there's no rock 4' under the stream so...

RE: Long culvert on no slope

(OP)
I always try to design a culvert with at least a slope that can produce a velocity over 5 or 6 fps for a 2-year peak flow so it can be naturally washed out once in a while (I may be wrong here).

It's pretty hard to calculate a culvert with no slop (?!). You can do it but... you have to assume a minimum slope or a head differential from entrance to exit.

I'm trying to make my point about avoiding a 120' culvert on a flat slope. Option is to reprofilate the stream upstream (or downstream) to gain a little slope (say at least 0.1%).

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources