×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Synchronous Generator speed

Synchronous Generator speed

Synchronous Generator speed

(OP)
We have a hydro powerhouse with 750KW 40Hz generators with 40 poles. We cannot increase the rotor speed to produce 60Hz. power. We have been told that the stator can be rewound to produce 60Hz. It seems like this would need 1.5 stator windings per rotor pole. There is only one winding per slot, so the slots are fairly shallow. It would be much easier to restack the stator core than to modify the rotor.

Has anyone tried this? Any thoughts? A vendor has said it might be possible, but has offered no details.

RE: Synchronous Generator speed

Frequency is dependent on how often a rotor pole passes a given location on the stator; you can raise the frequency by rotating faster or by having more poles. Nothing you can do with the stator to change the frequency.

RE: Synchronous Generator speed

Why can't you increase the speed? A speed increase may be an easier problem to solve.
Changing the number and/or spacing of the stator poles without changing the number and/or spacing of the rotor poles may change the phase angle of some of the windings in a phase group and may not change the frequency.
Changing the number of rotor poles will change the frequency but with many coils generating at the wrong phase angle the terminal voltage at a given excitation current will be down.
Why can't you change the speed, The set is not that big and not running that fast.

Bill
--------------------
"Why not the best?"
Jimmy Carter

RE: Synchronous Generator speed

(OP)
The Francis wheel turbine chokes off water flow and will not rotate any faster than 140RPM, even at full gate no load, so speed cannot be increased. Rotor is cast iron, also cannot handle anything faster than that. No room for a gearbox (or its expense). We're familiar with re-poling the rotor, but due to its construction, we don't believe it will work on this unit.

RE: Synchronous Generator speed

Might be a case for a rectifier-inverter arrangement, basically a frequency converter, all solid-state and low maintenance. Depending on the voltage, you could almost re-purpose an off the shelf VFD for hardware.

old field guy

RE: Synchronous Generator speed

Thank you for the explanation bartb102.

Bill
--------------------
"Why not the best?"
Jimmy Carter

RE: Synchronous Generator speed

(OP)
The inverter is a good idea, but not economical for 750KW, 12KV, 40Hz input. Could put in a stepdown transformer, but not cheap for 40Hz.

RE: Synchronous Generator speed

There's always the rotary converter option, a four pole motor driving a six pole generator.

RE: Synchronous Generator speed

Hello bartb102

Maybe you could take a look wheel and mechnical design in order to study if you can redesign something that can help you increasing the mechanical speed like an alternative you could replace the actual generator by one with 54 poles and regulate.

I.M.O a comparisson between mechanical modification and generator replacement most done in order to have a technical- economic solution.

Regards

Carlos

RE: Synchronous Generator speed

That powerhouse was the subject of a thread in Eng-Tips some couple years ago.
It is an historic intallation, and has a web page. I will not reveal more, only the OP can do that.

The 6 40HZ generators are coupled to the 60Hz grid by two synchronous/synchronous frequency changer sets, or that was the arrangement. Perhaps the idea is to eliminate the frequency changers, or there is a fault in one of them??

A static frequency changer is possible of course and have been built for many different frequency combinations by amongst others, ABB, and Siemens. The 60/25 HZ
SFCs feeding Amtrak and SEPTA rail operations have been in service by now many years.
The Swedish Railways are fed by many SFCs working at 50/16.66 HZ.

It is an economic problem, likely, the cost of a HV SFC would far exceed the available funds for this relatively small plant.

rasevskii

RE: Synchronous Generator speed

Sorry. Protection required by the utility normally includes some sort of direction current limitation and either ROCOF (rate of change of frequency) or vector control. This prevents the alternator from adding to a utility fault or the utility supplying energy back into the alternator. The system is further complicated if the utility supplying has auto-reclosers on them. If the utility disconnect from the grid due to fault and then recloses automatically, the frequencies may have slipped out of step and this may result in pole slipping and destroy your machine. This is not good!

RE: Synchronous Generator speed

(OP)
rasevskii, you are correct. The two freq. changers are still in operation. We have restored six units to full output, and would like to restore the seventh. Problem is, the changers can handle only 3 units each. Thus our search for a better way to make the conversion. As always, economics will determine what happens.

RE: Synchronous Generator speed

I assume your rotor operates at 2 hz and you have 40 poles to produce 40 hz.
If you wanted to produce 60hz, you would need to rewind both your stator and rotor for 60 poles

Regarding the stator:
[quote]There is only one winding per slot[quote]
Do you mean one coil per slot? i.e. single layer winding?
How many stator slots does this machine have?
If it is a multiple of 60, that makes the job easier. If it is not an exact multiple of 60, it would be a fractional slot winding. We can look at options for fractional slot winding when we know the number of slots.
Someone would have to look at physical installation /coil design so the end portions of the coil have adequate clearance

=====================================
(2B)+(2B)' ?

RE: Synchronous Generator speed

Seems like that rewinding the rotor from 40 to 60 poles might be even more of a challenge than the stator

=====================================
(2B)+(2B)' ?

RE: Synchronous Generator speed

(OP)
There are 120 slots in the stator, 20 coils per phase. Single layer winding (makes it relatively easy to change coils when one fries.)

RE: Synchronous Generator speed

do you mean 40 coils per phase?

=====================================
(2B)+(2B)' ?

RE: Synchronous Generator speed

Sorry, I got it. Single layer winding, twice as many slots as coils.

=====================================
(2B)+(2B)' ?

RE: Synchronous Generator speed

(OP)
glassesglassesglassesIf we needed to double the frequency, I could envision trying to install two layers of stator windings (so each pole was over two coils, not just one). But I don't see a way to do it for a 50% increase.

Remove half the rotor poles & install three layers of stator winding? smile Now that would be fun to design and build.

By the way, at 60Hz. we want only 4160V, not 12KV.

RE: Synchronous Generator speed

You don't need a special build 40 Hz transformer. A 60 Hz transformer rated for 150% voltage will maintain the V:Hz ratio. Reading and talking to old timers when I was young indicates that the during the great change-over from 50 Hz to 60 Hz in Ontario Canada many transformers and motors were re-rated and continued in service. Changing from delta to wye may do the job on delta delta transformers.
Due to the increasedd voltage rating at the same current, the KVA rating must increase by 50% to 150%.

Bill
--------------------
"Why not the best?"
Jimmy Carter

RE: Synchronous Generator speed

Quote:

There are 120 slots in the stator
Let’s say we want to try to put a 80 pole stator into a 120 slot core.
2/3 slots per pole per phase.
If we attempt to develop a fractional slot winding, some pole phase groups have 1 slot allocated and some have zero allocated. Already we suspect that will result in a lot of harmonics, but we need to figure out the coil layout to balance the fundamental among phases first:
A reference here:
thread237-261447: Question for experienced rewinders

Quote (zlatkodo 21 Dec 09 3:46)

Here we are talking about the three-phase windings with fractional number of slots per phase and per pole , such as: q = 1⅓ or q = 2⅜ etc .
This fractional number we can write in this form: q = A + b/c
If q is an integer then the winding is always symmetrical. But if q is fractional number then symmetrical three-phase winding MUST meet two additional requirements:
1/ - Number of poles must be divisible with "c" and
2/ - Number "c" should not be divisible by 3 [electricpete’s note: or else the fundamental will be unbalanced among phases] .
You have q = 120/(3*60) = 2/3
A =0, b = 2, c = 3
With c=3, you cannot perfectly balance the fundamental in this configuration. You would have to leave some slots empty to do that. I’m sure there are quite a few more challenges even in designing the stator and balancing fundamental of stator among phases may be among the smaller ones. But in my view it is first step to find the winding configuration to balance the fundamental and second step to evaluate harmonic performance of that winding configuration. I am doubting this existing stator core can be rewound for 60 poles without substantial derating and lots of harmonics and vibrations. If your shop thinks they can do it, then I would ask them to tell me how they are going to lay out the coils (with that info we can evaluate the harmonics).

=====================================
(2B)+(2B)' ?

RE: Synchronous Generator speed

The c=3 means you cannot get a geometrically similar winding (three phases are carbon copies of each other, just shifted by 120 degrees). So you can't get a perfectly balanced fundamental. But considering the large number of poles, I think you can get veryclose. But still the harmonics would be a huge concern.

=====================================
(2B)+(2B)' ?

RE: Synchronous Generator speed

I'm still concerned with the rotor.
How about cutting the number of poles in half on both the rotor and stator. Then slow the turbine down to get 60 Hz. Any solution will involve compromise and I suspect a reduction in the KVA rating.
Consider any one coil. The number of rotor poles passing in one revolution will induce a 40 Hz EMF. Changing the number of poles on the stator may result in some interesting harmonics but it won't change the frequency.

Bill
--------------------
"Why not the best?"
Jimmy Carter

RE: Synchronous Generator speed

Quote (waross 12 Oct 13 22:55)

I'm still concerned with the rotor....Changing the number of poles on the stator may result in some interesting harmonics but it won't change the frequency.
Yes, we are in agreement.

Quote (electricpete 10 Oct 13 9:10)

If you wanted to produce 60hz, you would need to rewind both your stator and rotor for 60 poles


=====================================
(2B)+(2B)' ?

RE: Synchronous Generator speed

Quote (waross)

How about cutting the number of poles in half on both the rotor and stator. Then slow the turbine down to get 60 Hz.
You’ll have to explain your logic.
Cutting poles in half would give 20 poles.
To get 60hz with a 20 pole machine would require you to operate at speed of 360rpm.
That’s going in the wrong direction.
The machine is currently operating at 120rpm and can’t exceed 140rpm

=====================================
(2B)+(2B)' ?

RE: Synchronous Generator speed

I stand corrected. Sorry

Bill
--------------------
"Why not the best?"
Jimmy Carter

RE: Synchronous Generator speed

(OP)
Thanks for all the input, guys. The end result is that for 750KW, converting the generator to 60Hz. is not practical or cost effective compared to a inverter.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources