×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Recommended Hydraulic Modeling Method

Recommended Hydraulic Modeling Method

Recommended Hydraulic Modeling Method

(OP)
I am looking for recommendations from experienced users. For cross-pipe analysis of pipes which are not culverts that impact FEMA floodplains, and where HY-8 is invalid due to velocity limitations, would you recommend using HEC-RAS or using HDS-5 Nomographs? Why?

RE: Recommended Hydraulic Modeling Method

what's a "cross-pipe"

RE: Recommended Hydraulic Modeling Method

(OP)
The correct terminology in PA would be pipe culvert; a pipe conveying a stream or other surface runoff across a highway right-of-way, apart from the pavement drainage system. The analysis is to determine headwater elevation and flow velocities.

RE: Recommended Hydraulic Modeling Method

Still not following this question ... start with culvert master, solve for hw

RE: Recommended Hydraulic Modeling Method

What are the velocity limitations that preclude HY-8?

RE: Recommended Hydraulic Modeling Method

(OP)
@Twinkie: CulvertMaster is proprietary software, which is the reason I limited the choice of hydraulic calculation methods to HEC-RAS and HDS-5. If you still do not understand the question, please let me know what further information you need.

@BigInch: HDS-5 is the US FHWA methodology. By posting that link, are you sating that you recommend the HDS-5 method over using HEC-RAS for these pipe culverts? If so, why?

@TerryScan: According to one design manuals, HEC-RAS should be used instead of HY-8 when the stream velocity is greater than 5 ft/s. According to another design manual, HY-8 is invalid when entrance velocity is greater than 5 ft/s. Neither manual gives the reasoning behind this limitation.

RE: Recommended Hydraulic Modeling Method

The technical methods implemented in HY-8 are from HDS-5.

RE: Recommended Hydraulic Modeling Method

(OP)
@LincolnPE: Right, and knowing that relationship, would you assume that it is OK to utilize HDS-5 when HY-8 is not allowed?

RE: Recommended Hydraulic Modeling Method

you can use any method you want that is approved by the reviewing agency. you would need to ask the reviewer which methods are approved.

RE: Recommended Hydraulic Modeling Method

No, I wouldn't.

RE: Recommended Hydraulic Modeling Method

Ok, upon further reading, HDS-5 does discuss approach velocity. (It may not be sufficient for the conditions being discussed).

"HWo+Vu^2/2g=TW+Vd^2/2g+HL

HWo is the headwater depth above the outlet invert, m (ft)
Vu is the approach velocity, m/s (ft/s)
TW is the tailwater depth above the outlet invert, m (ft)
Vd is the downstream velocity, m/s (ft/s)
HL is the sum of all losses including entrance (He), friction (Hf), exit (Ho) and
other losses, (Hb), (Hj), etc., m (ft)
Note: the total available upstream energy (HW) includes the depth of the upstream water
surface above the outlet invert and the approach velocity head. In most instances, the approach
velocity is low, and the approach velocity head is neglected. However, it can be considered to
be a part of the available headwater and used to convey the flow through the culvert

Likewise, the velocity downstream of the culvert (Vd) is usually neglected."

HY-8 indeed does not account for approach velocity "Entrance limitations -Since HY-8 is not primarily a water surface profile computation program but is a culvert analysis tool, it assumes a pooled condition at the entrance to the culvert."

My experience has been entirely in a coastal plain where I have never encountered significant approach velocity. I alway appreciate getting an education.

RE: Recommended Hydraulic Modeling Method

JZ -

If your culvert is in outlet control, or is in inlet control with high head, then the approach velocity is going to be effectively zero anyway due to ponding at the headwall. The only time you'd have a significant approach velocity is in cases where the inlet headwall isn't flooded, and those honestly aren't very common with event storms.

I would at a minimum try HY-8 and see what the results are, and if you have your inlet flooded I'd use that as a case with the reviewer that the assumptions within HY-8 (which are the same as HDS-5) are valid.

Hydrology, Drainage Analysis, Flood Studies, and Complex Stormwater Litigation for Atlanta and the South East - http://www.campbellcivil.com

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources