×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Dielectric Fittings and Galvanic Corrosion

Dielectric Fittings and Galvanic Corrosion

Dielectric Fittings and Galvanic Corrosion

(OP)
It is common practice to install a dielectric fitting when you have to connect a copper pipe to a steel pipe in building systems design, especially at water heaters, boilers, and sprinkler systems.

A common fitting used for smaller pipe connections where flange fittings are not appropriate is dielectric waterway by Victaulic (http://static.victaulic.com/assets/uploads/literat...) which appears to be a carbon steel outer portion and a thermoplastic lining. Other fittings use a similar construction.

My question is how well this would actually work. It doesn't appear the galvanic circuit has been broken. While the distance from the dissimilar materials is increased on the interior of the pipe, the metal outer shell would still conduct the current of the galvanic circuit. Maybe the resistance of the outer shell is enough to minimize the current flow to levels where corrosion is minimal.

Any opinions or thoughts would be appreciated.

RE: Dielectric Fittings and Galvanic Corrosion

I'm anxious to hear others explain how this could work well. It seems to be depending on the water not being particularly conductive, because those painted Victaulic hubs aren't going to offer much resistance on the exterior after tightening. It would seem to me that all these devices would do is move the corrosion location, reducing the rate a bit by reducing but not eliminating the current flow.

RE: Dielectric Fittings and Galvanic Corrosion

You are correct moltenmetal, it depends on the water having low conductivity. Neither the waterway nor traditional dielectric fittings are very good for long.

RE: Dielectric Fittings and Galvanic Corrosion

(OP)
The water would be domestic tap water which flows and fire sprinkler water which remains fairly stagnant except for required flow tests and of course a fire event. TDS is normally limited to less than 500, but hardness, alkalinity, etc. can vary.

RE: Dielectric Fittings and Galvanic Corrosion

I agree with the comments above. All metallic parts parts of a plumbing system should be grounded and therefore they are electrically connected. The important fact to bear in mind is that current flow through an electrolyte is by movements of ions. This requires a threshold voltage to be exceeded. The ion flow is greatly reduced by making the path longer and will also be affected by fluid flow. If the dissimilar metal pipes are truly electrically insulated from each other, then the unions would work according to theory. But in most real world piping that does not seem possible. In that case the unions probably slow down corrosion. However, it may also happen that the corrosion occurs in a thinner area of pipe or fitting than without the union.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources