×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Placement of Mass Concrete to Control Thermal Cracking

Placement of Mass Concrete to Control Thermal Cracking

Placement of Mass Concrete to Control Thermal Cracking

(OP)
When placing concrete for a large mass concrete gravity retaining wall - what is the best placement method for control of thermal cracking?

I typically deal with smaller reinforced slabs which I know benefit from a sequential bay construction rather than an alternate bay construction / "hit-and-miss" because I know that pouring an infill slab means that external restraint can be very high. However, in this case it is likely that internal restraint (as the volume of the pours is likely to be large) will be a key issue. Is is therefore better to follow a sequential pour method (to minimise external restraint) or an alternate bay method to allow formwork to be left on as long as possible for insulation purposes (to minimise internal restraint).

I can't find information on what is the traditionally accepted methodology for concrete placement in this scenario and there are differing opinions in my office. The Contractor would prefer sequential pours as he would like to use formwork on rails which he will push along for each subsequent pour.

I have also heard that there can be issues regarding bond between pours and that sometimes a diagonal pour is recommended to increase the surface area between pours. Refer to diagram:

http://s16.postimg.org/6gb6g4sad/Thermal_Cracking_...

Any input would be very much appreciated...thanks!

RE: Placement of Mass Concrete to Control Thermal Cracking

There's no simple answer. In a mass placement thermal cracking is a function of several aria less, including mix design,ambient air temperature, placement size, flyash, etc; but you probably know that already. The thing with mass concrete is to keep the core concrete temperature and the surface temperature of the concrete within 40 degrees F of each other, but staying below 160 degrees. It is tricky but not impossible; been done plenty of times.

There is free software available at www.texasconcreteworks.com to perform the analysis. Also, look at ACI 207.

I don't like the diagonal placement because of acute corners. There's nothing wrong with a construction joint. You just need to size it properly and make sure you call for a water stop and proper surface prep before placing subsequent placement. I would go with staggering the placements.


RE: Placement of Mass Concrete to Control Thermal Cracking

Bridge buster is right on. Various methods can be used to keep differencial temperatures below 40-degrees and upper temperature below 160-degrees. Some ideas:

-Lower the starting temperature of the concrete and you lower the upper limit. If you are pouring in the summer adding ice can help.
-Cover the slabs with cure blankets, regardless if it is cold outside, will insulate and keep differencial temperatures down.
-Cooling tubes can be used to recirculate cold water in the footing
-Install temperature monitoring, or maturity meters than can be monitored. This allows you to react to anything out of the ordinary.

It is usually good practice to make a couple of test pours to see how your specific mix is going to kick off.

RE: Placement of Mass Concrete to Control Thermal Cracking

Have you considered using fly ash substitution for the cement content? We used 50% fly ash and 50% cement on a mass concrete job - placed at 27 to 29 degC and max temperature in 900 mm thick lifts (sometimes containing 1500 m3 of concrete) was only to 43 degC.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources