×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Fan and Pump Curves vs. Affinity Laws

Fan and Pump Curves vs. Affinity Laws

Fan and Pump Curves vs. Affinity Laws

(OP)
I have always wondered why fan curves don't appear to be consistent with the affinity laws that we are taught. For example. We are taught that:

P2/P1 = (RPM2/RPM1)^2 = (CFM2/CFM1)^2

This would mean that fan curves should be perfect quadratic squares and all look like parabolas. However, we know this is not the case. They are often very flat at low CFM or even have a dip.

For example: http://www.fumetech.com.au/images/300perfcurve.gif

or

http://www.viconequip.com/Content/Governair%20Mult...

or

http://www.greenheck.com/images/articles/rpm_curve...

Does this mean the affinity laws are not correct or are an approximation? What is the explanation for the discrepancy between the curves and the laws? Do the laws not apply under certain conditions? Does this have to do with laminar/turbulent flow?

Thanks!

RE: Fan and Pump Curves vs. Affinity Laws

Cant say I am familiar with Affinity laws.... must be something new in engineering ciriculae or were called something totally different back in the day , but I suspect the answer is related to the fact that a fan runs at anywhere from about 10% efficiency upto around 82% effiociency at different spots on the curve.

RE: Fan and Pump Curves vs. Affinity Laws

Are you confusing the SYSTEM curve with the published fan/pump curve provided by the mfgr? The affinity laws describe the SYSTEM curve, which when placed on the published fan/pump curve determines where you device will operate. Once set you can use them to determine head at different flow, impeller diameter or speed etc.... at different conditions...





RE: Fan and Pump Curves vs. Affinity Laws

miningman, Affinity laws, probably older than Adam :)

It is a capital mistake to theorise before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts. (Sherlock Holmes - A Scandal in Bohemia.)

RE: Fan and Pump Curves vs. Affinity Laws

The affinity laws are an estimation rather than an absolution. If you cut speed by half, airflow should be about half. I haven't had much luck with the cubic power part of the estimation though. A cubed deduction in power would be great if I go to half speed, but reality usually shows lesser results. There are different results for different fan curves/types, e.g., backwards inclined vs. forward, plug fans vs. centrifugals with shrouds, etc.

RE: Fan and Pump Curves vs. Affinity Laws

I will say, after many years of Engineering and testing, that the affinity laws are pretty good approximations.

RE: Fan and Pump Curves vs. Affinity Laws

Agreed, good approximation that becomes less accurate the more you reduce diameter or speed when applied to centrifugal pumps - can't speak for fans.

It is a capital mistake to theorise before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts. (Sherlock Holmes - A Scandal in Bohemia.)

RE: Fan and Pump Curves vs. Affinity Laws

Most literature that I see alludes to the decreasing accuracy of the application of affinity laws that occurs when the range of operation between two states is increased.

RE: Fan and Pump Curves vs. Affinity Laws

I agree with 11241 comment and it sounds like you're mixing the curves up.

The page has some good images on it you may find helpful. There are many other great webpages and books available as well though. That was just my first hit.

http://www.greenheck.com/library/articles/10



RE: Fan and Pump Curves vs. Affinity Laws

ChaseBean1: Curious to see if the minimum control head or static pressure was affecting your estimations of energy savings? Say for a pump at 1,000 gpm & 100 feet w/ a min control head of 20 feet, the variable flow head would be 80 feet. This would shift your system curve up 20 feet at O flow and impact your actual savings. I figure you know this just had to bring up as it puzzled me until I plotted it out one time.



RE: Fan and Pump Curves vs. Affinity Laws

11241, who said anything about estimations? My prior post was about what I'd really seen rather than calculated - I'm not sure about your question...

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources