×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

AISC Torsional Bracing of Beams (Appendix 6)

AISC Torsional Bracing of Beams (Appendix 6)

AISC Torsional Bracing of Beams (Appendix 6)

(OP)
Has anyone noticed that Equation (A-6-9) in AISC 360-05 Appendix 6 gives a significantly greater required bracing moment (Mbr) than the equation from which it is derived? Equation (A-6-9) is based on Equation (15) from "Fundamentals of Beam Bracing" by Joseph Yura, 2001, first quarter, AISC Engineering Journal. The equations are provided below. These equations pertain to nodal torsional bracing for a wide-flange beam or girder. The Appendix 6 Commentary derives Equation (A-6-9) but it isn't clear to me why it would return a required bracing moment that is 3-5 times (in my case) that required by the equation from which it is derived. My guess is the simplification incorprated into the derivation essentially makes Equation (A-6-9) an upper bound for the required moment.

AISC Equation (A-6-9): Mbr = 0.024(Mr)L/[n(Cb)Lb]
Yura Equation (15): Mbr = 0.005LLbMr2/[nhEIyC2bb]

For what it is worth, the Guide to Stability Design Criteria for Metal Structures (6th edition) shows the same equation as Yura.

The required bracing moments are not large in either event (for my case) and I am going to follow the code requirement, of course (the AISC equation).

RE: AISC Torsional Bracing of Beams (Appendix 6)

Yes, equation A-6-9 is a conservative simplification of the Yura equation (C-A-6-8). I don't get as involved in Appendix 6 as I get in the other analysis / stability provisions. So, I'm not expert. However, I do know that the AISC task committee responsible for this appendix has been exploring the possibility of two things for the next code cycle:

1) Swapping the two equations for the next code cycle. Meaning the more exact Yura equation would be in the appendix and the approximation would be in the commentary.

2) Leaving it as it currently exists but adding additional commentary about the extra conservatism inherent in the simplified equation.

Based on a draft version of the next spec given out at the last committee meeting, it appears that they are going with option #2.

If I had to guess, I'd say that the extra conservativeness stems from the fact that Mr/ho is assumed to equal the flange force Pf... which is assumed to be at its buckling load.... rather than the maximum flange force seen by the member.

RE: AISC Torsional Bracing of Beams (Appendix 6)

(OP)
Thank you for the insight and I agree with your assumption regarding the conservativeness of the 'simplified' equation. Incorporating Option #1 into the next Specification makes more sense to me but adding clarifying language in the Commentary certainly will help. Thanks again.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources