×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Double datum letters

Double datum letters

Double datum letters

(OP)
The ASME standard certainly allows double letters to be used as datum feature identifiers, once the single-alpha identifiers have been exhausted (ref. para. 3.3.2). But here's an interesting question:
Since the single-letter designation doesn't have to follow alphabetical order, would you say that the double-letter designation also doesn't have to follow an order? The standard seems to imply that the double letters must, but that seems like a break in logic from the single letters.

In other words, if I have a huge drawing where I need 60 datum features (hey, it's possible), would you say it's illegal to use BX, for example, without having an AA, AB, AC, etc.?

John-Paul Belanger
Certified Sr. GD&T Professional
Geometric Learning Systems

RE: Double datum letters

The standard (Para. 3.3.2) says: “When datum features… are so numerous as to exhaust the single alpha series, the double alpha series (AA through AZ, BA through BZ, etc.) shall be used…”

Nowhere the standard says that “you shall start with AA”.

I personally met people who believed that AZ should be followed by AAA, so actually explaining that “double alpha” means that AZ is followed by BA was absolutely necessary IMHO.

RE: Double datum letters

I do not believe any order is required. Too many people belive "A" must be the first datum!
Frank

RE: Double datum letters

But I think you still have to exhaust your single alpha option before you can start using AA (or ZZ for that matter)

RE: Double datum letters

Taken literally it can be read to imply more than that!
Frank

RE: Double datum letters

(OP)
Well, here's how I see it, if you want to approach it from a "legalistic" point of view: Double letters can be used, but only if the 23 single letters have all already been used. Then, if you do get into double letters, they don't have to start with AA (although that is implied as the logical way to start) but they can be random double letters, if desired.
I'm thinking we all can agree with that (but I'm curious what your last post was alluding to, Frank).

John-Paul Belanger
Certified Sr. GD&T Professional
Geometric Learning Systems

RE: Double datum letters

JP,
Just that the order given as an example was, literally, required. There is a section in the standard that says something about "datum order is not required", that is what I go by.
Frank

RE: Double datum letters

I think standard meant just because the datum is alphabetically first, it doesn’t make it primary.

On the side note, some companies (and possibly countries thru national standards) require using unique letters on datums, views and sections.
This means two things:
A. “single alpha” will be exhausted even faster.
B. skipping letters and burning alphabet from both ends should be tolerated.

RE: Double datum letters

(OP)
Good points, CH. I was just using ASME thinking.

However, I would say that not only is the letter irrelevant to the precedence of primary, secondary, tertiary, but that the letter itself could be plucked from anywhere in the alphabet.

I heard of one guy who always used his initials for the datums. Thus, no A, B, C, on the drawing anywhere. But the lone datum feature was labeled as D because his name was Daniel.
"Hey, Dan," people would say, "you can't do that."

"Yes I can," countered Dan, "see, it says here in the standard...!"

Needless to say, although he was right, he was kind of annoying :)

John-Paul Belanger
Certified Sr. GD&T Professional
Geometric Learning Systems

RE: Double datum letters

Mistakes are made, changes happen, we don't want to have to reletter everything each time we change datums frameworks, at least I don't.
Frank

RE: Double datum letters

I feel that it is still a good idea to initially use leters consecutively, especially if you know that double letters may be required. This makes it much simpler to avoid repeating letters unintentionally.

“Know the rules well, so you can break them effectively.”
-Dalai Lama XIV

RE: Double datum letters

(OP)
One other question for the group -- it's still about datums so I will tack it on here instead of starting a new thread...

Is the "note" on page 48 of the 2009 standard (at the end of paragraph 4.2) intended to be worded that way? I guess I understand the gist of it, but what is the deal with the first few words, "In the means this portion..."

I'm not an English major, but that seems like a typo or something.

John-Paul Belanger
Certified Sr. GD&T Professional
Geometric Learning Systems

RE: Double datum letters

Mean average?

“Know the rules well, so you can break them effectively.”
-Dalai Lama XIV

RE: Double datum letters

As confused as you are spineyes

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources