×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Pole shed diaphragm?
2

Pole shed diaphragm?

Pole shed diaphragm?

(OP)
I have a 60'x150' pole shed project (19' to underside of truss) where the client does not want to provide an OSB or plywood diaphragm.

The system the client wants is pre-eng trusses at 4' o.c. (To match the poles) with 2x6 strapping at 24" o.c. and metal sheeting. This construction method is to apply to both the walls and the roof. The metal sheeting is NOT steel deck but more of a VicWest style architectural sheeting.

Has anyone here designed 2x6 strapping (or strapping in general) as a form of diaphragm?

We've determined that the sheeting may provide some form of diaphragm however we think that the weak link in the system will be the strapping, specifically the connection of the strapping to the trusses/poles.

Does anyone have any experience with this?

RE: Pole shed diaphragm?

Is the owner attempting to patent a new type of pole building that flies? He is kidding himself here, miserably, for a structure that size. I would back run away from this one, and quickly, as he wants to be the engineer.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering

RE: Pole shed diaphragm?

(OP)
Haha, That was my first thought. Unfortunately it wasn't my decision whether to accept the job or not, we have the contract to design the building.

From the first minute I looked at it I knew it needed some sort of proper diaphragm, We can get away with no wall sheathing by using bracing but the roof needs something otherwise the columns would need to be considered cantilevers. Which then they fail miserably in slenderness.

Anyone besides Mike have another opinion? (Not a knock of Mike's opinion as I tend to agree with him)

RE: Pole shed diaphragm?

PEMB's have the X-Bracing in the roof structure, so, in all eventuality, it could be used here for wind against the 60' wide face, but for the longer face, with no shear walls, what would be the point as the lateral load still has to go to the poles?

However, with 19 foot eaves I think the forces will be too great to attain the economy of structure he is probably looking for, even with the poles at 4'.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering

RE: Pole shed diaphragm?

(OP)
That's basically what I was thinking.

We don't mind the load going into the poles but we are more looking to be able to have the poles as fixed at the bottom and pinned at the top. For that I believe we need a diaphragm so the load can share across multiple poles.

RE: Pole shed diaphragm?

If you solid block between the poles along the long side, they should equally share the end wall load just fine.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering

RE: Pole shed diaphragm?

(OP)
Here's the pushback we're getting that I always love.

"We've been doing them this way for years! We're not putting sheathing on this thing."

They have jobs from years ago, with seals I might add, that have no sheathing and the columns are not overly sized. So either the previous engineers (yes plural) had a way of looking at the strapping as a pseudo-diaphragm or we're doing something wrong. Some of the older buildings that have been done were under the Farm Building Code (We're in Canada) which allowed for less stringent designs, however they removed that code from use and now these building fall under the National Building Code.

So can anyone think of a way that strapping could provide some sort of diaphragm action?

RE: Pole shed diaphragm?

can you come up with some sort of Vierendeel truss with the strapping. I cant think of any other way to get it to work.

RE: Pole shed diaphragm?

I think there are some pole building design guides out there. Each cantilevered pole might need to take its share.

I will try to dig up the reference. We looked at a couple of existing buildings recently, no (reliable) diaphragm, no strapping. Just buried / cantilevered poles.

RE: Pole shed diaphragm?

(OP)
I've got the reference from Sliderule's website. Still need to take a closer look at it.

We've done some of these before but they were never this large. Mainly 12-15 feet tall and reasonable plan dimensions.

RE: Pole shed diaphragm?

I have looked at this two times. Neither ever came to an answer that worked. Basically my approach has been to look at a plywood diaphragm as a moment connection for each sheet of plywood. So you would have the moment connections at 8' oc one way and 4' oc the other. Comparing this to a situation with trusses at 4' oc with 2x6 flat at 2' oc, the moment connection would be 4' oc one way and 2' oc the other. In both of the cases I looked at I could not get a simple moment connection to work and the client did not like the connections I was coming up with.
This way was also causing a cross moment being transfer by the trusses. So I had to state a minimum size and grade for the top chord and that the wind condition needed to be checked at a 1.25 (you may need a higher or lower factor for your case) factor inplace of the code 1.6 factor to allow the truss top chord to transfer this moment.
But as I stated I never finalized my calculation on these. So I could not say if the final numbers would give an answer I could seal. They were also for much smaller structures.

Garth Dreger PE - AZ Phoenix area
As EOR's we should take the responsibility to design our structures to support the components we allow in our design per that industry standards.

RE: Pole shed diaphragm?

(OP)
In discussions in the office I also said that if we came up with moment connections for the strapping we could consider it. But as you found the contractor does not want to do anything special, he figures a couple of nails will suffice, which it will not if we are hoping to use the strapping for lateral.

And I didn't think the truss mfr would appreciate the loads we would be requiring them to resist.

RE: Pole shed diaphragm?

I have not weighed in on this as I think I misunderstood some of the terminology. You mention 2x6 strapping, is this a system of roof purlins and wall girts? This is actually fairly common. The roof and wall sheeting will have diaphragm and shear wall capacity. You just have to be very specific on the fasteners. On the side walls, you will need some form of strut that connects the roof and the walls. On the end walls, the end truss can act as this member.

Your issue is going to be finding the allowable capacity of the sheeting. It is not easy to get, but can be calculated. There is published literature available from the National Frame Builders Association.

RE: Pole shed diaphragm?

(OP)
The sheeting that is being spec'd is 29Ga (yes 29) architectural siding. So it's basically paper and has zero capacity.

the 2x6 strapping could be considered purlins and girts I guess. but it would be bending in the weak axis as the 2x6's are on flat.

It is generally just applied to give the siding something to be mounted to but we were looking into the probability of using it for some form of lateral load transfer/sharing.

If people think a sketch will help I can post one however it is basically a built-up wood column with a standard roof truss sitting on top. There is 2x6's on flat mounted horizontally on the wall between the columns at 24" o/c and on the roof perpendicular to the roof joists at 24" on centre. Nothing special.

RE: Pole shed diaphragm?

Jayrod12, the system that you describe is used thousands of times a year. The 29 ga. material has much more capacity than you are giving it credit for. I know this, because several years ago, I was in your same situation. I have read the research and looked at the test results. Dr. James Leflar of the Colorado State University has done significant work on this. One of his published works is "A Mathematical Model of Steel-Clad Wood Frame Shear Diaphragms".

I have seen allowable capacities with 29 ga that go upwards of 300 plf. As stated earlier, this requires very specific nail / screw patterns and sizes.

RE: Pole shed diaphragm?

I typically use 100 plf for 29ga as I don't trust that it will get fastened correctly.

RE: Pole shed diaphragm?

I do not rely on it at all, ever.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering

RE: Pole shed diaphragm?

@Mike;

Unfortunately, if I don't rely on it, I can't rely on any builders ever using me again :>
There is plenty evidence in our neck of the woods that it is pretty darn effective as a diaphragm.

RE: Pole shed diaphragm?

@ ExcelEngineering:

Professionally speaking, I would not rely on it because at the first crinkle from contractors walking on it wrong, there goes any possible limited diaphragm action. To me, the stuff is just like aluminum foil.

As a side not, if this is the only work you have, you need to branch out in the market. Don't take me wrong here, but from your last comment, you appear to possibly be compromising your professional judgment to get work, and that is dangerous, very dangerous. If clients do not have enough money to do a job right, they will be the first to seek remediation from others, you in particular, when it fails. Be careful. Personally, I have been there and have had to walk away. The professional liability is just not worth it to me.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering

RE: Pole shed diaphragm?

Thanks Mike.
I am pretty well diversified and walk away from plenty of jobs.
I don't feel that I am compromising my judgement. The 29 ga is not that bad. I always specify a screw pattern that is well in excess of that required for my limit of 100 plf. We just do not see these things failing very often here. I only do about one of these every couple of years and they are pretty small in height and footprint.
Also, how is a small crinkle going to affect the overall diaphragm strength? -we are talking shear, not standing on a beer can.

If it makes you feel any better, I do not do ANY work on mobile homes.

RE: Pole shed diaphragm?

Long ago...I too had the task of looking at Pole Farm buildings such as hay sheds etc. And found myself saying what the 'F' are you guys doing?!? That doesn't work.
The city slicker headed into the country.
Of course that lead on a trail to the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, ASAE. Now Ag Engineers are different than Structural/Civil Engineers. A whole breed unto themselves.
Search them out you'll find papers on such subjects as;
Diaphragm Design of Metal Clad, Post Frame Rectangular Buildings ASAE EP484.1...this is actually a standard.
Characterizing Diaphragm Shear Stiffness for Diaphragm-Frame Interaction Amalysis ASAE Vol 32(5).
Pole Barn Wind Resistance Design Using Diaphragm Action ASAE Paper No: 75-4035
Strength and Stiffnes of Screwed Roof Panels for Pole Barns ASAE 1983.
Strength and Stiffness of Metal Clad wood freamed diaphragms CSAE...a Canadian equiv.
An Experimental Investigation of Diaphragm Behaviour of Farm Buildings ASAE 84-4511
Evaluation of Wood Frame and Metal Cladding in Roof Diaphragms ASAE 40(2).
Well there's a lot more like the above, but also,
Improving Resistance of Poles to Lateral Loads, ASAE Transactions 1981.
Design of Pole Foundations for Lateral Loads, Transactions of the ASAE 1981.
Performance of Pole Anchorages Under Gravity and Withdrawal Loads Transactions of the ASAE 1966.

All worth reading. But you would be best to head to the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, all the papers I have are old. Like me.
No doubt there is a lot of newer and more valuable updated stuff.
Good luck.

RE: Pole shed diaphragm?

(OP)
Thanks for all your comments so far. Something that we are looking at right now is modeling the frame in RISA (consisting of the two posts and the wood truss) as fixed on the bottom with a spring (representing the 29ga diaphragm) at the underside of truss. We are doing this because the 100plf of allowable shear resistance (the average of the numbers in the NFBA Post-Frame building manual for 29 Ga steel siding) is not enough to account for to take 100% of the lateral load as a diaphragm. However we believe it may be too conservative to ignore completely.

The spring stiffness would be adjusted (by iteration) to the point where the reaction at the top of the columns (The spring reaction) maxes out the shear capacity of the sheet metal. Our analysis goes as follows, the reaction at the springs would then be applied to the entire eave as a UDL. Then, the reaction on the end walls would be divided by the width of the building to determine if the linear shear exceeds the allowable load of 100 plf. Does this sound reasonable like a reasonable approach?

We think that this may be the most realistic way of looking at this as the sheet metal obviously provides some resistance and therefore acts as a semi-pinned support(maybe?). We also think that if the building starts to sway the purlins/girts (strapping) will provide some lateral resistance (perhaps not a quantitative amount but some none the less).

Further I have a couple other questions:

OHIOMatt/Everyone
What is the fastener and fastening pattern to achieve the 300 plf previously stated (roof cladding to strapping, strapping to truss)?

Everyone Else
How does the American code look at slenderness in this case (noted above)? In our initial runs in Risa we did not encounter any slenderness errors; we had expected to run into issues in this regard. In the Canadian wood code column slenderness cannot exceed 50. Assuming a fixed-free connection conditions (k=2) the slenderness ratio for a 4-2x8 going 19' works out to 63. Assuming a partially restrained-in-rotation top connection (k=1.5) and a fixed bottom connection the slenderness ratio is 47 and therefore it appears we can get a reasonably sized column to work.

Any of your thoughts and suggestions are much appreciated.

RE: Pole shed diaphragm?

Spaced at 4 feet instead of the 8 to 12 normal, an effective 6X8 column arrangement could work at a higher stress grade, possibly with knee braces, and considering the higher allowable lateral drift/deflection ratios allowed for pole buildings.

Sorry, but I will never rely on the 29 gage material at the roof.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering

RE: Pole shed diaphragm?

jayrod12 - Sometimes brute force methods are not unreasonable. Have you considered driving treated timber piling? Then you have your cantilevered "poles" projecting 19' above ground.

1. The building is fairly large, the one-time cost of pile driver mobilization can be "absorbed" more easily than on a smaller structure.

2. Installation of the "poles" will be quick which will hold down labor costs when compared to a more sophisticated design.

3. You should be able to accommodated the clients "special" requirements.

Perhaps pile driving is not common in your area... in which case please ignore. Where I am, driven piling would really be a potentially viable solution (both technically and financially).

www.SlideRuleEra.net idea
www.VacuumTubeEra.net r2d2

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources