×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Truss Plate Stress vs Member stress

Truss Plate Stress vs Member stress

Truss Plate Stress vs Member stress

(OP)
Just got done analyzing a metal plate connected truss. By the grade of lumber used (S-P-F 1650f 1.5E) the member combined stresses are very low (around .3-.4) with my assumed loads (around 60psf total). I don't have a good way to analyze the metal plates. Ideas? I can't imagine they would engineer the TC a 2x6 (2x4 BC) and make the plates so very weak as to be weaker as the 0.4 CSI??

RE: Truss Plate Stress vs Member stress

I would contact the engineers at Mitek or Alpine for plate analysis questions. They have been pretty accessible to me in the past.

RE: Truss Plate Stress vs Member stress

(OP)
Do you more experienced members have any tricks on how to determine who manufactured trusses you might be trying to analyze?

Most I see barely have grade stamps on them.

RE: Truss Plate Stress vs Member stress

Alpine and Mitek will recognize photographs of their own plates. If the plates are older they might be from a defunct company and then you are SOL. Actually even in those cases the engineer's at Alpine and Mitek might be helpful to a point. Some of those guys have been around a long time and may have even worked for some of the other companies.

You are facing a common and old problem as you will see if you do a search on eng-tips. Proprietary truss plates are a problem and I have not seen a clear solution. Mostly it comes down to making some assumptions about the performance of the plates...basically ignoring them for the purposes of member force determinations. This is not always conservative however, since the plates induce moment in the members. Also indeterminate 3-point bearing, cantilever, and vaulted/scissor trusses are highly sensitive to truss stiffness and not being able to model the plates appropriately only adds to the sensitivity.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources