×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

taking primary vs secondary and primary consolidation when calculating settlement

taking primary vs secondary and primary consolidation when calculating settlement

taking primary vs secondary and primary consolidation when calculating settlement

(OP)
Hello

For civil pe preparation, On 6 minute solutions for geotech book, problem 42. why does it say it is normally consolidated and take only primary consolidation into account and not secondary consolidation as well?

it is basically a question that has sand and below the sand there is clay. you excavate some of the sand and refill and apply surcharge. it asks for the clay settlement underneath.

Thanks

RE: taking primary vs secondary and primary consolidation when calculating settlement

I don't have the book - but typically one doesn't really consider, unless the project necessitates it, secondary settlements as they are a long time coming and are quite small compared to consolidation settlements (peats and organic clays, etc, notwithstanding). One aspect, and this may be a bit more involved than the question, is that very few soils are "normally consolidated" since, if they are not recent (and still undergoing consolidation settlement by self weight), aging has an effect of providing a bit of preconsolidation to a clay so using normal consolidation only would be a bit to more conservative.

RE: taking primary vs secondary and primary consolidation when calculating settlement

(OP)
Hello and thanks a lot for answer. I didnt understand the part you said :

"very few soils are "normally consolidated" since, if they are not recent (and still undergoing consolidation settlement by self weight), aging has an effect of providing a bit of preconsolidation to a clay so using normal consolidation only would be a bit to more conservative."

could you explain here a little more?

RE: taking primary vs secondary and primary consolidation when calculating settlement

If I understand BigH's point correctly he's basically saying that "normally consolidated" is a conservative approximation as most soils, unless they are freshly placed, are pre-consolidated and therefore stronger than their normally consolidated counterparts.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources