INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Jobs

Non Structural Components

Non Structural Components

(OP)
Hello,
I am querying about an interpretation of ASCE 7-2002 as referenced by the NYC code. In 9.6.1 the exceptions indicate components with Ip of 1 are exempt from the provisions of the section for a Category C building. Later it says that one should address these items when failure could affect an essential component - perhaps from another trade. While that makes sense to do, I am curious how the code is really interpreted. Is a non-essential item to be restrained whenever an essential item is below it? The essential component may have been installed long after access to the non-essential component is available. Thanks.

RE: Non Structural Components

I believe your interpretation is correct. When failure of a non-essential component may damage an essential or structurally important part of the structure, the attachment for a non-essential component must be designed adequately per the code requirement. An example may be, if a non-essential architectural component fails and damages an essential force resisting beam or component of the structure, then the attachments for those architectural components must be designed adequately.

RE: Non Structural Components

(OP)
Thanks for that. To clarify, you are saying the exemption may not apply?

In this case the issue is non-essential HVAC ductwork already installed followed later by the electrical contractor locating an essential conduit (not sure what, perhaps exit lighting) to cross below the duct. Access may not permit after the fact conventional restraint of the duct, so it seems the contractor installing the the essential element should take care to protect it from unbraced items above it. In no case are we talking about structural integrity of the building. Does your comment apply in this case? Thanks.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close