×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Pile Working Load

Pile Working Load

Pile Working Load

(OP)
There are many formulea on pile capacity and one becomes uncertain which one to use.

The site is characterised by 4 m of granular random fill overlying the native sand and gravel (till-like) materials. If I drive an open steel pipe pile (12" OD), how much wouldthe nominal working load be? Thank you.

RE: Pile Working Load

are you serious?

Kieran

RE: Pile Working Load

(OP)
By serious, does it mean that it is such a simple question asked? (maybe I am missing some obvious matters)
(Assuming SPT = 33 for the soil under the fill and that the pile could reach to refusal after penetrating 4 m into the bearing gravel strata, using the lower and upper limit constants the working load ranged from about 350 to 850 kN. Meantime a contractor's rough prediction is 90 kN).

The available formulations yielded diverse results. I have not done any post installation performance monitoring of open steel pipes driven into sand and gravel but for some other types, to be able to rate the suitability of a specific formulation. I know that the actual working load is only determined by PLT, however, would like to see if the comments by experienced engineer could help.

(Assuming SPT = 33 for the soil under the fill and that the pile could reach to refusal after penetrating 4 m into the bearing gravel strata, using the lower and upper limit constants the working load ranged from about 350 to 850 kN. Meantime a contractor's rough prediction is 90 kN - a little wide range).

RE: Pile Working Load

Personally I wouldn't use an non-displacement open-ended pile in granular soils - but would use a displacement pile such as a closed ended steel pipe pile - or better yet a Franki expanded base pile.

One of the biggest problems when considering the "geotechnical design" for allowable bearing pressure in granular soils is the choice of Nq. Depending on the method chosen (Meyerhoff, Vesic, Berezantev, De Beer, etc), for your "N=33" which implies a friction angle of say 36deg, Nq can range from 70 (Vesic) to 300 (Meyerhoff driven). This is a dilemma for sure - many have determined that Berezantev is the most "reliable" and hence Nq ~ 100. The working load would be the safe load based on shear and permissible settlement. With a closed-ended steel tube pipe pile driven with a suitable hammer and to a suitable set (I would typically use the Gates formula modified by Flaate), you should be able to reach 100 tons (US) as a working load - but you need to determine if this is reasonable for your case. Tapered piles would typically have a greater working load (see Nordlund). I know of one very experienced geotechnical engineer in Vancouver (passed away many years ago) who basically said - I don't know what the "formulas" tell me but its good for 200! (US tons). In your case, the "random" fill would be expected to offer little frictional capacity and you might also have to consider any downdrag forces that might result over time.

Your investigation should have revealed if there are any "soft" layers within short distances of the pile tip - this could lead to reductions in load.

Anyway - these are my quick thoughts on the issue.

RE: Pile Working Load

(OP)
BigH: Could you please explain how the N=33 was related to friction angle of 36? Thought it would have been 40-46.

RE: Pile Working Load

Just went to a chart that appears in many texts (Peck Hanson and Thornburn for example - with props). Is it an "absolute"; no, but then, again, with all the other inaccuracies, it is good for preliminary check. I would never use 40-46 degrees for a friction value in design . . . One point, too, to be made is that if your N value is in gravel, it might actually be overstating your value due to the gravel sizes.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources