×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

FHWA Specs - Special Provisions (SP) or Special Contract Requirements (SCR)

FHWA Specs - Special Provisions (SP) or Special Contract Requirements (SCR)

FHWA Specs - Special Provisions (SP) or Special Contract Requirements (SCR)

(OP)
I have been tasked to lead the design of two small accessory buildings for a county highway project using FHWA (FP-09) specifications. It is NOT a DOT/FHWA project, just the project design scope states that our specification master will be the FP.

We paged and labeled the specs for these buildings as "SP" pages. We received two conflicting comments from the reviewers...one stated that we needed to separate the specs into divisions (the 000XX series), while the other stated we need to just change the labeling and call these SCR provisions.

Our in-office spec writer insists that DOT projects usually utilize SP provisions for technical/material specs in construction contracts (which this is) as instructions to the contractor, and SCR's are usually (not always) reserved for administrative or regulatory provisions.

None of the DOT literature seems to provide a firm and final on this subject.

Anyone have experience with this issue or can direct us to a good reference to clarify?

Thanks.

RE: FHWA Specs - Special Provisions (SP) or Special Contract Requirements (SCR)

I manage a Heavy Highway Contractor/Materials company and I checked with our Contract Administrator, and his main concern if you have the two different labeling of specs is which one would take precedence and that would have to be written in the specifications.
Also, he would look to make sure the SCR or SP do not conflict with each other or conflict with the plans or specs.
We usually do not concern our selves with the labeling, just the order of precedence as this is what you would legally have to abide by.

RE: FHWA Specs - Special Provisions (SP) or Special Contract Requirements (SCR)

why wouldnt you just resolve this with the reviewers?

RE: FHWA Specs - Special Provisions (SP) or Special Contract Requirements (SCR)

A particular specification is amended or replaced with a special provision to resolve project-specific issues. The decision to amend or replace any standard specification with a special provision is made during the design process and is based upon the sound engineering judgment of the project designer.

Special Contract Requirements generally cover contract requirements like joint powers agreements, real estate related agreements, and contracts that require unique or special contract terms like disadvantaged business issues, etc. Specifications should not be in the special contract requirements.

I do not believe that accessory buildings are included or covered in the Standard Specifications, at least not the ones that I work with. There is a standard specification for roads, but not for buildings.

It is not good practice to specify an accessory building with the special provisions, but I have seen firms do it on small projects. The risk is that something will be left out of the specification or missed. I have also seen firms put the division specifications into the special provisions. Again, for small projects.

If your project is small, you can probably get away with it. However as noted by DDBPE above, you will need to list in your Contract document what specifications are included, the order of precedence, and make sure that you do not miss something.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources