×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Geotechnical Resistance - from Allowable to Factored ULS Resistance

Geotechnical Resistance - from Allowable to Factored ULS Resistance

Geotechnical Resistance - from Allowable to Factored ULS Resistance

(OP)
In all the geotechnical reports (in Canada) now Factored ULS (Ultimate Limit State) Resistances are given instead of traditional Allowable Resistance. When using factored ULS you find the capacity is lower than before.

For example, I have two geotech reports done by the same geotechnical consultant for the same site. One is done in 2004 with allowable values, another is done this year without new BH just changed the values to be factored ULS. As saying the new report is giving a bit higher capacity based on the piling records - this is what the client is expected. However the new "capacity" is not increased at all.

In the old report, the allowable steel pile shaft skin friction resistance is 16kPa, while in the new report the factored ULS resistance is 18kPa. However the factored load for the 18kPa increased more. The design loads to compare to these values are:

In allowable resistance design: Specified Load vs Allowable Resistance
In limit states design: Factored Load vs Factored ULS values

The Factored ULS value is about the same as the Allowable Resistance since it is 0.4 x ULS values (as per NBC). But the Factored Load is much higher (say 25% higher at least) than the specified load. This causes the lower design capacity.

This is what I experienced for a while. Thanks for your input.

j1d

ps. anothr question is that SLS values are given in some geo reports. If we consider the pile resistance (come with certain settlement, say 1/4") is actually a Serviceability Limit State issue then the design geotechnical resistance will be higher.

RE: Geotechnical Resistance - from Allowable to Factored ULS Resistance

Get your geotech guy to give you a better resistance factor for ULS by doing proper testing.

Depending on the quality of the drilling, sampling and testing we sometimes are approved to use a factor of 0.55. That being said he gives us an unfactored ULS value of ~30 kPa when using 0.4 and an SLS value of ~15 kPa.

RE: Geotechnical Resistance - from Allowable to Factored ULS Resistance

I'm not familiar with the Canadian approach but I'd agree that you would talkto your geotech designer. If I'm understanding correctly and you have to have to use 0.4 uls, that's basically like the geotech applying a factor of safety of 2.5 to the ultimate capacity. Since that's about the same as applied in traditional design (with unfactored structural load) it inherently makes sense that you'd end up with a lower working capacity using a methodolgy that compares this against factored structural loads. Also, traditionally, the factor of safety is only applied to shear failure behavior, not settlement. So I wouldn't expect a uls capacity to change from traditional based on settlement criteria....again talk to your geotech.

RE: Geotechnical Resistance - from Allowable to Factored ULS Resistance

. . . and all these factored values come from correlating to the old method . . . makes sense, eh?

RE: Geotechnical Resistance - from Allowable to Factored ULS Resistance

(OP)
Thanks.

I understand it is in a transitional period using limit states design in evaluating geotechnical capacities. But it should a smooth process to correlate to the traditional allowable capacities. What we encountered now, in many cases, is the real geotechnical design capacity is lower for the soil at the same spot. That means when you review an existing strucuture designed a few years ago using the new values you find the pile capacities are not enough. But the strucutre's been standing there for years without any issues.

I think the factors, either that for geotechnical resistance or for strucutral loading, should be adusted to make smooth change.

BTW, many old geotech reports used settlement (say 1/4") as well as the criteria determining the allowable resistances.

Thanks,
j1d

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources