Pump Controls
Pump Controls
(OP)
The Sequence of Operation of the chilled water system pumps (depicted in the attached sketch) is that when there is demand for cooling, the Primary Pump comes on. Upon proof of flow from the flow switch, the chiller associated with this primary pump comes into operation. If the cooling demand is not met with one chiller, the second Primary pump and its chiller comes into operation and likewise upon further increase of cooling load, the third primary pump and its chiller comes into service.
Likewise when one primary pumps is automatically switched off based on returning chilled water temperature, the flow in the system reduces to 400 GPM from 600 GPM. The fan coil units that are still in service will now see less than design flow. If two primary pumps are switched off based on returning chilled water temperature, the flow in the system reduces to 200 GPM and the fan coil units that are still in service will get much less flow than design flow for their capacity.
The Secondary Pumps are continuous duty constant speed pumps.
This scheme of things therefore appears flawed. This system would be fine for the 2 way valves, but not for the 3 way bypass valves. So the proposal is that instead of removing the primary pumps from service, let all the primary pumps stay in duty regardless of demand and just switch the chillers on or off to match the load. Is this acceptable?
Likewise when one primary pumps is automatically switched off based on returning chilled water temperature, the flow in the system reduces to 400 GPM from 600 GPM. The fan coil units that are still in service will now see less than design flow. If two primary pumps are switched off based on returning chilled water temperature, the flow in the system reduces to 200 GPM and the fan coil units that are still in service will get much less flow than design flow for their capacity.
The Secondary Pumps are continuous duty constant speed pumps.
This scheme of things therefore appears flawed. This system would be fine for the 2 way valves, but not for the 3 way bypass valves. So the proposal is that instead of removing the primary pumps from service, let all the primary pumps stay in duty regardless of demand and just switch the chillers on or off to match the load. Is this acceptable?





RE: Pump Controls
I'm not clear on how the 2-way, or 3-way valves affect the problem, but my expertise is not cooling.
Runing all the primary pumps all the time sounds like the most expensive option you could think of.
Independent events are seldomly independent.
RE: Pump Controls
Yes the Secondary Pumps are neither VFD nor do they switch off!
If the fan coil units were equipped with 2 way valves, upon meeting of the cooling demand, these two way valves would close and thus stop the chilled water from entering the coil. The GPM needed would therefore reduce and there would be no problem if the Primary Pumps cum chiller could be stopped by sensing either the return water temperature or by the pressure switch that would sense the 2 way valves of many fan coil units have closed causing the increase in pressure.
The remaining in duty Primary Pumps could continue to handle the GPM requirements of the fan coil units whose 2 way valves were still open.
In the case of 3 way valves, this would not be possible, because the pressure of the system would not rise significantly due to the bypassing of chilled water from the coils of fan coil units. Furthermore, the secondary pumps are not VFD so they will continue to run even when the demand is very little. So if the Primary pumps are switched off based on return water temperature, the other pumps would continue pumping water to all the fan coils (both in which the water is being bypassed by the diverting 3 way valve and those in which the cooling demand has not been met). So the GPM that the remaining (on duty) primary pumps will churn out will be shared by the off duty fan coil units bypass leg as well as the fan coil units in which the thermostat has not diverted the flow due to the cooling demand not having been met. But the GPM that will be seen by these On Duty FCUs will be less than needed for cooling because of the needless sharing by the off duty FCUs. So the only way of circumventing this scenario might be to keep all primary pumps running and only switching off the chillers depending on return water temperature.
Your feedback will be appreciated.
RE: Pump Controls
Another consideration is as follows:
Since the secondary pumps are constant duty pumps, their cancellation and replacement with an untrimmed pump impeller (to give a higher head) is being contemplated. However, there is another reservation. The actual GPM being handled by each secondary pump is 300 GPM instead of the 200 GPM shown in the sketch. This 300 GPM each means 900 GPM for all three secondary pumps whereas the total GPM of all three primary pumps combined is 600 GPM. Is this 300 GPM due to diversity factor in which the Primary pumps are sized for diversity whereas the secondary pumps are sized for the maximum possible demand?.
RE: Pump Controls
Independent events are seldomly independent.
RE: Pump Controls
RE: Pump Controls
The secondary pumps, if none shut off, would see their capacity at 600 gpm (presumably 200 gpm each), 66% of capacity at 400 gpm, and 33% capacity at 200 gpm. 33% might not be very efficient for those pumps, but so be it for now. Unless you cut off one fan coil circuit completely, then the next etc., your stuck with that mode of operation.
It is not clear what type of cooling must be maintained. Must it be cooling in all units continuously, or if the demand is unit by unit, ie. you can shut off one fan coil, then the other and the last. Is the system for room cooling where some cooling must be maintained on a warm day, or is it for freezer cooling, where one unit can be emptied of its contents and turned off, for example, then the next, etc. What you need to do there might have a significant effect on what measures you should take to do it.
This system seems basically to be designed for one and only one flowrate with room temperatures being maintained by turning on, or off, 1 or 2 chillers. It also doesn't seem that you could do much about it, other than adding a control valve downstream of the discharge of the primary pumps (or make them all VFD driven) to save some energy there, and perhaps making a similar installation on the secondary pumps, if you still wanted to squeeze more efficiency out of them too. What is the object of this exercise?
Independent events are seldomly independent.
RE: Pump Controls
As I see it you have a couple of alternatives - raise the pressure in the system by increasing head from the primary pump such that the pressure at the far building is always > 75 psig and then introduce pressure control valves to limit each building to 75 psig and run the primary pumps continuosly and just turn the chillers off if not required.
Alternatively you could replace your three way valves with isolation valves (two way valves) and do the same as above to get rid of the secondary pumps, but turn off the primary pumps if flow rate falls ( flow meter required) or return temperature falls.
You really need to have the main control either at the coils or the primary pumps, not both. The chillers should control by maintaining the outlet temperature from the chillers.
One point though - your description at the start "the chiller associated with this primary pump " implies that each primary pump is directly connected in line with a chiller, wheras your diagram indicates that the outlet of the pumps is commoned up BEFORE the inlet to the chillers, not after which is implied by your description. Which is correct?. To achieve a constant flow, does flow bypass or go through each chiller regardless but is not being chilled? There is a discrepancy here which is also causing conflict in the control system design.
My motto: Learn something new every day
Also: There's usually a good reason why everyone does it that way
RE: Pump Controls
Independent events are seldomly independent.
RE: Pump Controls
Meanwhile, Thanks again.
RE: Pump Controls
My motto: Learn something new every day
Also: There's usually a good reason why everyone does it that way
RE: Pump Controls
The schematics that was attached with the thread was to depict the system in a very general way. From the depth of analyses received from the Forum, I am convinced that the schematics must be revamped to reflect the installation with more detail and more accuracy and actual numbers. So please bear with me for the next little while till the Autocad specialist can churn out another sketch perhaps within a day or 2.
RE: Pump Controls
Independent events are seldomly independent.
RE: Pump Controls
1. The primary pumps rated for 200 GPM are probably downsized taking into account the diversity factor, and this might explain the flow of 280 GPM in the secondary pumps. However, the system might malfunction because secondary pumps are not VFD and therefore unable to give flows lesser than 280 GPM.
2. Due to the absence of the Hydraulic Decoupler, the system can hardly be called Primary-Secondary Pump System. The so called secondary pumps are barely boosting the pressure to take care of the pressure drop in the building they serve. (Would there be any advantage to retrofit a hydraulic decoupler given that the pumps are constant speed, and what would be its location.?).
3. Each chiller has 2 circuits, in fact two small chillers are packaged as one.
4. The primary pumps are not dedicated for a particular chiller. Any pump can come on to cater a chiller that cuts into service.
5. The Secondary pumps are NOT VFD and they are continuous duty. In other words there appears to be no advantage of providing these secondary pumps.
6. The bypass line shown on the chillers seems redundant, as it is equipped with a normally closed manually operated butterfly valve. If it is converted to a motorized valve that opened when a chiller cut out of service, the system would at least become a constant volume system, thereby not starving any fan coil units of design GPM. However, another simpler method would be to just let the water run through all the chillers regardless of whether they are ON or OFF.
7. Advice about how to retrofit the system to make it functional and energy efficient would be appreciated.
RE: Pump Controls
Independent events are seldomly independent.
RE: Pump Controls
Nice diagram, but doesn't really add much to the info you've already given I'm afraid and I'm not actually sure what your problem is any more. Does the system work, but perform badly?, Does it work at all? or are you just trying to figure out how it will work?
~anyway my comments to your points
1) There is a discrepancy between the primary and secondary pumps, but just because a pump says it's duty is 280, doesn't mean it will do that for a centrifugal pump. It could do anything from 75 to 350+ gpm depending on the head it sees.
2) What is a hydraulic de-coupler?. In my opinion you are better off raising the primary head to over 75 psig at the furthest building and introducing pressure controllers to each building and doing away with the secondary pumps as it is difficult to control and spec them properly, especially for a fixed speed unit
3)Ok - I assume the balancing valve is a manualy adjustable control valve aimed at eqaulising flow between the two chillers?
4)OK
5)The secondary pumps are there to maintain pressure in each building, but this is a poor way of doing it and looks a little to me like a fix to a problem which the original deisgner or operator found
6)I think you need to let the water flow through the chillers regardless of operating or not so that you can balance the system
7)To me you have a disconnect between the design of the buildings fan coil units which appears to use / be designed for a constant flow and constant pressure of chilled water and then bypasses units when cooling is not required and a primary flow system which varies flow depending on return water temperature and may then starve a building of chilled water which it needs. Therefore I think you need to remove the secondary pumps, upgrade the primary pumps in terms of head and fit pressure regualting valves at each building inlet so that each buildign gets the same water supply. Run the sytem continuosly at 600 gpm and flow through all the chillers, just turning them on as return temperature rises. You should be able to rotate the chillers so that they get an equal amount of run time.
Maybe not the most efficient, but the alternative is to change the fan coil units to isolation valves instead of bypass and then control water flow by turning on pumps or using a VFD to maintain a set pressure in the discharge leg of the primary pumps and again get rid of the secondary units by increasing the size of the primary pumps and using pressure controllers to regulate flow between the buildings evenly. This would leave the chiller controls as is, but means a lot of work to change all the bypass valves and revise your control logic.
I think you've got too much installed equipment which is ion conflict with each other to make it the most efficent system, but it will work a lot better....
My motto: Learn something new every day
Also: There's usually a good reason why everyone does it that way
RE: Pump Controls
Thanks to both of your gentlemen.
Best Regards
flexiblycool
RE: Pump Controls
Did it help? Are you going to change anything?
We all like a bit of feedback about our comments...
My motto: Learn something new every day
Also: There's usually a good reason why everyone does it that way
RE: Pump Controls
I found your feedback (and of THE other respected members of the Forum) most meaningful to help chalk the strategy which is as follows:
The secondary pumps are acting only as boosters and the terminology Secondary Pumps is superficial.
If the head of the Primary Pumps is sufficient 'as is', the Secondary Pumps can be removed immediately for a cost saving from the O&M point of view. In fact is the head of the primary pumps turns out to be sufficient, the money of the secondary pumps should in all fairness be refunded to the Owner. The pump head calculations must have been incorrect and these were not reviewed carefully by any party. The only justification that might be put forward in favor of secondary pumps might be that they will take care of increased system resistance due to clogged FCU strainers. This argument might not be tenable because routine FCU maintenance should take care of such contingencies and not the secondary pumps.
The Primary Pumps must never be shut down. This seems to be very rigorous for the primary pumps but fortunately there is a fourth pump that is used as standby so that could relieve one pump at a time.
The water must be allowed to circuit through the idle chiller to keep it a constant volume system.
The alternative recommendation would be to make it a true primary-secondary(vfd) system with 2 way valves on the FCUs.
Question: The proper location on the hydraulic decoupler with reference to the new sketch will be appreciated.
Thanks & Best Regards
RE: Pump Controls
Therefore you need to create two loops either at the far end connecting the far building supply line to the return line or doing it at the start of the circuit. The way yours was drawn up was a straight through system with the "secondary" pumps acting like a booster pump.
Sometimes also seems to be a called a neutral bridge.
http://hpac.com/air-conditioning/improving-efficie...
My motto: Learn something new every day
Also: There's usually a good reason why everyone does it that way
RE: Pump Controls
Your retrofit solution will indeed require considerable money and expertise!
I wonder what would happen in the existing scenario in which only 600 GPM is available and the secondary pumps are battling to pump 840 GPM in the buildings. Could this cause secondary pump cavitations? No unusual sounds or vibrations have been observed however, and the secondary pumps appear to be plugging on fairly smoothly.
RE: Pump Controls
RE: Pump Controls
If you want a VFD solution, try monitoring suction pressure and adjusting the 2nd pump speeds to keep them constantly above NPSHR, yet always maintaining discharge pressure below whatever is required for max flow while keeping >NPSHR at the primaries. Try combining that first with simple on/off control of 2 of the primaries, leaving one running constantly to keep minimum flow going to the chillers).
Independent events are seldomly independent.
RE: Pump Controls
I am trying to arrange an Ultrasonic Flowmeter for the readings. So will get back to the forum ASAP with the data and findings.
RE: Pump Controls
I still don't understand if you have a problem you're tryiing to fix and what that problem is or are you trying to commision this mess??
My motto: Learn something new every day
Also: There's usually a good reason why everyone does it that way
RE: Pump Controls
Pumps don't pump what "they" want, unless they are running on a test bench. Pumps don't just pump at BEP or rated flowrate and they don't even try to get there. There is a system curve that between the pump curve and the system curve, decides how much goes round and round. Pumps operate with whatever corresponding flow shows up at their suction flange.
Independent events are seldomly independent.
RE: Pump Controls
We still have to get back to you with the field measurements of pressures to see if the secondary pumps could be removed from the system without even having to upgrade the primary pumps because there seems to be a 25% factor of safety built into the primary pump head calculations! Maybe the field measurements will unravel or cause more mysteries.
So please bear with us. Thanks.
RE: Pump Controls
Independent events are seldomly independent.
RE: Pump Controls
One thing your system didn't show was your pressurisation system to keep the closed loop at a set pressure. Do you have one?
My motto: Learn something new every day
Also: There's usually a good reason why everyone does it that way
RE: Pump Controls
With close monitoring from you, a lot of progress has been made in unraveling the system and discovering some incorrect assumptions and mistakes (such as different flows of primary and secondary pumps).
Yes we have a expansion/pressure tank to maintain system pressure.
Getting the pressure readings will take another couple of days (or a few days at most), so your follow up at that time will be appreciated. We want to see the pressure at the entrance of the building, so the pressure gauges have to be arranged and installed, not only at secondary pump suction and discharge but also at the incoming headers to measure pressures with and without the secondary pumps working.
Thanks
Flexiblycool
RE: Pump Controls
The system described in the previous schematic sketches was simplified hypothetical model in which some buildings and equipment were deleted to fit everything on an A4 sheet. Since the discussion has evolved into a very technical one, I have reinstated the components of the system that I previously thought could be omitted.
In any case please refer to the new sketch which together with the last schematic describes the system more closely.
The flow readings could not be taken, but I think, the pressure readings are of substance. In any case the primary pumps are 700 GPM each. The combined GPM of all four primary pumps is 2800 that is divided equally in all the 3 branches.
The pressure readings of building no. 6 are anomalous but we cannot pin down the reason.
The pressure 5 meters upstream of the secondary pump of building 6 is 60 psi and that of building 5 is 57 psi.
Thanks in advance for your anticipated feedback about whether the secondary pumps can be deleted.
RE: Pump Controls
Independent events are seldomly independent.
RE: Pump Controls
This is a bit of a different scenario, but the same advice applies. Your pressure anomoly I can't understand, but in both instance the booster pumps appear to be adding about 15 psi. If the system is running at a third of the load as branch 1 and 2 are shut off, my advice is limited to say try it, but somewhere that extra pressure drop needs to be accomadated. You may need to run two main pumps to maintain flow, but would need to bypass the secondary booster pumps, not just flow through them.
Is the schematic correct in terms of the actual flow path? i.e. does the return line run FROM bldg 1 past all the others before coming back to the main pumps as you show in the diagram or does it in reality run from blg 6 in the other direction??
Without a full set of data (pump curves, elvations of buildings, lengts and sizes of pipes, location of valves, pressure drops and flow rates accross fan units etc etc) it is difficult to do much more.
Hope this helps.
LI
My motto: Learn something new every day
Also: There's usually a good reason why everyone does it that way
RE: Pump Controls
Hello LittleInch: Yes your feedback was of great help. Thanks a lot. The Autocad operator was not available to draw the sketch with all the buildings. I did this lash up job on the Xcel!, that's why the return line loop is not running side by side to the supply.
Today, I collected more data with 1 pump running only and water going only in the branch with the largest pressure drop, and also have data with 2 pumps running with 2 branches active. The pressure readings are a bit doubtful. Even the new pressure gauges are giving conflicting readings!
I have probably tired out those who followed and responded to this thread and have certainly become exhausted myself. It is not easy to get the readings on site.
Instead of speculative work, we are calling for water balancing of the entire system. If the water flows from each FCU at its design GPM without the secondary pump, we will advise the removal of these pumps.
I hope to be able to get back to the Forum with any observations of interest when we reach that point within a month or so.
Thanks to all the members of the Forum and particularly to BigInch & LittleInch.
RE: Pump Controls
LI
My motto: Learn something new every day
Also: There's usually a good reason why everyone does it that way
RE: Pump Controls
By the way, the Main Contractor probably knew very well what it will take to water balance the system (which I modeled for simplification as consisting of 60 FCUs, actually has over 400 fan coil units and about 30 AHUs). So guess what, the shrewd Contractor has contracted the work to a SUB CONTRACTOR!!!!!!!!!!!!
Maybe will meet you in another thread on this Forum.
RE: Pump Controls
http://www.eng-tips.com/threadminder.cfm?pid=1529
Use translation assistance for Engineers forum
Note the rules include No Student posting
RE: Pump Controls
Sorry I did not understand your message. Please elaborate
RE: Pump Controls
http://www.eng-tips.com/threadminder.cfm?pid=1529
Use translation assistance for Engineers forum
Note the rules include No Student posting