Steel Special Moment Frame with hinged one end
Steel Special Moment Frame with hinged one end
(OP)
I am designing seismic force resisting frames and have a question about steel special moment frame. If only one end of moment frame beam utilizes a pre-qualified connection per AISC 358 but the other end uses simple beam connection (pinned connection), Is it possible to treat this system as a special moment frame (R=8)? If not, why? For example, the bay between column line 1 and 2 or column line 3 and 4 on the attached sketch.






RE: Steel Special Moment Frame with hinged one end
The main challenge, in my opinion, would be that you will have to understand the code intent much better. It's not enough to follow examples because some of the canned formulas in the AISC 358 design procedures won't exactly apply. The concepts will be the same, but the configuration will be different enough that you need to thoroughly understand each step.
RE: Steel Special Moment Frame with hinged one end
Analysis and Design of arbitrary cross sections
Reinforcement design to all major codes
Moment Curvature analysis
http://www.engissol.com/cross-section-analysis-des...
RE: Steel Special Moment Frame with hinged one end
Some programs (like RISA-3D) will perform the basic AISC 358 calculations for you. But, my belief is that these programs will be built on the assumption that any beam in a SMF will be moment connected at both ends. Certainly, this is a case where you should not trust the program calculations without doing a detailed hand calculation to determine if the results are in the right ball park.
Disclaimer:
I work for RISA, so I can't really speak to what the ETABs and RAMs of the world do. But, I tested out a frame like this in RISA and the program will refuse to do AISC 358 calculations on the Fixed-Pinned beam. The column which supports it on the moment connection side looks like it gets designed nicely.... Though, it looks like the beam shears the program assumes for that connection are based on an assumption of a hinge at both ends of the beam. My belief is that this would always be a conservative error. Even so, you'd want to follow through the calculation by hand to make sure this doesn't cause other issues down the line.