×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Steel Special Moment Frame with hinged one end

Steel Special Moment Frame with hinged one end

Steel Special Moment Frame with hinged one end

(OP)
I am designing seismic force resisting frames and have a question about steel special moment frame. If only one end of moment frame beam utilizes a pre-qualified connection per AISC 358 but the other end uses simple beam connection (pinned connection), Is it possible to treat this system as a special moment frame (R=8)? If not, why? For example, the bay between column line 1 and 2 or column line 3 and 4 on the attached sketch.

RE: Steel Special Moment Frame with hinged one end

No one else responding? Well, my take is that you can do it. Now, I haven't reviewed AISC 341/358 to look for specific provisions that might exclude it. But, off the top of my head, I cannot think of any.

The main challenge, in my opinion, would be that you will have to understand the code intent much better. It's not enough to follow examples because some of the canned formulas in the AISC 358 design procedures won't exactly apply. The concepts will be the same, but the configuration will be different enough that you need to thoroughly understand each step.

RE: Steel Special Moment Frame with hinged one end

The AISC 358 calculations are largely done with hand calculations. Especially for the strange case scenarios like this.

Some programs (like RISA-3D) will perform the basic AISC 358 calculations for you. But, my belief is that these programs will be built on the assumption that any beam in a SMF will be moment connected at both ends. Certainly, this is a case where you should not trust the program calculations without doing a detailed hand calculation to determine if the results are in the right ball park.

Disclaimer:
I work for RISA, so I can't really speak to what the ETABs and RAMs of the world do. But, I tested out a frame like this in RISA and the program will refuse to do AISC 358 calculations on the Fixed-Pinned beam. The column which supports it on the moment connection side looks like it gets designed nicely.... Though, it looks like the beam shears the program assumes for that connection are based on an assumption of a hinge at both ends of the beam. My belief is that this would always be a conservative error. Even so, you'd want to follow through the calculation by hand to make sure this doesn't cause other issues down the line.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources