×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

316 vs 302 stainless springs and spring life

316 vs 302 stainless springs and spring life

316 vs 302 stainless springs and spring life

(OP)
Im using small springs approx .188 x .025wire x 1". I have the choice of 302 or 316 stainless. I believe that 316 has slightly better corrosion resistance, but what about temperature? In an operating temperature of 300-350F, which grade is better about retaining its memory and force? Will 302 have better fatigue resistance and retain its force longer than 316? Will they produce very similar results, or will one material be more likely to take a set? The spring will be constantly changing, but never go past recommended deflection. The spring will not be in any corrosive fluids.

In the end, Im sure I will do testing, but I wanted to see if anyone had any input on the subject.

thanks

RE: 316 vs 302 stainless springs and spring life

Are they manufactured to the same tensile strength?
If so, then I would go with 316

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Plymouth Tube

RE: 316 vs 302 stainless springs and spring life

If they are not subject to a corrosive medium, I would go with 302 and the sizable cost savings it offers.

RE: 316 vs 302 stainless springs and spring life

(OP)
Hey guys. The specs call out the same spring rate. Suprisingly, the costs are similar. THe springs are internal and will not see any corrosive fluid, gas or any downhole treats.

Link
Link

RE: 316 vs 302 stainless springs and spring life

Spring rate is dependent on geometry and elastic modulus, so it should be the same between the two springs. You must be purchasing small quantities where the material cost is not a dominant factor in part cost. Both alloys should behave similarly for your stated environment.

RE: 316 vs 302 stainless springs and spring life

But fatigue life is a function of strength (OK, stress).

I never liked working with 302 when I was drawing wire.
It just seemed that we got more consistent/uniform results out of 316.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Plymouth Tube

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources