×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Acceptable conrod cap deformation

Acceptable conrod cap deformation

Acceptable conrod cap deformation

(OP)
Hi all,
Does anyone know what would be acceptable conrod cap deformation. The big end details are 57mm ID, 30mm wide, 7500 rpm, max force on the cap 35kN. Thanks! Derek

RE: Acceptable conrod cap deformation

do you mean permanent deformation, or dynamic deformation while running? If the former, I'm inclined to say "zero."


RE: Acceptable conrod cap deformation

(OP)
Sorry I wasn't clear-- elastic deformation at TDC due to the tensile load in the rod.

RE: Acceptable conrod cap deformation

then it's a harder question to answer. The conrod big end bearing is notoriously picky about deformation and many times even careful analysis doesn't predict future problems. There are some "rule of thumb" guidelines for picking L/D for the bearing (unfortunately I can't remember at the moment what they are) and then the best advice I know is to make the big end as rigid as possible. That must of course be weighed against the effects on engine inertia and internal clearances to the block.

In other words, if I gave you a number you should disregard it.

RE: Acceptable conrod cap deformation

I don't know about rods, but Ford did do something like that for rockers back in the sixties. They designed a rocker that was very light but would surely fail, ran it on a dyno cycle until it broke, made the next one a little stronger at the fracture, and repeated until they couldn't break it on the dyno anymore. I think that was for a '429 Cammer'. There are advantages to making your own tooling.

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: Acceptable conrod cap deformation


Here is a link to a Mahle presentation about con rod optimization.
http://www.mahle.com/C125708F0068F67A/vwContentByU...

It seems to say 1 or 2 thou of big end distortion is OK, depending upon direction.
But the rod was optimized with this in mind.
• Ideal for Range Extender/Hybrid Applications Ideal for Range
Extender/HybridApplications
• Light Weight Engine Applications

Sounds like engines limited to 3600 rpm or so, and unlikely to ever be allowed under the care, custody, and control of a child,
or someone who acts like a child once in a while.

RE: Acceptable conrod cap deformation

(OP)
Thanks, My gut feeling was around 1 thou as the recommended big end bearing clearance is 1.8-2.5 thou.
My FEA gave 10 times this which was a shock so I've either done it wrong or I need to beef up the cap a bit smile

RE: Acceptable conrod cap deformation

Yeah, that doesn't sound good. I'm guessing that if you even double the bearing clearance dynamically, you will have bearing life problems. It would probably be a good idea to recalc the hydrodynamics with the extra clearance.

... or social- engineer your way into Federal-Mogul and ask a real expert.

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: Acceptable conrod cap deformation

I can't answer. But I believe that the designers of race bearing inserts could help you- since they build-in appropriate amount of eccentricity to race inserts, to prevent the clearance from going to zero at the rod's parting line. I haven't seen eccentricities available of much more than about .001" (per side); so apparently "expected" rod/cap deformation is in that same ballpark.

RE: Acceptable conrod cap deformation

(OP)
Thanks Mike and Jack,
It sounds like 1 thou would be ok. I'm still hoping that someone who works in this area will pitch in. cheers, Derek

RE: Acceptable conrod cap deformation

Hi Nchanga,

How are you modeling the interface between crank journal and bearing insert?

I think to some extent the rod, especially the cap, will conform to the shape of the journal when highly loaded.

here's some almost useless info about the contours built into rod bearing inserts other than one purpose is to reduce problems when the bore distorts. Sounds like Within 3/8" of the parting line their may be LOTS of extra clearance, which might be helpful in starting the hydrodynamic oil wedge anyhow.
http://www.stealth316.com/misc/clevite-77-rod-main...
http://www.motorheadheaven.com/it_bearinginstall.a...

RE: Acceptable conrod cap deformation

(OP)
Hi all,

We found the mistake. The deformation was measured from the fixed piston pin so included the stretching of the beam. Measured across the big end diameter, the deformation was 0.7 thou.

Thanks for the links Tmoose. From reading them I can see that I'll need to do some testing of these titanium rods to see how they wear and adjust the eccentricity of the bearings to suit.

cheers, derek

RE: Acceptable conrod cap deformation

Hi nchanga,

Is the big end geometry similar to a successful steel rod? If so, is there room to beef it up a bit?
I'd be concerned that Titanium's lower modulus would automatically make life harder for the rod bolt unless the "foot print" of the parting face is larger

RE: Acceptable conrod cap deformation

(OP)
The surface between the cap and rod are bigger than the steel rod and serrated (cap will be cut off by EDM.)

RE: Acceptable conrod cap deformation

When seating ball and roller bearings on the cylindrical seats, against abutting shoulders, it is often specified that the bearing nut initially be tightened to a value ~3X greater than the installation torque to really "seat" the ring/race and prevent positional changes due to emebedment.
Bearing races are normally finished very flat and quite smooth. Often bearing seat features are ground, so are likely pretty flat and smooth as well.

I'd wonder about the potential for embedment of the EDM'ed parting faces.
Is there clearance provided at the tips and roots of the serrations?
Since it is unlikely that the final installation preload is just 1/3 of the capabilities of the bolt, I'd be tempted to do a few experiments with multiple tightening cycles or subjecting the rod and cap to clamp loads far greater than the bolts/screws will be able to provide.

FWIW Ford flat head V8 main bearings had a single, curved serration.
http://www.precisionenginetech.com/wp-content/uplo...
Looks like maybe it is created as a single diameter, so it is up to the bolts to keep the cap from skewing.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources