×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Flexible Coupling

Flexible Coupling

Flexible Coupling

(OP)
Hi! I have a situation where the consultant requires the system to be provided with flexible joint whenever the pipes are passing through building expansion joint, however, our building does not belong to a category that requires seismic protection, however, the consultant insist that we need protection to compensate the thermal expansion of the pipes, so the question are, is it really requires that the fire fighting pipes shall be provided by victaulic (flexible) coupling and is it only at the location where pipes are passing through building expansion joint.

RE: Flexible Coupling

I don't have NFPA 13 in front of me now, But the chapter you are referring to is specific for seismic protection.
In the USA, the Building Code determines if the area is in a seismic zone and the Layout Technician of the sprinkler system uses NFPA 13 Chpater on Seismic Protection.

In your case, it sounds like the Engineer of Record (EOR) is insisting on specifying flexible couplings irrespective of the Building Code.

If your specs require you to "install per NFPA 13" then I suggest you send an RFI such as: "Spec requires layout and installation per NFPA 13. However, Spec requires flexible couplings when not required by NFPA 13. Please provide guidance and clarification on this"

RE: Flexible Coupling

The "stand answer" to pipe thermal expansion is an Expansion Loop, and your engineer wants to 'reinvent the wheel'. I would decline to install a flex-coupling in a firewater system without a signed drawing detailing the pipe & coupling installation. Because it won't work.

Pipe expansion is linear - it gets longer & shorter. A Flex-Coupling allows lateral, bending movements - thus they are necessary to survive a major earthquake. A Flex-Coupling does not allow for linear movement; they tend to leak. The standard non-expansion loop "pipe guy" answer for linear expansion is a bellows expansion joint. They work well but have two major limitations, one that applies to your instance.

1) Metallic Bellows pipe/pressure vessel expansion joints have a fatigue life of about 10K cycles - probably not a firewater system problem.
2) They are delicate - the bellows material is only about 0.045" thick. Dropping a 10" crescent wrench 15-ft onto one will ruin it and may even puncture it. Stepping on one will crush it. If I was forced to use a bellows in a firewater system, I would protect it by putting it inside a large pipe sleeve - freefloating, not in contact with the firewater line or the bellows. Just a 'tunnel' to protect the bellows.

RE: Flexible Coupling

(OP)
Thanks for the reply. First, our building is not under the seismic application with reference to the IBC code so that is why we did not used any sway brace in our piping and so I insisted to the Engineer that this flexible coupling attached to the piping (whenever pipe is passing through building expansion) is not required, same explanation you mentioned above, however, the next question of the engineer is, how about the thermal expansion of the piping, what will be the protection for this matter. Here in the middle east, the maximum probable temperature range inside the standard building (assuming the Air-conditioning system is off especially during night time) is around 20degC during cold season and up to 40degC during summer and applying the thermal expansion formula, the result is very minimal (2.34x10^-4 m/m), but the bottom line is, is the resulted value for the expansion can still maintain the integrity of the piping?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources