×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

NPSHR reduction with rising temperatures

NPSHR reduction with rising temperatures

NPSHR reduction with rising temperatures

(OP)

The relevant chart appears on:

http://www.mcnallyinstitute.com/Charts/NPSH_reduct...

Karassik et al., in their Pump Handbook (McGraw-Hill) show this chart (constructed from test data) saying that it could be used subject to some listed limitations.

I'd appreciate to read your opinions about the pertinent reason(s) for those NPSHR reductions (meant for pure deaerated liquids).

RE: NPSHR reduction with rising temperatures

Experience has confirmed that (esp.) hydrocarbons do not cavitate precisely according to what one would expect when deriving NPSHR based primarily on their vapor pressures.

Independent events are seldomly independent.

RE: NPSHR reduction with rising temperatures

(OP)

True and thanks. I'm after the underlying reason (s). I assume it has to do with the vapor specific volumes (L/kg) decreasing as temperatures rise.

For example with butane, when comparing its (saturation) properties at 30 and 50oC:

Vapor, L/kg; latent heat, kcal/kg; sound speed in liquid, m/s; pressure, atm; are respectively:

30oC => 140.1, 85.2, 874, 2.8
50oC => 81.7, 79.8, 767, 4.9

We see a reduction of more than 40% in specific volume, and only about 6% in latent heat. A small reduction of sound speed in the liquid of some 12% may also help in reducing the impact of shock waves when bubbles implode.

I'd much appreciate reading yours and other experts' opinions on the subject.

RE: NPSHR reduction with rising temperatures

(OP)

BTW, this strange effect doesn't mean that by heating the fluid stream we avoid cavitation, since the NPSHA drops (vapor pressures rise) by rising temperatures, probably even more than the allowable decrease in NPSHR.

RE: NPSHR reduction with rising temperatures

I have never seen this topic discussed to the point where reasons were given, but I would agree that the latent head and sonic velocity reductions are behind at least some of it. Both are always mentioned as contributors to cavitation damage and their reductions would lessen the amount of available energy. The relatively lesser sonic velocities for petroleum liquid products in relation to water would be consistent with the general practice of reducing NPSHR by 2 to 4 feet or so. What are the corresponding reductions for water?

Independent events are seldomly independent.

RE: NPSHR reduction with rising temperatures

(OP)
This is what Karassik et al, say in their Pump Handbook, about the subject:

"…If the suction system may be susceptible to transient changes in absolute pressure or temperature, a suitable margin of safety in NPSH should be provided. This is particularly important with hot water and may exceed the reduction that would otherwise apply with steady-state conditions."

An exercise with water between 30 and 90°C shows, respectively:

Vapor pressure, atm: 0.0419 & 0.0693;
Saturated vapor, m3/kg: 32.9 & 2.36;
Latent heat, kcal/kg: 600.7 & 545.5;
Sound speed, m/s: 1509 & 1556.

Note that sound speed rises with temperature.

For 90°C the allowable reduction would be about 0.7 ft. According to the graph, for 150oC, it would be about 4 ft.

RE: NPSHR reduction with rising temperatures

I would be very careful reducing NPSHR with hot water. It seems that there are always more than enough problems with cavitation in hot water pumps without applying any reduction.

Water is indeed a strange liquid. This shows a slight reduction of sonic velocity between 150 and 212F. http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/sound-speed-wate...

Independent events are seldomly independent.

RE: NPSHR reduction with rising temperatures

(OP)

You are absolutely right, indeed, water properties are weird.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources