Low volume token production
Low volume token production
(OP)
Hi everyone,
I'm currently looking for a suitable production method for a new product. The product itself is quite simple; it is a token with two holes and a short text message on the surface. It has both a front and a back print. Attached you will find some pictures.

The current material used is plastic, but we are open to use of different materials or manufacturing techniques. The difficulty is the fact that there will be a large number of different varieties, so the volume of each particular variety is low. The initial batch will consist of 30 different varieties. Of each variety only 100 products will be needed (so that makes 100x30 different key-chains).
Currently we’re very pleased with the appearance of this milled sample, because of the resolution, the recessed text, the edge quality and feel. However, this production method seems too expensive. I would like to hear ideas on what production process best fits this token and how to achieve a nice and affordable result for this particular product. In future, we expect to need bigger batches; So both short-term and long-term ideas would be great.
These are the current dimensions:
Diameter: 40 mm.
Thickness: 2,5 mm.
The current version is slightly elliptical, instead of round, but this aspect of the design is negotiable.
Greetings from Holland,
Max
I'm currently looking for a suitable production method for a new product. The product itself is quite simple; it is a token with two holes and a short text message on the surface. It has both a front and a back print. Attached you will find some pictures.

The current material used is plastic, but we are open to use of different materials or manufacturing techniques. The difficulty is the fact that there will be a large number of different varieties, so the volume of each particular variety is low. The initial batch will consist of 30 different varieties. Of each variety only 100 products will be needed (so that makes 100x30 different key-chains).
Currently we’re very pleased with the appearance of this milled sample, because of the resolution, the recessed text, the edge quality and feel. However, this production method seems too expensive. I would like to hear ideas on what production process best fits this token and how to achieve a nice and affordable result for this particular product. In future, we expect to need bigger batches; So both short-term and long-term ideas would be great.
These are the current dimensions:
Diameter: 40 mm.
Thickness: 2,5 mm.
The current version is slightly elliptical, instead of round, but this aspect of the design is negotiable.
Greetings from Holland,
Max





RE: Low volume token production
Google "custom laser etched tag" for plenty of sources
RE: Low volume token production
TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies
Need help writing a question or understanding a reply? forum1529: Translation Assistance for Engineers
RE: Low volume token production
It is better to have enough ideas for some of them to be wrong, than to be always right by having no ideas at all.
RE: Low volume token production
http://www.eng-tips.com/threadminder.cfm?pid=1529
Use translation assistance for Engineers forum
Note the rules include No Student posting
RE: Low volume token production
That being said, even with a product history of greater than 2 millenia, there are a finite number of practical solutions for coinage and similar products:
1- Casting (including diecasting, injection molding)
2- Printing and surface treatment ( silk screen, pad printing, hot stamping, enameling, etc)
3- Coining (blank/polish/coin, impact extrusion, embossing, etc)
4- Machining (milling, edm, engraving)
5- Electroplate or deposition (possibly the least practical of all methods)
Each of these processes have advantages and disadvantages in tooling costs, production costs, practical batch quantities, quality and finish of end product, etc.
If the OP has intricate milling capability, the production of tooling for either casting or coining should not be a major undertaking, and will yield the greatest advantage in production cost. It's a gamble, as is all business, to weigh the potential revenue against the initial investment.
My 2 cents, in coin of course
It is better to have enough ideas for some of them to be wrong, than to be always right by having no ideas at all.
RE: Low volume token production
Thanks for the quick replies. If I'm correct, the milled products were estimated at almost 1,5 EUR (1,96 USD), which seems unreasonably high. We're aiming at 0,15 EUR (0.2 USD)but any price reduction is welcome. Right now, we're considering laser etching, as the machining time can be greatly reduced, while the quality is still excellent. I'm wondering whether these production can be cheaper in another country, especially since it doesn't require much man hours.
In my opinion, any production method including a mold or die is out of the question right now, unless it's possible to fabricate a die/mold with which the text can be adjusted, or if there's some way to produce dirt cheap dies/molds for a batch of 100 product.
Printing would probably be cheapest, but I'm unsure if we can achieve a high enough production quality for our client that way.
RE: Low volume token production
I think that you are mistaken about the unit cost for milling vs. laser. Both tend to be have single unit at a time processing, which is what is costly. Only something with batch processing, i.e., many at a time, would have low unit cost.
TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies
Need help writing a question or understanding a reply? forum1529: Translation Assistance for Engineers
RE: Low volume token production
They sell the tag for ~12USD and give you a barcode that activates the machine, which you program yourself. The cut time, around a minute, was not real impressive. I assume the machine uses a fairly low power laser, but still, it is not substantially faster than CNC milling with a fast spindle. I suspect the speed is mostly limited by the electromechanical servos and their settling time.
Your basic problem is that your lot quantities are too small to justify investment in a fast technology, or the setup time and tooling cost required by a service company that has made the investment. ... regardless of what the actual technology is.
Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA