×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Which section modulus should I be using? Sb or St?
2

Which section modulus should I be using? Sb or St?

Which section modulus should I be using? Sb or St?

(OP)
Hi all. Am working on analyzing an old concrete slab/T-beam using ACE 318-63. Calculating the section modulus of the t-beam/slab, I of course get two section moduli - one based on the distance from the neutral axis to the top of the slab St, the other from the neutral axis to the bottom of the t-beam Sb. A big difference between the two.

Am checking the flexural capacity and wasn't sure which one St or Sb I should be using. I had figured since I was checking the allowable compressive stress which is at the top of the slab/t-beam, I'd be using St since that is where the compression block is. It's a simple span so there is no negative moment.

Thanks.

RE: Which section modulus should I be using? Sb or St?

Have you calculated this as though the T-beam was an homogenous material?

Michael.
"Science adjusts its views based on what's observed. Faith is the denial of observation so that belief can be preserved." ~ Tim Minchin

RE: Which section modulus should I be using? Sb or St?

(OP)
Yes.

RE: Which section modulus should I be using? Sb or St?

Why are you using an old code?

RE: Which section modulus should I be using? Sb or St?

I assume you meant to say ACI 318-63 (not ACE 318-63). Article 901 permitted either of two methods of design, working stress design (WSD) or ultimate strength design (USD).

If you want to use WSD, the transformed section is used for calculating properties of the T-beam. As you surmised, you must use St when calculating compressive stresses in the top fibers of the beam.

Using Sb based on the distance from the N.A. to the bottom of beam makes no sense at all since the transformed section is presumed to have no concrete below the N.A., i.e. the concrete in that area is presumed to be cracked.

Using USD seems to me to be more consistent with current practice. Is there some reason why you selected WSD?

BA

RE: Which section modulus should I be using? Sb or St?

(OP)
Due to the age of the loft, it would have been designed with ACI 318-63 originally at the time.

RE: Which section modulus should I be using? Sb or St?

(OP)
BA, we believe that at the time the slab was originally designed and constructed, it was done using WSD so we're trying to check the slab based on those design principles matching what was done back in those days.

RE: Which section modulus should I be using? Sb or St?

ACI318-63 was the first to introduce ultimate strength design, side by side with working stress design. Most of us who started with that code used USD, most of the time, because the universities mostly converted to teaching USD as soon as the code was introduced.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources