×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Should this dimension be boxed?
2

Should this dimension be boxed?

Should this dimension be boxed?

(OP)
If you have a part with two parallel surfaces which are controlled with GD&T (flatness and parallelism), should the dimension defining the distance between them be boxed? Or, is this optional? I am looking at two drawings put out by my company. In this scenario, one of them boxes this dimension, and one does not.

I could see this being optional. In other words, if it is not boxed, that means you go to the standard drawing tolerance block for the tolerance on the dimension, and the GD&T only controls the flatness of the first surface, and the orientation of the second surface relative to the first surface. But, if it is boxed, the GD&T would additionally provide the tolerance on the dimension defining the distance between the surfaces.

For the example part in the attached document, the tolerance on the dimension circled, if boxed, would be +/- .010. If not boxed, it would be +/- .040 (per our group's tolerance block).

This is probably a pretty simple question, but I'm really not sure!

RE: Should this dimension be boxed?

In your attachment, that dim of 8.00 must NOT be boxed (basic dim). This is because parallelism's job in life is to control the orientation (and form, indirectly) of the surface, never the distance. If you used the symbol for profile of a surface rather than parallelism, then you would have a choice of boxed or not boxed, depending on whether you wish to control orientation or location.

John-Paul Belanger
Certified Sr. GD&T Professional
Geometric Learning Systems

RE: Should this dimension be boxed?

No, this dimension should not be boxed.
In fact boxed (basic) dimension would be meaningless in this case. It defines perfect distance between left face of the block and datum plane A established from right face of the block, but since parallelism FCF does not have power to control any locational aspect of the relationship between two faces, left face could be at any distance from datum plane A.

RE: Should this dimension be boxed?

This is what I call perfect timing, J-P smile

RE: Should this dimension be boxed?

(OP)
Thanks for the clear and helpful responses.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources