×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

ACI supersede IBC - Gravel Footings

ACI supersede IBC - Gravel Footings

ACI supersede IBC - Gravel Footings

(OP)
I put both elements of this question in the title hoping to get feedback from those that might have familiarity with either topic.

A subcontractor on a project is proposing the use of gravel foundations for a 4 story wood framed building we are doing. These gravel foundations are intended to work in conjunction with precast concrete foundation walls which are used on residential buildings governed by the IRC (3 stories or less). Because these buildings are 4 stories, they fall under the IBC which doesn't make mention of gravel foundations and after a call to ICC committee are not approved for use in IBC governed buildings.

The subcontractor has proposed that since their foundation walls are an "engineered system" as defined by the ACI code which therefore supersedes the IBC and should therefore be permitted.

I have two concerns:
1. I have no experience with a system, any system, that claims precedence over the IBC unless very explicitly done (and I don't know of any that do)
2. I don't have confidence in gravel foundations under a 4 story building for several reasons such as: differential settlement possibilities between the wall footings and interior column footings, in plane shear loads, and wall chord forces.

Does anyone know of this reference about the building code?

Has anyone designed a 4 story or larger foundation on gravel footings?

PE, SE
Eastern United States

"If a builder builds a house for someone, and does not construct it properly, and the house which he built falls in and kills its owner, then that builder shall be put to death!"
~Code of Hammurabi

RE: ACI supersede IBC - Gravel Footings

It's my understanding that precedence works the other way around - the code doing the referencing takes precedence. So the IBC, which incorporates ACI 318 by reference, takes precedence over ACI in the event of conflict. It's just as how a state building code which incorporates the IBC by reference, takes precedence over the IBC itself. So in your situation, ACI wouldn't take precedence unless explicitly done so by a state code, as you mentioned.

However, it's unclear what you mean by "not approved". Do you mean that per the ICC committee, gravel foundations aren't allowed? Or that they just haven't specifically approved them? If it's the first, they are out, no question. But if it's the second, the subcontractor may be correct.

Brian C Potter, PE
Simple Supports - The history and practice of structural engineering.
ConstructionPic - Send annotated jobsite photos.

RE: ACI supersede IBC - Gravel Footings

(OP)
The code official we talked with at the ICC office said they were "not approved". I simply took that to mean "not allowed" but I see your point. I am not sure what the intention of his statement was.

PE, SE
Eastern United States

"If a builder builds a house for someone, and does not construct it properly, and the house which he built falls in and kills its owner, then that builder shall be put to death!"
~Code of Hammurabi

RE: ACI supersede IBC - Gravel Footings

Under the IBC, if a "system" is proposed and it deviates from the statement of the code, it should have an evaluation report that assesses its equivalence to the code mandate.

If there is a choice between two systems, the one with the more stringent requirements prevails. See Chapter 1 of the IBC under alternate materials and methods.

RE: ACI supersede IBC - Gravel Footings

The IBC certainly trumps ACI no question. However, if the Geotechnical report states a gravel foundation is acceptable and provides the necessary design parameters I don't see why it would not be allowed. The IRC is largely prescriptive whereas the IBC is much more open ended requiring more leeway for actual engineered designs (in most but not all instances) as opposed to a prescriptive one.

RE: ACI supersede IBC - Gravel Footings

ACI 318 is integrally woven into the IBC. They are not separable. There are certain provisions of ACI 318 that have been superceded by the IBC, but in most cases the IBC makes the provision more stringent, not less so.

A gravel foundation does not do the following:

It provides no uplift resistance so if your building is subject to wind loads, you can't meet the requirement for a continuous tensile tie from the foundation to the roof. Separate anchorage would be required.

If you are in a seismic zone of any import, you have no tangible mass in the foundation that can assist the structure in any way.

If you are in an area of soils that could migrate into the gravel (and almost any soil will...some worse than others), you have a settlement potential that is not clearly predictable.

If you are in an area of high rainfall or flood potential, you have a tremendous undermining potential that could place the structure at jeopardy for stability.

Personally, I would not allow this. Further, it is not an "approved" system and therefore does not meet the requirements of Section 104 of the IBC.

RE: ACI supersede IBC - Gravel Footings

Are these gravel filled geopiers?

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering

RE: ACI supersede IBC - Gravel Footings

(OP)
To answer some questions:

The geotech was not aware they wanted gravel foundations at the start of the project so did not make that part of his report. We have stipulated since the start of this discussion that they be brought back on board to approve before we consent.

No, these are not geo piers. Those would be a different situation. These are literally trenching a strip, as you would for a wall footing of concrete, and filling it in with gravel then compacting.

Ron, great list. Many are concerns we have had but it's great getting another engineers consensus on the same issues.

PE, SE
Eastern United States

"If a builder builds a house for someone, and does not construct it properly, and the house which he built falls in and kills its owner, then that builder shall be put to death!"
~Code of Hammurabi

RE: ACI supersede IBC - Gravel Footings

Other than to possibly save $$$ and time, why would the contractor want to use this type of foundation?

Like Ron, I would never do that here from what I can imagine.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering

RE: ACI supersede IBC - Gravel Footings

(OP)
Yes. To save money (prevailing wage for onsite masons or rod busters vs shop rates) and schedule (the precast guy says he can do a foundation start to finish in a week. The owner is holding the contractor to a cut throat GMP and a very abbreviated schedule which has left them with supposedly no other option than to use this product. However, we have never agreed to using this and have tried for months to get the "engineering data" the precast guy is using to justify their system but they and the contractor have ignored us completely. Now we are starting to get answers to our questions and finding out that it was all based on this product.

We are skeptical to say the least but are being squeezed from both sides to approve this.



PE, SE
Eastern United States

"If a builder builds a house for someone, and does not construct it properly, and the house which he built falls in and kills its owner, then that builder shall be put to death!"
~Code of Hammurabi

RE: ACI supersede IBC - Gravel Footings

If it was one BIG piece of gravel (i.e. a huge boulder) that the entire frame sat on - then bolting your structure to it would be OK..

But I'm being (or trying to be) silly.

Ron's list is perfect.

RE: ACI supersede IBC - Gravel Footings

Independent of the minimum requirements of codes, when your engineering judgment waves a flag, I recommend to honor it. The GC’s motivation is maximizing profit, yours to assure life safety and the building’s function.

Eric McDonald, PE
McDonald Structural Engineering, PLLC

RE: ACI supersede IBC - Gravel Footings

I would very strongly consider removing yourself as the engineer of record. It can be done...

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering

RE: ACI supersede IBC - Gravel Footings

Seems to me that the most knowledgeable party in this scenario is the Geotechnical Engineer. As the Engineer of Record, my stance would be that the Geotech must approve the foundation system.

RE: ACI supersede IBC - Gravel Footings

Wow. I didn't think a trench filled with gravel was what gravel foundation is. I wouldn't use it that for much of anything.

RE: ACI supersede IBC - Gravel Footings

miecz...

That may be OK for bearing, assuming it is not eventually undermined, but any uplift resistance needed to resist wind or seismic forces will just not be there as Ron stated unless concrete deadmen are also provided. I guess these would blow the contractor's budget... WOW!

This is very plainly just a very bad idea.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering

RE: ACI supersede IBC - Gravel Footings

To extend on what Mike said, this is very very plainly just a very very bad idea.

RE: ACI supersede IBC - Gravel Footings

My guess would be that this is a very very bad idea.

RE: ACI supersede IBC - Gravel Footings

Just curious, being someone who has never before heard of a "gravel footing", what goes between the gravel and the wood?

RE: ACI supersede IBC - Gravel Footings

air... and sky lifts...

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering

RE: ACI supersede IBC - Gravel Footings

Air? Especially after the termites have had their fill?

RE: ACI supersede IBC - Gravel Footings

Verily, verily is say unto thee.....this ain't a good idea.

RE: ACI supersede IBC - Gravel Footings

hokie66,

I thought the op said the building had precast concrete foundation walls. He never said how thick or how deep these walls were. I still think this is the geotech's call.

RE: ACI supersede IBC - Gravel Footings

Just wondering if the precast walls have a "strip footing" stub cast at the base of the wall? - i.e., projections beyond the wall by 6 or 8 inches each side that, then, in effect act as a footing - like a precast T-beam. The "gravel" trench might very well be put in to improve the soil that is there . . . just wondering . . .

RE: ACI supersede IBC - Gravel Footings

miecz,
I see, on rereading. In that case, they would be precast concrete footings. Gravel foundations perhaps, but not gravel footings, in my lingo at least. Acceptance of any system is not something I leave wholly to a geotechnical engineer.

RE: ACI supersede IBC - Gravel Footings

Hokie:
I think the idea of the gravel footings came from the Permanent Wood Foundation concept, years ago. At least, that’s the first time I saw it, and they do call them gravel or crushed rock footings. It was meant as a footing immediately under a 2x10 or 2x12 PT sill plate. You dug a 16 or 18" wide trench, 12 or 14" deep, filled it with compacted crushed rock and set the found. wall sill plate right on top of the crushed rock. It was also intended as part of the perimeter and under floor drainage system, and was tied into the exterior perimeter drain tile system. I always thought that they might as likely collect (attract and hold) water, and eventually fill with fines and be ineffective. They weren’t using any geotextile fabric wrapping in the early years. They could be built in winter without worrying about cold weather conc. practices. And, they performed best on sites with soils which drain well, sand or other granular soils. Some crazy contractors or builders expanded that concept to digging a trench filling it with a couple feet of rock and pouring an unformed stem wall on the rock for houses, etc. I’ve never seen it used for four stories, the most was two above grade floors and a basement wall which used the PT wood found. details. I’ve been involved in 6 or 8 cases over the years on this building technique, and those turned out poorly because the builder had no idea what he was really doing and used bad details, improper materials and poor waterproofing methods. Of course differential settlement could be a problem, for lack of the stiffness a poured conc. wall or a conc. blk. wall would offer.

RE: ACI supersede IBC - Gravel Footings

The one precast foundation wall system I am familiar with does not allow this as part of its ESR and strictly specifies the footing should be designed in accordance with the IBC. Gravel footing are only allowed in the IRC. Don't know the MFR you are dealing with but the ESR is more about the panels than the footings. The gravel footing tables cited in the ESR only go up to 3 story buildings as well (consistent with IRC design limitations).

http://www.superiorwalls.com/downloads/reports_fil...

______________
MAP

RE: ACI supersede IBC - Gravel Footings

I think Frank LLoyd Wright was the first to use them.
I would not go 4 stories. The foundation is the last place you want to try to save money as it is the hardest and most expensive to fix later.

RE: ACI supersede IBC - Gravel Footings

CSA S406, a Canadian Standard for Preserved Wood Foundations permits wood sleepers on a gravel bed. Sleeper must be wider than the foundation wall stud to project beyond the sheathing.

Dik

RE: ACI supersede IBC - Gravel Footings

(OP)
Just getting back to civilization after a long, much needed, break for the 4th.

Great feedback on everything. Focuseng had the right product that we are dealing with. It is a precast concrete wall beneath the wood sill plate that rests on a trench filled with gravel that they call a gravel footing. From what I have learned, Superior Walls licenses their product to individual suppliers who are responsible for their own engineering/installation data. It would seem then that some suppliers rely strictly on what is proposed in the codes and some, like who we are dealing with, apparently think their product is 'superior' to the codes (pun intended).

While I was out, it was decided that they would continue along the track of using this product. We are not going to specify it at all though nor are we going to approve it in any way. If they (contractor) choose to install this product, they must negotiate with the owner directly to find another EOR and we will absolve ourselves from it. We will provide a complete design based on what we believe in and it's completely on the owner to choose which route he proceeds with.

PE, SE
Eastern United States

"If a builder builds a house for someone, and does not construct it properly, and the house which he built falls in and kills its owner, then that builder shall be put to death!"
~Code of Hammurabi

RE: ACI supersede IBC - Gravel Footings

Excellent choice... Whew!

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering

RE: ACI supersede IBC - Gravel Footings

(OP)
It's still a dicey situation. It's extremely frustrating to have to put so much effort into disassociating ourselves from the responsibility for a project. That's not what we train to do nor is it in our make up as engineers to make decisions that way. Playing the CYA game is no fun.

PE, SE
Eastern United States

"If a builder builds a house for someone, and does not construct it properly, and the house which he built falls in and kills its owner, then that builder shall be put to death!"
~Code of Hammurabi

RE: ACI supersede IBC - Gravel Footings

Everytime I hear "value engineering", I want to disassociate myself from the project.
It always turns into a mess and a bunch more liability for the EOR. The savings are not likely what they think when all is said and done.

RE: ACI supersede IBC - Gravel Footings

The IBC is customized and adopted by the state legislature and basically has the strength of law. Specific sections of the ACI standards are empowered by reference in the IBC. The IBC claims precedence over any differences. Having said this, the IBC is not really a rigorous design code and it defers heavily to the ACI (and other) technical standards...much in the same way that the code now defers almost entirely to ASCE-7 for loads.

I recall that there is language at the front of the IBC which recognizes the engineer's latitude and prerogative for alternate methodologies, materials, standards, etc. I don't recall the red tape involved in exercising this however.

RE: ACI supersede IBC - Gravel Footings

I've seen these footings work surprising well, but I'd never do it on anything other than 2 story or less, and it would have to be for someone that was really desperate to save money. You would need fabric around the gravel footings to reduce migration of fines, but significant prolonged loading will cause this to settle. Terrible idea for four stories. Your bottom plate will be destroyed by crushing perpendicular to the grain. Triple 2x8 treated bottom plate?

_________________________
Tony Krempin, PE
TopKnot Engineering

RE: ACI supersede IBC - Gravel Footings

(OP)
Tony, this is my experience as well. The salesman for the product has insisted that their product "gets used all over the place" yet most of what we have looked at has all been 2 and sometimes 3 stories. Not a single four story application. Great comment on the fabric around the footings and I will keep it in mind. Not sure I follow you though about the bottom plate...that's a function of 4 stories more so than the precast walls, right?

Excel...I know what you mean. Value engineering certainly doesn't apply to how the EOR views it.

PE, SE
Eastern United States

"If a builder builds a house for someone, and does not construct it properly, and the house which he built falls in and kills its owner, then that builder shall be put to death!"
~Code of Hammurabi

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources