×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

diametrical perpendicular tolerance zone...?

diametrical perpendicular tolerance zone...?

diametrical perpendicular tolerance zone...?

(OP)
I get quite a few drawings with a diameter symbol on the tolerance in the FCF for a perpendicular callout. I always thought perpendicular was 2 dimensional only….

More specifically, the callouts I am referring to are all on tube parts, where a tube is welded together at 90° and they want to control perpendicularity. Datum A is the axis of one of the legs. Since the parts are round, the habit is to put a diameter on the perpendicular tolerance value. IMO, it makes no difference, it’s still 2 dimensional and does not need a diameter spec.

Am I wrong?

lightweight, cheap, strong... pick 2

RE: diametrical perpendicular tolerance zone...?

It is a valid callout. In the 1994 standard look at figure 6-39 on page 184. I don't have the 2009 standard handy right now but the meaning of this callout hasn't changed. It absolutely makes a difference if you associate the callout with the FOS. Think of the pin in figure 6-39. It could be barrelled or waisted but the derived "axis" could still be very perpendicular. If you associate the perp callout to the surface elements of the pin, then you could actually fail the spec because you aren't concerned with the axis of the part as much as the surface elements. Granted if the axis spec fails then the surface spec fails, but that's not necessarily true the other way around.

John Acosta, GDTP S-0731
Engineering Technician
Inventor 2013
Mastercam X6
Smartcam 11.1
SSG, U.S. Army
Taji, Iraq OIF II

RE: diametrical perpendicular tolerance zone...?

Quote (Koda94)

I always thought perpendicular was 2 dimensional only…

As a matter of fact it is quite the opposite. By default, that is if no diameter symbol precedes a tolerance value in a perpendicularity FCF, the tolerance zone is a space between two parallel PLANES perfectly oriented to datum(s) - para. 6.4.2(b) in Y14.5-2009. This means that the zone has a "depth", so it is 3-dimensional. As it is easy to imagine, such approach does not really control any orientation of the axis in the direction of the "depth".

Applying a diameter symbol in a perpendicularity FCF theoretically solves this issue. Now the axis must fall within a cylinder of a certain size perfectly oriented to datum(s) - para. 6.4.2(c) in Y14.5-2009, so any tilt of the axis is limited by cylindrical boundary of the tolerance zone. In the light of this definition, the callouts you see are correct.

The other side of a story is that in cases when only a single datum axis is specified in the perpedicularity FCF, the cylindrical tolerance zone can freely rotate around that datum axis...

RE: diametrical perpendicular tolerance zone...?

Koda,
If you have a chance, get your hands on copy of ASME Y14-5.1M-1994 (2013 may be in the making).
Literally half of the book (Appendix A) is covering ALL THE POSSIBLE COMBINATIONS of tolerance zones created by tolerances of orientation.
Truly an eye-opener, if you want to apply your knowledge of geometry to GD&T.

RE: diametrical perpendicular tolerance zone...?

Quote (CheckerHater)

Koda,
If you have a chance, get your hands on copy of ASME Y14-5.1M-1994 (2013 may be in the making).
Literally half of the book (Appendix A) is covering ALL THE POSSIBLE COMBINATIONS of tolerance zones created by tolerances of orientation."

Quote:


CheckerHater,

Did you want to say "Mathematical Definition of Dimensioning and Tolerancing Principles" right?
Not the Y14.5M-1994 Dimensioning and Tolerancing

RE: diametrical perpendicular tolerance zone...?

Yep. Isn't it 14.5.1?
I guess we both need coffee

RE: diametrical perpendicular tolerance zone...?

(OP)
ahhhh, I am wrong then.

thanks all for the replies. I agree I need to get a copy of the standards, I've put in a request which was approved, but no followup and still no standards.... things move slow here, frustrating. What bugs me is I'm the only one who is insisting on a copy of the standards, so what happens is I see a lot of drawings with errors that set the precedence for more drawings so I have to question things now and then.

CheckerHater, I think this is the book you are referring to: http://www.amazon.com/Mathematical-Definition-Dimensioning-Tolerancing-Principles/dp/0791822524 At $15.00 I am going to order a copy when I get home tonight....

lightweight, cheap, strong... pick 2

RE: diametrical perpendicular tolerance zone...?

Koda,
Just be careful, make sure this is the “real” standard.
It’s supposed to look like this:

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources