×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Concrete Unit Weight Control

Concrete Unit Weight Control

Concrete Unit Weight Control

(OP)
In general, for the same local aggregates & sand, is the unit weight of the concrete increased by going from 1" stone to a pea gravel size stone in the mix?

We have a project that requires 4,500 psi @ 148 pcf concrete and the "standard mix" designs are producing 145 pcf concrete at the site. It seems that a shift to pea gravel produce a more dense concrete with little or no affect to the strength. Comments?

RE: Concrete Unit Weight Control

Reducing the aggregate size causes the need to increase the volume of cement paste because the total surface area of aggregate than needs to be coated by cement paste increases. This means that you need more cement and water. Cement has a specific gravity of about 1.5 times the aggregate specific gravity, so the combination will increase the unit weight.

Now, requiring a specific unit weight for concrete is absurd. At best, you can only hit a range of unit weights given the variation in aggregates and mixes. I would suggest that a range of 145 to 155 pcf would be appropriate and would give the mix supplier the necessary latitude to provide you with a mix responsive to the needs of the project.

Also keep in mind that when you reduce the coarse aggregate size and adjust the cement content accordingly, you will also increase the amount of plastic and drying shrinkage you will get, so there is even more criticality to the timing of finishing and sawcut joints.

RE: Concrete Unit Weight Control

(OP)
Thanks for your comments. This project has a minimum unit weight requirement to achieve the necessary shielding for a medical device. The shielding is a function of the concrete thickness and unit weight. The wall thickness is fixed at 4'-6" which drives the need for the minimum unit weight of 147 pcf of the cured concrete. I've been told to achieve this, the as placed unit weight must be 151 pcf or above since upon reaching full cure, the concrete will loose 2-3 pcf.

RE: Concrete Unit Weight Control

jheidt -

In an earlier life, I was involved in providing CMUs (concrete block) for shielding in nuclear power plants and later for X-ray facilities.

Because of the specifications for pre-construction certification of the products and not mix designs they required up to 6 wythes of very dense (somewhat higher than your requirements) 6" solid block for walls that were straight and curved and installed in the middle stages of construction. Since block were required by the turn-key contractor and engineers you could not play with adding cement to a mix and we had no choice but to switch from a very good, dense local aggregates, we used a non-local iron ore bearing aggregates (hematite, I recall) and had it crushed to an acceptable gradation for manufacture and had to up the mix cement and sand content (minor cost) because of the manufacturing process. The cost increase was due to the shipping of the aggregate, but it had impact to the owner or CM since they knew how to meet the government requirements.

In short, the aggregate was costly, but the results made for a flawless jobs because we had tested and certified approved cured units to be used in construction instead of relying on comparing mix designs with field samples. If it is critical, look to other types of aggregate that a good local ready-mix supplier should be able to develop.

Dick

Engineer and international traveler interested in construction techniques, problems and proper design.

RE: Concrete Unit Weight Control

Ron is correct. The specification is absurd. But if you want the concrete to be heavier, find some aggregate with a higher specific gravity rather than relying on adjusting the size.

RE: Concrete Unit Weight Control

I can agree that the unit weight specification might be absurd in many cases but, say, in the case of a concrete gravity structure (dam, for instance), there is a need for the unit weight to be considered. UK used to have a 2400 kg/m3 mix - and this seems, at least here, to be continued. Our aggregates won't reach it - about 50 kg short to just about 2400. If the design is that critical then something is wrong with the design. Never had that problem on another job as our aggregates specific gravity was something like 3.

just wondering if the use of silica fume might help in the shielding aspects . . . gives a much lower "permeability" which, in my view, means a denser mix . . .? Any thoughts on this?

RE: Concrete Unit Weight Control

BigH...no problem with considering and specifying a unit weight range, it was just that in this case they seemed to specifying an exact unit weight that would impracticable to meet and maintain with consistency.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources